Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Declining to dress first lady isn't like refusing to bake same-sex cake.
Washington Post ^ | 1/18/2017 | Steven Petrow

Posted on 01/19/2017 9:27:09 AM PST by Weeble

Last month, after designers Tom Ford and Marc Jacobs, and others, said that they would refuse to dress Melania, Bryan Fischer, the uber-conservative host of the show “Focal Point” on American Family Radio, added to the social-media controversy when he tweeted what appeared to be a simple question: “If a baker can be forced to bake a cake for homosexuals, can a dressmaker be forced to make a dress for Melania?”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fascism; fashion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Refusing to dress Melania is not the same as refusing to bake a same-sex cake. One is all about abusing the force of government, about fascism under the threat of financial loss, imprisonment and even violence in violation of one's first amendment rights to worship as one chooses. The other is about what to wear.
1 posted on 01/19/2017 9:27:09 AM PST by Weeble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Weeble

Answer: No, because we say so.


2 posted on 01/19/2017 9:30:48 AM PST by Mr. K ( Trump kicked her ass 2-to-1 if you remove all the voter fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble
Of course they're not the same. bakers who refuse to bake cakes for gay 'weddings' sre Christians. Designers who refuse to dress Melania are left wing, homosexual loving deviants.

Christian = Bad

Left wing, homosexual deviant = Good.

What could be simpler?

3 posted on 01/19/2017 9:33:10 AM PST by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

Cant have it both ways. Either a business has the 1st Amendment freedom of association or it does not.

If it does have the freedom, then it also has the freedom to NOT associate. That would empower businesses to decide who they want as customers.

If it does not have the freedom, then the business CANT REFUSE SERVICE TO ANYONE.


4 posted on 01/19/2017 9:33:40 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble
I will not participate in baking a cake for or associating in any way with the next gay wedding,” calling out the rhetoric of “racism, sexism, and xenophobia” in the homonazi's campaign"

The author not only fails to make his desired point, he makes our point for us.

Yes, I did change 3 things from his quote.

5 posted on 01/19/2017 9:35:07 AM PST by Principled (OMG I'm so tired of all this winning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

What gays think is important and needs all our support. What Christians think, isn’t, and doesn’t. In fact. the word, and the very idea, of “Christian” is missing from this article.

“Christian?” What’s that?


6 posted on 01/19/2017 9:35:54 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble
Steven Petrow is the owner of website www.gaymanners.com, and is past president of the past of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

7 posted on 01/19/2017 9:36:16 AM PST by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

Tom Ford’s as delusional as CNN and ‘DC snowflakes’.

He WAS NEVER asked to dress the first lady... he’s just a jerk. Boycott his crappy ‘products’...


8 posted on 01/19/2017 9:36:41 AM PST by GOPJ (MSNBC didn't 'get' Trump or his base and damn sure don't get 'Drain the Swamp so STFU about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

9 posted on 01/19/2017 9:38:14 AM PST by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Christian = Bad

Left wing, homosexual deviant = Good.

What could be simpler?


That sounds oddly like how the Bible describes the world of the end times.

Just sayin’.


10 posted on 01/19/2017 9:39:19 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

11 posted on 01/19/2017 9:39:31 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

Bullshit.


12 posted on 01/19/2017 9:40:40 AM PST by JusPasenThru (SJW is the weaponization of compassion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

I read that article. Incredible dreck.


13 posted on 01/19/2017 9:43:03 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

If I was Melania, I would find the ugliest Tom Ford design on the rack to wear to the Inauguration.

Yeah, I’m mean that way.


14 posted on 01/19/2017 9:43:29 AM PST by Spirit of Liberty (It's morning in America again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas
That sounds oddly like how the Bible describes the world of the end times. Just sayin’.

yep!

15 posted on 01/19/2017 9:46:42 AM PST by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Hmmmm..... plank stuck in the editor’s eye at the WaPo.


16 posted on 01/19/2017 9:46:59 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

Of course not. “It isn’t discrimination when we do it.” Right.


17 posted on 01/19/2017 9:49:51 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

The answer is that “some animals are more equal than others.”


18 posted on 01/19/2017 9:52:31 AM PST by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“Christian” shouldn’t be needed, actually. Even pagan business owners should be able to operate according to their conscience in a free society. This is about freedom, not religion.


19 posted on 01/19/2017 9:54:32 AM PST by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Weeble

At least they’re on the defensive about this stupid and honestly unconstitutional law forcing people to act against their conscience and religious belief due to some warped interpretation of equality.


20 posted on 01/19/2017 9:55:45 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson