Posted on 04/13/2017 11:54:43 AM PDT by C19fan
Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa's biggest cities.
If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.co.za ...
I was curious enough about that too, and intended to point out that glaring hole in her logic. Alas, scrolling down I realized there was no comments section.
Which is probably good for her delicate sensibility. Wouldn’t want a pesky thing like reality get in the way of a good fantasy.
It appears to be a man. A crazy man.
LOL! You got that right.
I wouldn’t say it where my wife could hear it, but I entirely agree with the sentiment.
And RSA is dying, inch by inch, since that stinking COMMIE, “saint” Nelson became president. She should just move to Zimbabwe and see how “great” her stupid ideas work, when fully put into practice.
No women. No single men. No childless men. No divorced men."
I like that idea a lot.
Could it be time to deny complete idiots the vote?
Thank you for your deep insightful thoughts. You are a reflection of the high standards of the American education system. Obviously you look to the following non-white leadership as the high standards us white males should strive for.
Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo – President Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea is one of Africa's largest producers of oil and has one of the highest per capita incomes in the world
The country also has one of the world’s highest under-5 mortality rates: about 20% of its children die before the age of five. Many of the remaining 80% of the children don’t have access to quality educational and healthcare facilities.
José Eduardo dos Santos, President of Angola
According to the United States Agency For International Development (USAID), the country is the second-largest oil producer in sub-Saharan Africa.
But for all its resource wealth, the vast majority of Angolans still live in the most horrid socio-economic conditions. 68% of the country’s total population lives below the poverty line of $1.7 a day, while 28% live on less than 30 cents. Education is free, but it’s practically worthless.
Robert Mugabe, President of Zimbabwe
The country’s high literacy rate does not necessarily translate into employment opportunities for its people. Zimbabwe’s unemployment rate is the highest in sub-Saharan Africa: it's over 60%.
Sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch presides over a country which has one of the world's highest HIV prevalence rates: ver 35 percent of adults. Its average life expectancy is the lowest in the world at 33 years; nearly 70 percent of the country’s citizens live on less than $1 a day and 40 percent are unemployed.
Omar Al-Bashir, President of Sudan
after seizing power, Al-Bashir dispersed all political parties in the country, disbanded the country’s parliament and shut down all privately-owned media outlets. His reign has been characterized by a civil war in which over one million have been killed, while several millions have been displaced.
Nicolás Maduro Moros President ofVenezuela
As protests against Maduro intensified in the slums of the South American country on Wednesday, the death count rises while food supplies decrease
ETC
ETC
Mfonobong Nsehe , Wall Street Journal WSJ
It's that way now. My son and others he knows didn't get into a state law school, won't mention which one, because half of the entering students had to be AA or other minority applicants. . so he heard via the grapevine. The other half of course, half of that group were women, so white males have a 25% chance of getting into any grad school now? Don't have data on that, just conjecturing. I know it's way down. If I put BLM down 100 times on the application, will I get in? Not a chance.
When I went to med school, we had an all white class except for three orientals. They were great guys and really smart. Only two of our classmates were women. Now that was a long time ago, graduated in 70.
I had some good friends who were qualified who didn't get in, would have made good doctors. Now the admission criteria are tighter and tighter.
Also, as an aside, a daughter of a friend of mine, pre-med, went to look at med schools and all she ran into were butch haircut feminazi types looking at the schools and the Freshman-Sophomores students walking the hallways. She said she was shocked. This gal is close to looking like Ivanka. Hope she gets in.
BUMP
The map above shows how the 2016 US Presidential election might go if only one demographic group got the vote.
The map was created by Ste Kinney-Fields and is based on data from from fivethirtyeight and 270towin.
You can read the full article here.
“the correlation of memes with genes....”
Kudos to you, for using the word “memes” correctly.
(Hint to everyone else, a funny graphic posted on the Internet is not a “meme”.)
Because both women and African Americans as groups consistently vote against liberty, you would have a considerably stronger argument for taking away their votes.
Progressive = repressive
there were NOTHING , BUT, WHITE MEN at the forming and signing of this gov.-—VIRTUALLY ALL defending of this country for 200 yrs, has been WHITE MEN——virtually ALL progressmade in this country has been through the efforts of WHITE MEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!IF you are NOT a WHITE MALE , you are holding on to coattails and sucking at the trough!!!!!!!!!!IF you are unhappy with that truth-—PLEASE LEAVE!!!!!!!!-—I would contribute to a git rid of them” fund!!!!!!
After reading the article, I am convinced that she is serious. I had to ascertain that, first.
What she is advocating, is essentially requiring that white men become 2nd class citizens. To achieve that, somebody’s gotta apply the “force”. There would have to be a movement not unlike Nazi Germany, where some group has to have the weapons to enforce the “rules”.
So who is going to do the enforcement? Will white females rise up against the patriarchy and take up arms against the men? Will white females align themselves with some group of “preferred males”, to rise up against white men? So many things to contemplate here. Maybe this is the secret alliance? White women and Muslim men, rise up against the common enemy, white men?
She is of course, just talking and thinking about the feminist dream. Reality is somewhat different.
Think it over.
Are you really?
I wonder how many truly understand how many women are going to have to be disenfranchised to restore social and political stability.
It should be noted that the Prophet Isaiah tells us having "women and children rule over you" is considered a curse.
I don’t mind if they vote. As long as illegal voting isn’t done I believe our side wins
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.