Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Insta-protest: Critics erupt over ‘Muslim ban’
The Washington Times ^ | 3/6/2017 | Jennifer Harper

Posted on 03/06/2017 9:56:01 PM PST by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

Islam is sedition.


21 posted on 03/06/2017 10:39:54 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

Did someone think it was actually possible to appease liberals/muslims/MSM (I’m aware of the overlap)? That’s cute.


22 posted on 03/06/2017 11:48:16 PM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

I’ve skimmed the order. It reads like a trial brief—well supported by relevant statutes and case law. A real snooze to read, but not something that could be challenged on any legal grounds.

The President was always on terra firma with 8 USC Sec 1182 (f) standing on its own. But, it had to be completely overhauled to appease Constitution free liberal activist judges.

The facts of this case should terrify you.


23 posted on 03/06/2017 11:55:39 PM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

I’m a bit bummed that the bit about giving preference to religious minorities was taken out of the new EO.


24 posted on 03/07/2017 1:33:26 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC
Furious is more like it. President Trump’s revised, temporary ban on refugee travel from six Middle Eastern nations continues to draw an immediate outcry from his very well-organized critics.

I hope that these very well-organized critics can organize themselves to help to develop a viable deep-vetting process for the countries affected by the ban. That kind of positive action would contribute to the removal of the ban on countries that comply with the vetting.

All they have to do is emulate the vetting process in Iraq, a country recently removed from the list of banned countries.

Are their hate-filled brains too addled to apply some common sense, and contribute to the safety of our nation?

25 posted on 03/07/2017 3:10:48 AM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose
I’ve skimmed the order. It reads like a trial brief—well supported by relevant statutes and case law. A real snooze to read, but not something that could be challenged on any legal grounds.

Yes, I see that they put in their defense of the first EO which they are withdrawing, as well as pre-emptive justifications for this one. But I doubt that will stop some activist judge and the ACLU from trying to hang it up in court.

Of course, hopefully they have been conducting their review all this time anyway.

26 posted on 03/07/2017 4:24:28 AM PST by Old_Grouch (69 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC
Oh come on.

Muslims from Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, the large Muslim minority in India, Malaysia and Indonesia are still allowed in the USA. That is in effect the vast majority of the world's Muslim population.

27 posted on 03/07/2017 5:33:32 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

“why do people who are not muslim themselves so zealous about creating a muslim society in the US?”

They don’t. If Trump was for unlimited Muslim immigration they would protest that. It’s all about Trump hatred and being butthurt from losing. Eight years of participation trophies and these people simply can’t handle reality. (I wish it WAS a Muslim ban.)


28 posted on 03/07/2017 7:16:25 AM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

Put her picture on every ISIS - “GO FIGHT IN AMERICA” recruiting poster.

Not one young terrorist will make it west of Cairo.


29 posted on 03/07/2017 7:42:15 AM PST by Strac6 ("We sleep safe in our beds only because rough men stand ready to visit violence on the enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

What would happen to these brave patriotic pro mooslim women if they traveled to terrorist hotbeds in the middle east donning their American flag burkas and head scarves? Would they be greeted with equally tolerant open arms?


30 posted on 03/07/2017 8:48:26 AM PST by Stopthethreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC

What a joke.

The one thing muslim refugees will never drape over themselves is an American flag.


31 posted on 03/07/2017 9:26:07 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Check out fugly Muslimah bitch Saba Ahmed who wore an American flag hijab just to irk us “infidels”, until credible threats forced its removal.


32 posted on 03/07/2017 10:23:22 AM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson