New York Times: Thank 'Snowflakes' for Protecting Free Speech

Newsbusters.org ^ | April 24, 2017 | Kristine Marsh

[DoughtyOne]

You will not win by misinterpreting secular discussions into something that twists reality so badly that it looks like a servant of God has gone full on mental.

This reflects poorly on God.

Hopefully folks will not see this as something God would countenance, and would realize it’s just a man who has lost his way.

[DoughtyOne]

George Washington would not agree with what is going on at our universities.

He certainly wouldn’t think it was ordained by God.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Oh you are God’s PR police? NO you are a self appointed nanny. Advocating nanny methods.

[DoughtyOne]

God never supports anarchy. NEVER

You are attributing things to God you have no place doing.

[HiTech RedNeck]

That’s neither here nor there. It is not fair to drag him into a situation he never addressed.

[DoughtyOne]

You brought him into this conversation.

I merely responded to your idiotic quip.

[HiTech RedNeck]

The choice is HOW to get “archy.” You have a one track fascistic mind about it.

[DoughtyOne]

That didn’t even make sense.

Are you drinking this evening?

[HiTech RedNeck]

Go ahead be full of yourself then. I will not dignify it with more answers.

[DoughtyOne]

Why is it that when folks get upset with me defending my position to their detriment, they always try to insult me into shutting up?

Are you full of yourself for defending your position? Well of course not. You’re here on behalf of the god who defends anarchy and organized crime on our university campuses. How could you be wrong?

[DocRock]

"Yelling fire in a crowded theater is dangerous."

Except when there is a real fire and it saves lives. In case you missed my comparison, I was implying that it is protected free speech to burn a flag, I'm just not allowed to complain about it.

[MarkL]

Who Knew? Baer must be pro-life, and opposes the speech of pro-abortion people! Using his own argument:

Some topics, such as claims that some human beings are by definition inferior to others, or illegal or unworthy of legal standing, are not open to debate because such people cannot debate them on the same terms...When those views invalidate the humanity of some people, they restrict speech as a public good...In such cases there is no inherent value to be gained from debating them in public.

Since pro-abortion people deny the humanity of unborn children, and claim the unborn have no legal standing, using his one statements, the pro-abortion supporters must be silenced.

Mark

[Kaslin]

Well of course.