Posted on 12/15/2016 11:14:42 AM PST by GonzoII
Brought to you by Desert Diamond: http://ddcaz.com Sheriff Joe Arpaio Press Conference on Obama Birth Certificate to be streamed LIVE this afternoon.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/06/04/dreams-from-his-stepfather/
EXCERPT:
The young Obama is fascinated by the deep scars on Lolo’s legs, leech marks from his stepfather’s time as a conscript in the revolutionary army in New Guinea.
‘I encourage you all to keep seeking the truth.’
The Anna Toot theory is the antithesis of a search for the truth. People who genuinely seek the truth do not use any means necessary to silence differing views. The only people who engage in slander and lies to silence those who disagree with them are people defending seeking to evade the truth.
Here are a few examples. Honest, open debate would mean death to the Man-made Global Warming theory. Therefore the proponents use every tool at their disposal to delegitimize and silence opposing views. They aren’t seeking the truth; they are suppressing it.
Ditto the proponents of Political Correctness. The purpose of the entire construct is to silence opposition. The tenets of PC could not survive a fair and open debate. Therefore PCers attempt to silence the opposition, and to the extent they are able, even to criminalize it. [Similar to vilifying a person merely for mentioning a highly respected conservative like Jack Cashill. The goal is not truth, but suppression.]
Islamists certainly use the same approach. While in the minority, they resort to coercion, manipulation, and slander in an attempt to silence any discussion of the horrors of Islam. As their population grows, their methods of silencing the opposition escalate.
Look back through this thread. There is some sickeningly malicious and vile gossip in certain posts. It’s not there in pursuit of the truth. It’s there solely in an attempt to silence dissent. It’s repulsive and disgusting, and is incompatible with anything related to truth. But it’s a method that has been supported by proponents of the Anna Toot theory from the beginning. Truth has never been the objective. The objective has always been to attack, and if possible destroy, anyone who disagrees. This should embarrass and mortify anyone who genuinely seeks the truth.
(Note also the cultish behavior. Anyone who supports the Anna Toot theory = good. Anyone who doesn’t support it = bad. Pure cultish manipulation. Honest, decent people do not behave this way—or approve of those who do.)
I, Cashill, and numerous others think Stanley Dunham looks like Obama.My laptop's wifi's software configuration somehow went bad last week and no longer connects to my wifi router modem (this post is from my desktop) and, between Christmas and spending way too many hours fiddling with my laptop (I am an engineer, after all), I haven't even read FR for the last several days, but this topic still fascinates me (who really is aka obama? Don't care what the answer is as long as it is true and known).
Personally, I don't think aka obama looks at all like Stanley Ann (but he does look like her father for me to believe it is plausible that he could possibly be his son or, much less likely, his grandson). However, if you are going to go by looks (which is no kind of proof at all), to me aka obama looks like a perfect blend of Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf. He has her eyes (she at his current age) and his ears match both parents. YMMV
I wish I knew what evidence place those two together in order to conceive the criminal-identity-fraud-and-cheat who is currently squatting in the White Mosque.
It’s not a vivid imagination or lizard skin. The baby has a shiny white halo around the head that is inconsistent with the floral colored blanket. You can not explain that with sunlight filtered though the trees. And it doesn’t explain her bulbous nose or the missing ears which used to be pretty large.
Bill Ayers writes a book of fabricated stories and despite of inconsistencies, everyone swallows using it as a point of reference. The same people present a bucket load of family photos to support Ayer’s tale and you accept them at face value. No doubt many of the events occurred, but they routinely tamper with the photos to change them. The purpose could be to make a prettier picture, to omit conflicting characters and detail or to present a completely false scenario. Here’s what one of the more clever photoshop artists on FR had to say about the earlier 0 family photo album:
“Some of these Photoshops are indeed ridiculous. As somebody who makes a bunch just for fun, I wouldn’t even post some of these because they even look stupid for Photoshops, let alone passing them off as actual untouched photographs.”
Let’s ping FR ‘Death’ and see what he thinks of this Indonesian set of photos.
I do ‘get’ the story line and that 0 was supposed to be in Indonesia. But he either looked very different so they hide his face, or it was some other kid, not potus ‘44. There are some people in photographs that they do not want identified, so they have been cut out and patched over or substituted. And they may have borrowed photos of his supposed relatives as children to help round out his time line.
In the sitting Lolo -Granny picture, 0 may be genuine to the photo, but there was certainly a cutout and substitution in that photograph behind him as evidenced by the mismatched clothing of the women and the leftover digital artifacts.
Third-grade photo capture's [sic] Obama's grin (3rd grade in Hawaii?)
Did you see post 485? That juxtaposition is called—not by me—Stanley Dunham is a White Obama.
Fantasywriter, you are the one acts like they are from Never-Neverland. There has been no slander or lies or malicious gossip as you describe. It’s truly all in your head and the discussion continues. Your comment is an attempt to shut down open conversation and debate and it has been repeated ad nauseam. Your opinion differs, big freaking deal, no one really cares. I know that I don’t. People don’t always agree, deal with it based upon facts rather than whiney ad hominem attacks.
