Posted on 03/14/2017 6:27:21 AM PDT by C19fan
A glossary of popular social justice-themed terms, and some not so popular, published by the University of California, Davis plainly asserts that only white people are capable of racism.
According to a glossary drafted by the school’s “LGBTQIA Resource Center,” racism is “the systematic subordination of marginalized racial groups who have relatively little social power in the United States, by members of the agent/dominant/privileged racial group who have relatively more social power.”
(Excerpt) Read more at campusreform.org ...
Thankfully, I don’t identify as white so I am not a racist
Only four types of jobs for losers who throw (probably our) money at these worthless universities: Starbucks, the MSM, paid rioter for Soros, and on a Democrat congresscritter’s staff.
You should lobby for transethnic rights.
Thankfully, I don’t volunteer any funds to UC Davis for “education”.
More than Newspeak. This attempts to redefine “racism” to allow exclusion of any reference to race, or racial characteristics...
In other words, they are trying to define Queer as a racial identity for the purposes of calling sane people racists.
That statement is a perfect example of racism.
Just let one of them try that $hit with me.
When I was a kid “white” was a color. Now it’s the reason why the left wants us eliminated, after taking our money.
Yep. It’s outright PROJECTION, is what it is.
As a ‘racist’ white person and a pervophope i guess it is my ‘privilege’ to ignore ALL knuckle heads of color. As well as screwball same sex and gender alternative advocates.
Wow.
A complete re-write of the definition of racism to suit the political power structure of the left.
How positively Orwellian.
You have to admit. You giggled when you saw UC Davis and Education together.
Im beige and a minority
Don’t fight it...embrace it.
They’re pining for a fight, or, at least an argument.
They’ve decided that if you’re white, then you’re a racist. No matter what you say, they’ll still say that.
Let them blow smoke...let them shout it to the world. It doesn’t matter.
If they had a case, they’d be suing all white people. They don’t.
If the push hard enough, and you stop pushing back, they’ll fall on their collective faces.
The definition of “racist” and “racism” has changed dramatically.
I’m interested in what they current generation of kids will think about the 50s/60s. They’re told that microagresssions (e.g. mistaking a black man for your waiter and asking for water) are worse than “racism” in the 50s. And black employment issues today are worse than 50 years ago (”systemic racism” is more harmful than a manager who won’t hire a black man). And trial by jury is worse than the kkk lynchings because of biased cops, prosecutors, judges, and juries today.
My guess is when grandpa says “racism in my day was bad” the kids will respond “yeah, we know. and you had to walk up hill both ways to get to school”.
The definition of “racist” and “racism” has changed dramatically.
I’m interested in what they current generation of kids will think about the 50s/60s. They’re told that microagresssions (e.g. mistaking a black man for your waiter and asking for water) are worse than “racism” in the 50s. And black employment issues today are worse than 50 years ago (”systemic racism” is more harmful than a manager who won’t hire a black man). And trial by jury is worse than the kkk lynchings because of biased cops, prosecutors, judges, and juries today.
My guess is when grandpa says “racism in my day was bad” the kids will respond “yeah, we know. and you had to walk up hill both ways to get to school”.
They can kiss my white ass. Probably tastes like a cracker.
That’s racist.
well they can kiss my coonass
So, they’re implying non-whites aren’t equal to whites because they can’t be racist even if they want to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.