Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Confront F.B.I. Chief at Closed-Door Intelligence Briefing (NY Slimes alert!)
The New York Slimes ^ | 2017-01-13 | MATTHEW ROSENBERG and ADAM GOLDMAN

Posted on 01/13/2017 6:52:49 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

WASHINGTON — America’s intelligence chiefs sat down with members of Congress behind closed doors on Friday for what they thought would be a straightforward briefing on Russian cyberattacks. What ensued instead was a confrontation Democrats have long sought with James B. Comey, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Why, the House Democrats demanded to know, did Mr. Comey believe it was O.K. to make repeated disclosures during the campaign about the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails but to this day refuse to say if the F.B.I. is investigating links between the Trump campaign and Russia?

His answers did not prove very satisfying. Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the minority leader, grew so frustrated that at one point she chastised Mr. Comey for being “condescending to members.”

Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, who was chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee when it was hacked, asked why Mr. Comey had never called her about the intrusions, which began in August 2015 and continued over the course of many months. The F.B.I. notified the committee of the original hacking, but reached a low-level tech support contractor and went back and forth with him for months before the leadership of the organization was informed and took steps to halt the intrusion.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 201508; 2016election; 201701; august2015; comey; dnc; hacking; pelosi; wassermanschultz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 01/13/2017 6:52:49 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s like asking J. Edgar Hoover why he wouldn’t help Henry Wallace cheat.


2 posted on 01/13/2017 6:56:22 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The issue is never the issue. The issue is the revolution.


3 posted on 01/13/2017 6:57:53 PM PST by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ironic in view of Democrats’ refusal to allow FBI to examine DNC server for hacking vulnerabilities.

Now they complain the FBI refused to do its job.

Their chutzpah is rich, indeed.


4 posted on 01/13/2017 6:59:08 PM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A trap to create more anonymous leaks. Six more days of Obamaleaks nonsense.


5 posted on 01/13/2017 7:02:36 PM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Was the issue of Hillary’s emails being on a pedophile’s computer brought up???


6 posted on 01/13/2017 7:04:48 PM PST by Organic Panic (Rich White Man Evicts Poor Black Family From Public Housing - MSNBCPBSCNNNYTABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Yup.

There’s also a fundamental difference between notice of investigating a particular individual’s crimes, and investigation of crimes against an individual.


7 posted on 01/13/2017 7:05:11 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They have succeeded in discounting what the Democrats and Hillary were caught doing while indicting anyone who may have been the Whistleblower.

It’s like the Republicans going after Deep Throat when Watergate happened.


8 posted on 01/13/2017 7:06:28 PM PST by Kickass Conservative ( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Democrats are acting like the Nazis did in March 1945.


9 posted on 01/13/2017 7:09:25 PM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

“The issue is never the issue. The issue is the revolution.”

This.


10 posted on 01/13/2017 7:09:47 PM PST by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hey Democrat dummies: why didn’t Clinton turn over all email? Why did she conduct official business on an illegal server?

Complain about the consequences of investigation all you want. Don’t do the crime and you won’t have these problems.

At the center of all this is the desire to affix blame for Clinton’s loss. It certainly couldn’t be Clinton’s fault.


11 posted on 01/13/2017 7:11:55 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It sounds like the democrats are furious that the FBI would not corroborate the “ Russian hacking” meme which begs the question, who is “ the intelligence community” that signed off on this report. Other than Brennan and Clapper


12 posted on 01/13/2017 7:15:40 PM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

H->!’s emails is where the focus needs to centered.


13 posted on 01/13/2017 7:17:51 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

DNC REFUSED TO ALLOW FBI ACCESS TO HACKED SERVER

1-10-17 THE HILL

The FBI requested direct access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) hacked computer servers but was denied, Director James Comey told lawmakers on Tuesday.

The bureau made “multiple requests at different levels,” according to Comey, but ultimately struck an agreement with the DNC that a “highly respected private company” would get access and share what it found with investigators.

“We’d always prefer to have access hands-on ourselves if that’s possible,” Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request. . .

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/313555-comey-fbi-did-request-access-to-hacked-dnc-servers


14 posted on 01/13/2017 7:17:57 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Brennan had the video appear just in time for Benghazi


15 posted on 01/13/2017 7:18:47 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

> Comey said, noting that he didn’t know why the DNC rebuffed the FBI’s request.

The Democrats are engaged in a massive propaganda campaign. Only those who will support the narrative are allowed access.


16 posted on 01/13/2017 7:21:58 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

FBI warned Clinton campaign in Spring, campaign refused to allow FBI to examine email info and logs...

Isikoff article from July 2016:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-hillary-clinton-cyber-attack-000000269.html


17 posted on 01/13/2017 7:23:31 PM PST by vicdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Her name says everything...

Pelosi = PelOSI

18 posted on 01/13/2017 7:24:47 PM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why, the House Democrats demanded to know, did Mr. Comey believe it was O.K. to make repeated disclosures during the campaign about the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails but to this day refuse to say if the F.B.I. is investigating links between the Trump campaign and Russia?

Because the voters with the guns were getting agitated... 😀

19 posted on 01/13/2017 7:26:45 PM PST by kiryandil (Will Hillary's BrownShirt Media thugs demand that The Deplorables all wear six-pointed Orange Stars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Many federal employees are protected from retaliation for reporting legal violations or government waste or fraud by the government agencies they work for. Federal employee whistleblowers are protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (WPA) and the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012. Read below for more information about what qualifies as whistleblowing in the federal government, and what actions are considered retaliation for whistleblowing.

Workplace fairness is everyones job.


20 posted on 01/13/2017 7:28:33 PM PST by Pic7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson