Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/19/2017 12:10:49 PM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: COBOL2Java

Chuang is a #FakeJudge who is also a #FakeAmerican.


45 posted on 03/19/2017 12:45:01 PM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

I’m not aware of any election Congressional mandate that put this jackass judge in charge of the Presidential duties. He deserves to be prosecuted for his illegal power grab. I hope AG Sessions pursues it.


48 posted on 03/19/2017 12:47:39 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

The Democrats are now so far left and have no idea they’ve become completely detached from reality! The side of militant atheists, communists, anarchists, socialists, etc., is showing how uncivilized they are - it’s unhinged....and Trump is a white Christian. This is nothing more than mob think, pure, dripping with hate, intolerant bigotry.

The fact that this moron thinks he has the power to specify the NUMBER that is allowed is astonishing. Talk about overreach, has nothing to do with interpreting the law.

As it is now so plainly transparent, Trump should just ignore him. He has zero executive power to do anything. The President, regardless of who it is, can’t have their power usurped by these activist judges. It is a danger to this nation and our national security. Congress needs to act!


51 posted on 03/19/2017 12:52:43 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Since when these mofos are the executive and decides who is a refugee?

Sue these judges under RICO


53 posted on 03/19/2017 12:58:07 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

This is what happens when you let a Bush judged block an immigration policy. Now they are running the whole executive in total anarchy.


55 posted on 03/19/2017 1:00:58 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

FEMA trailers left over from Katrina / activist judge’s neighborhood / extra refugees relocated

more trailers put on order for the next judge who thinks he’s a law unto himself


56 posted on 03/19/2017 1:03:20 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

1. The State Department can go as slow as it wants in vetting refugees and issuing visas.
2. The Constitution allows Congress to set the jurisdiction of the lower courts. President Trump should propose a law depriving all district and appellate courts any jurisdiction to rule on matters of immigration law (except for criminal cases like illegal retlentry, etc). Congress could decide to provide jurisdiction to one particular district court or to none at all, in which case challenges to his actions would have to be brought in the Supreme Court. Or Congress could establish a new special district court to deal with challenges to immigration laws and the President could then appoint new judges for that court.


57 posted on 03/19/2017 1:06:42 PM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Time for a major “structural reform” to the judicial branch.

It is very difficult to impeach bad federal judges, and must be done one at a time. But structural reform can eliminate and recreate their courts, without them, dozens at a time.

They will still get their full pay and retirement, but they will no longer hear cases or make rulings. Then their reformed court can be brought back with new judges.

Except for the SCOTUS, which is created by the constitution, all subordinate federal courts are under the complete control of congress. So in addition to reorganization, congress can do a major criminal and civil reform as well.

This could mean stripping the lower federal courts of their jurisdiction to hear all kinds of cases that have been used by radical federal judges to “create new laws”. It can also direct the courts to ignore bad precedents, considering cases without reference to them.


58 posted on 03/19/2017 1:10:10 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Leftists aren't fascists. They are "democratic fascists", a completely different thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Why don’t they just cut to the chase and order the US to take in all 65,000,000 refugees.

And if we can survive that onslaught, take on all the refugees next year. And the year after.

In fact, let’s just have a judge declare our borders invalid.

Or impeach any judge who issues rulings that are not based in the law or the Constitution.


64 posted on 03/19/2017 1:14:03 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Why do we even bother with elections when we have judges?

Pray America woke


65 posted on 03/19/2017 1:21:14 PM PDT by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Never happen. If it did it would be slapped around silly. A court cannot interject itself on its own will. It needs somebody with standing to bring action and the only entity with standing to define who and how many immigrants are accepted resides with President Trump, executive authority.


68 posted on 03/19/2017 1:35:09 PM PDT by Fhios (Right now it looks like the condemned dragging their feet on the way to the gallows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Full article as originally posted at Redstate:

http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2017/03/17/more-judicial-tyranny-maryland-judge-may-order-trump-to-double-50000-refugee-limit/


69 posted on 03/19/2017 2:22:03 PM PDT by upchuck (U have not lived today until u have done something for someone who can never repay u ~ John Bunyan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Trump is being defeated by a few communists judges and he is not fighting them. All future Trump EO will be destroyed.


72 posted on 03/19/2017 2:41:31 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Just don’t comply.


73 posted on 03/19/2017 2:58:39 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

Trump needs to tell ALL these judges to “ mind their place “

He needs to issue an EO that states that if ANY terrorism occurs within the United States that the judges who are a party to these TRO’s and other judicial actions will be held as accessories to terrorism and will be held accountable and prosecuted .

These black robed Lib a-holes need to be made to fear . There’s no other way . They have a role in society , but what they are doing these days is NOT the role . They need to be put in their place(s), or held as part of the security problem America MUST deal with .


74 posted on 03/19/2017 3:01:41 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse (America First !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

They need to impeach these judges who make up the law. Congress needs to do it NOW.

Trump needs to ignore the courts on this issue as they have no standing.


75 posted on 03/19/2017 3:15:15 PM PDT by stockpirate (FIRE ALL OBAMA & BUSH APPOINTEES NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

The Islamization of America continues without letting up regardless of what the American people think.


76 posted on 03/19/2017 3:19:05 PM PDT by 353FMG (AMERICA FIRST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java

I did vote for them


80 posted on 03/19/2017 4:04:49 PM PDT by keving (We are the Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java
Trump's travel hold is legal, constitutional and well within the exclusive purview of the President’s executive branch authority, as has been determined by the Supreme Court many times.

This judge has overreached his authority to an impeachable level.

The judges who ruled against his previous travel ban have been over ruled in spectacular fashion by an en banc panel and may now be subject to disciplinary action, including impeachment

In fact, this Hawaii Judge's ruling may be moot because the previous 9th Circuit ruling's have been overturned by the empaneled Judges

81 posted on 03/19/2017 6:16:54 PM PDT by rdcbn (.... when Poets buy guns, tourist season is over ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: COBOL2Java
Trump's travel hold is legal, constitutional and well within the exclusive purview of the President’s executive branch authority, as has been determined by the Supreme Court many times.

This judge has overreached his authority to an impeachable level.

The judges who ruled against his previous travel ban have been over ruled in spectacular fashion by an en banc panel and may now be subject to disciplinary action, including impeachment

In fact, this Hawaii Judge's ruling may be moot because the previous 9th Circuit ruling's have been overturned by the empaneled Judges

82 posted on 03/19/2017 6:16:55 PM PDT by rdcbn (.... when Poets buy guns, tourist season is over ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson