How does a man who thinks he’s a woman and doesn’t play one on tv have a hysterectomy? What am I missing and how does the Catholic Church play a part?!
This is a woman who thinks she's a man.
Someone on FR came up with the easiest way to tell whether it's a woman thinking it's a man or a man thinking it's a woman ...
When you see the words "transgender man" or "transgender woman" or "trans-man" or "trans-woman", insert the word "fake" in place of "transgender" or "trans". After that, it's easy to see what's going on ...
I could be wrong - because with these silly transgender stories it can be difficult to tell whether it’s really a man or women beings discussed - but I think it was a woman who was “transitioning” into a woman (an impossibility, of course). Hence, they refer to her as “A transgender man”.
This is a woman who thinks she's a man.
Someone on FR came up with the easiest way to tell whether it's a woman thinking it's a man or a man thinking it's a woman ...
When you see the words "transgender man" or "transgender woman" or "trans-man" or "trans-woman", insert the word "fake" in place of "transgender" or "trans". After that, it's easy to see what's going on ...
She’s a woman. She wanted the hysterectomy to further her delusion that she’s a man. Her doctor supported her. The hospital opposed an unnecessary major surgery on a mentally ill person.
This is a twofer for Marxist perverts.First,if successful it confirms the concept that one can actually change his/her gender and that physicians and surgeons are required to play along with those delusions.Second,successful or not it damages a Catholic hospital.The destruction of Catholic hospitals has been a goal of Marxists for a long,long time.I mean,we can't have hospitals that actually refuse to do abortions,can we!
Ike confused woman, Jionni Conforti, ended up being surgically mutilated 3 months later, of course at a different hospital. She decided to sue the Catholic hospital for big bucks for the “humiliation” of being refused “transgender care”.
I think she knew perfectly well that it is forbidden by Catholic Health Ethics (and every “ETHICS” rooted in physical reality) to intentionally maim a patient. That means deliberately removing or impairing a limb, organ or system, destroying the normal function, if said organ is not diseased, cancerous or whatever.
Doesn’t matter if it’s a sex organ or an eye, leg, ear or any other organ. Doesn’t matter if its a male or a female. Doesn’t matter if they asked you to do it.
Catholic hospitals do not “maim on demand”.
A normal, observant Catholic would rather be fined or be imprisoned than to cooperate in any way with mutilating a mentally disturbed patient.
The patient intentionally targeted this particular hospital because she is severely anti-reality, severely anti-Catholic, severely greedy for big bucks, or all of the above.
It’s a woman who things she can be a man. All she has to do is plug up one device and bolt on another and voila! she’s certifiable.
“”How does a man who thinks he’s a woman””
I’m confused - I read it as a woman with all the female plumbing who thinks she’s a man..and needs/wants to have the female parts removed. Right or wrong?
I’m too old to “get with” any of this nonsense.
The headline seems misleading, but the real reason is the this so-called ‘man” was really born a woman and now wants to have surgery to eliminate her/his female sex organs, i.e. ovaries and uterus.
So it’s a case of a he who is really a she wanting to have the hospital mutilate her/his body so he/she feels more comfortable.