================================================
The ease and nonchalance with which lawless Obama and Susan "The Sifter" used the mega-intel power of the US govt to surveil friends and foe alike make it very probable they spied on Democrats.
<><> CASE IN POINT<><> Democrats Schiff and Feinstein were reportedly shocked at the spying revelations Trump personally unveiled to them.....probably b/c they were shown proof Obama spied on Democrats.
Trump knew Democrats would be sap-happy to see Republicans outed....no biggie to them. So it's more than likely S and F were shocked....b/c they saw evidence of Democrats spied upon.
Spying on Repubs is bad enough....but Obama/Rice spying on their own party? The revelations could be earth-shaking....lots of intel on Democrats' offshore financial activities, in Tahiti, French Polynesia, the Caribbean, Central America, and the like.
=================================================
<><> Obama probably surveilled Penguin Book editors to get the 60 million deal.
<><>Probably surveilled Harvey weinstein to get the job for Malia.
<><> Lois Lerner needed intel to target conservatives applying for tax-exempt status.
==============================================
"Susan the Sifter" gets her orders for the day.
"Susan, as you sift through the intel, get me something
damaging on Penguin books so I can shake them down for
a lucrative book deal."
"And get Harvey Einstein's tax returns. Malia needs a job."
"Oh, and Lois needs intel to target conservatives' tax-exempt status.
And don't forget the FBI files on Sharyl Atkisson, Dennic Kucinick, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer
Great post. I wondered about the tactics in play. Dems were and are still trying to deny the surveillance claims in a way that the president would “have” to show the public confidential information about himself. They were taunting and taunting “There’s no proof! He’s crazy...”
Then President Trump has that meeting with them. The two Dem critters absolutely grey in the face when they left the meeting and yet they staggered over to microphones and cameras to resume their claims that they’d seen the evidence and there was no proof he was surveilled. Well - he didn’t show them intel on himself (”proof”), he showed them intel about THEM.
Brilliant strategy and it’s why they keep saying “THey’ve never SEEN any proof...”