Clinton Camp Instituted ‘Loyalty Scores’ Following 2008 Loss

dailycaller.com ^ | 4/21/17 | Amber Randall

[ColdOne]

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton created “loyalty scores” to measure how loyal Democrats were to her after her failed 2008 campaign, according to a new book on her latest campaign failure.

Clinton had two staffers “toil” to rate every Democrat members of Congress on a scale of one to seven — one being the most loyal — after she lost the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama in 2008. Her husband Bill Clinton then deliberately campaigned against the disloyal “sevens” in subsequent primary elections, and succeeded in getting some of them removed. Some of those who remained apparently took note, and were quick to endorse Hillary in 2016.

[castlegreyskull]

I wonder what Seth Rich’s was?

[EagleUSA]

Let the sharks eat each other alive. What a disgusting group of reprobates.

[Gaffer]

She can count herself lucky if that porker (in waiting to burst out all over in an explosion of fat) daughter of hers gets into Congress.

It will cost millions and millions and she doesn’t have the brains, frankly. All for naught. Little Chelsea was never prepared for the Democrat Hunger Games.

[Buttons12]

I wonder what Bubba’s score was!

[Liz]

More proof that Obama and Susan "The Sifter" Rice spied on Dumborats.
Oba was paranoid Demsy were giving him the shiv behind his half-caste ***.

================================================

The ease and nonchalance with which lawless Obama and Susan "The Sifter" used the mega-intel power of the US govt to surveil friends and foe alike make it very probable they spied on Democrats.

<><> CASE IN POINT<><> Democrats Schiff and Feinstein were reportedly shocked at the spying revelations Trump personally unveiled to them.....probably b/c they were shown proof Obama spied on Democrats.

Trump knew Democrats would be sap-happy to see Republicans outed....no biggie to them. So it's more than likely S and F were shocked....b/c they saw evidence of Democrats spied upon.

Spying on Repubs is bad enough....but Obama/Rice spying on their own party? The revelations could be earth-shaking....lots of intel on Democrats' offshore financial activities, in Tahiti, French Polynesia, the Caribbean, Central America, and the like.

=================================================

<><> Obama probably surveilled Penguin Book editors to get the 60 million deal.

<><>Probably surveilled Harvey weinstein to get the job for Malia.

<><> Lois Lerner needed intel to target conservatives applying for tax-exempt status.

==============================================

"Susan the Sifter" gets her orders for the day.

"Susan, as you sift through the intel, get me something
damaging on Penguin books so I can shake them down for
a lucrative book deal."

"And get Harvey Einstein's tax returns. Malia needs a job."

"Oh, and Lois needs intel to target conservatives' tax-exempt status.
And don't forget the FBI files on Sharyl Atkisson, Dennic Kucinick, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer

[Cowboy Bob]

...her latest campaign failure.

LOL!

[Diana in Wisconsin]

“I wonder what Seth Rich’s was?”

That poor sap scored a two...’two to the back of the head.’

Remind me again WHY this evil, awful, waste of oxygen ‘woman’ is still walking free, let alone running for President?!?

Aarrgghh!

[Gaffer]

Hitler had loyalty scores in his bunker, too. They were the ones that took the doses after shooting their children. Nice bunch that. Same here. Just a different generation, that’s all.

[Vlad The Inhaler]

Ve Must Keep All The Little People In Line !

[Cowboy Bob]

Her husband Bill Clinton then deliberately campaigned against the disloyal “sevens” in subsequent primary elections, and succeeded in getting some of them removed. Some of those who remained apparently took note, and were quick to endorse Hillary in 2016.

Can thi sbe proven? Or is it just BS to build up the image of Bill?

[thinden]

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton created “loyalty scores” a code of omerta to measure how loyal Democrats were to her

[PCPOET7]

this is one of the reasons that the democrat party has become a marginalized party having to listen to there extremist base. this should be an object lesson for republicans about not allowing differing views with in the party and allowing one person or group within the party to determine who the good conservatives are so they can get rid of there opposition with in the party.....all I have to say is thanks Hillary for helping your Obama destroy itself from within.

[Bon mots]

[proud American in Canada]

And they compare Trump to Hitler?

[ransomnote]

Great post. I wondered about the tactics in play. Dems were and are still trying to deny the surveillance claims in a way that the president would “have” to show the public confidential information about himself. They were taunting and taunting “There’s no proof! He’s crazy...”

Then President Trump has that meeting with them. The two Dem critters absolutely grey in the face when they left the meeting and yet they staggered over to microphones and cameras to resume their claims that they’d seen the evidence and there was no proof he was surveilled. Well - he didn’t show them intel on himself (”proof”), he showed them intel about THEM.
Brilliant strategy and it’s why they keep saying “THey’ve never SEEN any proof...”

[Liz]

You’ll be hearing a lot of “Everybody does it.”

Comes directly from the Rice defense tesm.

[Liz]

N-i-c-e catch.

Dems were taunting and taunting Trump: “There’s no proof! He’s crazy...”

Then Trump calls in two Dems....they turned absolutely grey in the face and yet they staggered over to the cameras to resume their claims that they’d seen the evidence and there was no proof Trump was surveilled.

Well - he didn’t show them intel on himself (”proof”), he showed them intel about THEM.

Brilliant Trump strategy and it’s why they keep saying “They’ve never SEEN any proof...”

[Liz]

POSSIBLE SCENARIO: Trump announces Democrats will be pleased to know that Trump is inspired by their esteemed leader......Obama.

Trump announces: "Democrats are absolutely right; I am just plain wrong for suggesting the Obama admin spied on me. After all, as Democrats said, Susan Rice was just doing her job."

Democrats are OK w/ Obama/Susan's surveilling/unmasking b/c it's "all legal."

Pres Trump announces he needs to do his job, that since this is “all legal,” his administration will step up and do the legal thing to protect Americans' safety and security.

The Trump admin will follow in Obama's footsteps....surveilling and unmasking any and all Democrats, on a continuing non-stop basis, particularly Democrats who have talked with foreign ambassadors, foreign financial groups, tropical offshore entities, and the like.

Plus, the Trump administration will ask for the “unmasking” of all those Democrats who are involved in such talks... because it is "legal."

AND Trump will use "Obama’s very own inspired legal rules" to distribute the information on Democrats to every US intelligence agency.

[ransomnote]

A girl can dream.... :)
To add to your possible strategy scenario - the rhino GOP. There’s apparently dirt on everybody in congress - it’s how Obama neutered them.