Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Ellison Statement on Trump Administration’s Attack on Net Neutrality
Congressman Keith Ellison ^ | May 19, 2017 | Congressman Keith Ellison

Posted on 05/19/2017 2:51:49 PM PDT by mdittmar

Press Release

Today, the FCC voted to begin rolling back Title II protections for net neutrality – a boon for multi-billion-dollar internet service corporations, and a huge step back for working Americans. I remain a strong supporter of a free and open internet, and deeply disturbed that FCC Chairman Ajit Pai is working on behalf of telecom companies and at the expense of everyone else.

 

Title II is the legal foundation that allows net neutrality to exist. Under Title II, the Internet has remained open for competition, innovation and creativity. Contrary to what Chairman Pai and the telecommunications industry have claimed, broadband investment has continued apace and Internet service provider revenues have continued to grow since the Commission issued its landmark decision in 2015. Allowing Internet service providers to create fast lanes would give an unfair advantage to people with money, and burden the rest of us with a slower Internet. It would also create barriers for the web entrepreneurs and innovators who have great ideas, but wouldn’t be able to compete on a pay-to-play Internet.

 

Most importantly, strong Net Neutrality rules have worked to keep the Internet free from discrimination against users, regardless of their race or economic status. You simply cannot claim to support the open Internet and Net Neutrality rules while abandoning and attacking the legal framework that makes those rules possible.

 

In April, I led a letter signed by 32 of my colleagues in the CPC urging Chairman Pai not to roll back the progress made under the Obama administration to protect net neutrality. My colleagues and I will continue to fight for net neutrality as the rulemaking process unfolds over the next several months.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS:
Congressman Keith Ellison? on Net Neutrality?
1 posted on 05/19/2017 2:51:49 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Dear congressman ellison: Shut up. You lost.


2 posted on 05/19/2017 2:56:04 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

It is not an ‘attack’ and it is also no ‘net “neutrality”.

The innocuous sounding name means government control.

The free market has done a pretty good job with the internet. Leave it be.


3 posted on 05/19/2017 2:58:14 PM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

anti-American Islamo pr*ck, is almost always against any effective defense of this country or even border control to stop more IslamoNazi terrorist cell members from sneaking in (or being admitted, welcomed under Obama regime rules still in force)


4 posted on 05/19/2017 2:58:40 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
U.S. Representative Keith Ellison - MN 5th District

5 posted on 05/19/2017 2:58:58 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Winning!


6 posted on 05/19/2017 3:08:16 PM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

This muzzy should shut the f*ck up. *slam is incompatible with the Constitution. Get the f*ck out.


7 posted on 05/19/2017 3:13:30 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Acting consistently in a way that is contrary to nature results in insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Title II gives the dems the ability to regulate CONTENT on the internet.

This whole thing has been a red herring attack to sucker the masses into demanding government control on how data flows on the internet. Once that is entrenched it’s a simple matter of controlling WHAT data flows on the internet and that’s what dems are after and why they’re pushing so hard for the FCC to control the data and NOT the FTC to regulate the costs of it! (Which is what Ajit is arguing should be handled for REAL net neutrality)

The dems are not here to help you - the dems are here to oppress you.


8 posted on 05/19/2017 3:21:17 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

FReepers, it's time to get serious about retiring this FReep-a-thon.


Free Republic, the Home of the Eternal FReeper, Conservatism's Finest  (timely thoughts on the FReeper dynamic and Free Republic)

Ramirez's latest political cartoon LARGE VERSION
05/17/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized version of Ramirez's latest, and an archive of his political cartoons.


Please join the monthlies, an automated way to help support Free Republic.

If you are not opting to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  
LINK



FReepers, 48.90% of the Second Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!

...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

9 posted on 05/19/2017 3:27:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Word of the Day WhatIs.com

Net Neutrality (open internet)

Net Neutrality is the principle that data packets on the Internet should be moved impartially, without regard to content, destination or source. The Net Neutrality principle holds that wired and wireless internet service is a utility like gas, water, electricity and landline phone service; it should be available to everyone and subject to government regulation. The term came from "Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination," a paper written by Columbia Law School professor Tim Wu in 2003.

Net Neutrality debate

In the United States, internet service providers (ISPs) and Net Neutrality proponents disagree about whether broadband internet is an opt-in service or a necessary utility. If the internet is a utility, it must be licensed by a government agency and customer data cannot be sold.

must?

How is that for structuring the Net Neutrality debate?

10 posted on 05/19/2017 3:29:50 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

That sums it up.


11 posted on 05/19/2017 3:39:38 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
In honor of the freedom this Son of Moe is trying to steal:


12 posted on 05/19/2017 3:40:31 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Ellison, a friend of CAIR. Wake-up America before it’s too late.


13 posted on 05/19/2017 3:59:10 PM PDT by Machavelli (True God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

According to Obama and progs NAMBLA is owed the same bandwidth as Netflix.


14 posted on 05/19/2017 11:59:40 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson