[jazminerose]

I’ve skimmed the order. It reads like a trial brief—well supported by relevant statutes and case law. A real snooze to read, but not something that could be challenged on any legal grounds.

The President was always on terra firma with 8 USC Sec 1182 (f) standing on its own. But, it had to be completely overhauled to appease Constitution free liberal activist judges.

The facts of this case should terrify you.

[Old_Grouch]

I’ve skimmed the order. It reads like a trial brief—well supported by relevant statutes and case law. A real snooze to read, but not something that could be challenged on any legal grounds.

Yes, I see that they put in their defense of the first EO which they are withdrawing, as well as pre-emptive justifications for this one. But I doubt that will stop some activist judge and the ACLU from trying to hang it up in court.

Of course, hopefully they have been conducting their review all this time anyway.