Posted on 03/12/2017 9:16:12 AM PDT by yoe
Video
I'd win." That's how Hillary Clinton responded when asked at Wellesley College what she would do differently in her failed run for the presidency in 2016. She's deceiving herself.
The Clinton candidacy suffered from many things, but nothing more so than a self-imposed feeling of invulnerability and inevitability. Just do a random search on YouTube if you don't believe it and watch how all the soi-disant experts yammered on and on about how Hillary couldn't lose, Trump was already finished, the election was over.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
The Washington Post always ran the theme that she was the most qualified candidate ever. But they could never show why. Only that they said it. To themselves.
When you're attempting to sell a cr@p sandwich, you focus on the packaging.
More wasted ink on Hitlary and her loss. The bitch lost and that is all that matters.
The left seems to think that we are all a bunch of biased dudes who would never vote for a woman because we are sexist male chauvinist pigs. They don’t care to admit that hillary is a mean lying marxist.
Hitlery lost because she is a venomous harridan!
venomous: expressing very strong hatred or anger
One synonym of venomous is “toxic:” extremely harsh, malicious, or harmful
Harridan: an angry and unpleasant woman
Synonyms and Antonyms of harridan
a bad-tempered scolding woman if you were married to that harridan, you, too, would take to drink.
Synonyms: battle-ax (or battle-axe), dragon lady, fury, harpy, shrew, termagant, virago, vixen
Related Words fishwife, gorgon; carper, castigator, caviler (or caviller), censurer, critic, faultfinder, nitpicker, railer, scold; belittler, derider, detractor; pettifogger, quibbler
(Both definitions/synoynyms FRom https://www.merriam-webster.com/)
I think we all can agree that whether the person be male or female, a person exhibiting angry, unpleasant, extremely harsh, malicious or harmful behavior would not be tolerated in society, much less in elective office once such behavior is widely known!
I would argue that McStain and Romney waged the most incompetent campaigns in US History!
Ophonybama should have NEVER been POTUS, mcuh less re-elected, and we all know it! Even the dum-dums that voted for him!
W’s daddy didn’t run a very good campaign, either!
She was never told she didn’t have a chance in hell this cycle.
Which is it though?
Did she never have a chance?
Or did she throw it away by not putting in an effort?
Without using the words, you accurately identified Hitlery the venomous harridan’s character as being her problem - she is a venomous harridan, and she lost for that reason!
“Open:” Welcomed
“Next Window Please:” Rejected
“No Parking:” Rejected
2 outta 3... not bad!
A great analysis, Billthedrill!
Taxman Bravo Zulu!
HSAT, I believe in my heart of hearts that Hitlery the venomous harridan lost specifically because she is a venomous harridan!
Trump was the right person and “MAGA” was the right slogan Americans needed to understand how evil Hitlery the venomous harridan was and still is.
BTW, there is no equivalent word in the English language for the male version, if you will, of a harridan. But they certainly exist: Ophonybama, Tim Kaine and Chuckie Schumer come readily to mind. Many of the male ABC, CBS, MSNBC, and CNN reporters certainly qualify as male “harridans!”
And, as you might suspect, there are some other men in the public eye who are on my “male harridan list!”
I also have a VERY long list of LIEberal women who, without any doubt whatsoever, are venomous harridans!
“Or did she throw it away by not putting in an effort? “
—
She had the DNC behind her.
When Bernie surged the way that he did the DNC ignored it———it was Hillary’s turn,so she just sat back and relaxed, waiting for the coronation.
The DNC lost the election for her——MANY Dems despised her.
.
.
The one explanation doesn't exclude the other. If her team actually thought they were losing those states they would have been in a real panic going into the election, and they weren't. So they had to have had some (over-)confidence that they'd win there.
That doesn't exclude the possibility that they might have thought that campaigning in those states might actually bring her numbers down, but when somebody's overconfident they don't generally think that way. I think they just assumed they'd win there, and the chance of winning in other states that they didn't expect to carry (Arizona, North Carolina) dazzled and confused them so they forgot about Michigan and Wisconsin.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign was awful, it was only partisanship to the extreme that had her almost win.
The only thing that amazed me about the election result was
that Trump didn’t win by a much larger margin.
********
The Electoral College worked. Trump lost the popular vote
but won the Electoral vote.
But wasn't the term "deplorables" focus-group tested by the Democrat political gurus? She used it a few times before it all blew up in her face.
incompetence + worthlessness + unlikability + ill health = loss
She is also preachy, screechy, irritating and fugly.
Hillary lost because she’s a globmunist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.