No one is going to reverse course because you have no authority and have been ineffective in proving your point. No one here is forced to ‘goose-step’ to your commands any more than they are inclined to accept the false premises of Billy Ayers. Between Ayer’s lies people here continue to ferret out the truth.
Your continuous objection to Anna Toot leads me more inclined to accept that there is something important there to the name, Anna Toot. Anna Toot is not Stanley Ann, it is a distinctive name from a much more reliable source than Ayers. It’s doubtful a man would confuse the name of his wife when writing to or telephoning his family.
The real question should be...Was there ever really a Stanley Ann? It’s a really horrible name for a baby girl. Oh yea, I’ll name my daughter Larry Sue, Mikey Lynn or Donald Marie. Or was her real name Shirley? That’s what her very own Aunt called her. She should know her only niece’s name.
No one calls their Grandmother Toot or Toots or Tootie. It’s as derogatory and disrespectful today as it would have been in 1960. Just because Billy Ayers wrote it doesn’t make it true. In fact the more he detailed and focused on this issue, the more you should be certain that he’s cloaking a problem with the truth.
Truth is the objective regardless of where opinions may differ. You are unable to accept varying opinions and discussion and that is your own sad little frustration. Rather than be so distressed and unhappy, why not just choose another thread.
Here’s the link from 485:
https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/24/what-does-black-and-white-look-like-anyway/
‘Rather than be so distressed and unhappy, why not just choose another thread.’
Only God knows how I feel. You are not God.
This is the second time now you’ve told me how I was feeling. Both times you’ve been 100% wrong. What’s with your fixation with assigning feelings to me ? Is it projection?
Thanks, I needed that!
Looking at that thread about Scott and Barry in Hawaii at the same time he claims to be in Indonesia is perplexing. Some insist the photo is fake, but the motivation for 0 to fake this one is unclear since it questions the reliability of his timeline and tale.
Since he claims he was sent to Hawaii at ten years old, perhaps he was merely visiting a 3rd grade class room specifically for a Christmas program.
It’s not projection. It’s a response to your post which is littered with negative hyperbole. There is no ‘sickeningly malicious and vile gossip.’... There is civil discussion. There is pursuit of the truth. There’s no attempt to silence dissent. If you find it “repulsive and disgusting” that’s a crying shame.
There is no Anna Toot ‘theory’ since her name originated from the Kenyans. Her name conflicts with Ayer’s story and upsets your apple cart. So be it.
Equating the thread to global warming alarmists, PC speech, islamists, vilifying Cashill, or a cult is absurd. It’s a mere discussion and analysis of facts as they appear. It’s a voluntary exchange of complicated ideas and leads to decipher the truth. Once again, participation is completely voluntary.
There’s something to be said about the subliminal messaging that occurs when deceivers photoshop faces. One of the more successful ways to suggest a familial relationship is with the eyes and then facial shape.
That being said, Paul McCartney looks like the twin brother to Dunham. Give him more hair and they could become identical twins.
You’ve been here how long, BGS? Nine months? Closer to ten? And you merrily prattle on, telling me what I’ve personally experienced over the past roughly seven years?
How do you do that? Are you a retread? Do you actually go back that far, just under a different name?
If this is your first iteration, then how did you aquire such extensive knowledge? It’s not every day that a relatively new sign up lectures me on what has and hasn’t happened over so a wide span of years.
Tell you what—I’ll make a deal with you. If you can identify the single most obnoxious post that was made to me on this thread, and give a complete and accurate account of what made it outstandingly vile, I will publicly acknowledge that in fact you DO know what you’re talking about.
It’s very simple, very easy and straightforward. If you succeed, you win. If not, you demonstrate dispositively that you have no earthly idea what you’re talking about.
So let’s see what you have, once and for all.
I never commented on what you have been through for a decade, only about the current posts which are misaligned with the current discussion. Lecturing is not my intent, correcting false accusations would be a more accurate description. You can make your deals and play your game with someone else. There’s no interest in examining your decade of posting history- none at all. Winning is discovering the truth, not playing your games.
What is remarkable are the descriptors utilized in your current posts #716, #702 and #606, which is why I responded and ‘merrily prattled on’ (love that phrase). These are your own words from your past two writings: ‘obnoxious post’ -’outstandingly vile’ -’sickeningly malicious and vile gossip’- ‘repulsive and disgusting’-’embarrass and mortify’ -’cultish behavior’- ‘ bad. Pure cultish manipulation’... Clearly, these posts are failed attempts to attack and suppress freedom of thought. Researchers and interested parties will continue to explore credible leads where they may lead.
If someone finds a new lead - Sir Paul’s uncanny resemblance to the 0 nanny, ‘Let it Be!’ What if the image creator was a Beatles’ fan with a sense of humor and chose a familiar face for ‘Mum.’ Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. And dna is the only absolute truth. With dna, the debate moves to the names of his handlers and the names of his financiers, especially if his dna result is unimpressive or a completely new surprise.
‘What is remarkable are the descriptors utilized in your current posts #716, #702 and #606, which is why I responded and ‘merrily prattled on’ (love that phrase). These are your own words from your past two writings: ‘obnoxious post’ -’outstandingly vile’ -’sickeningly malicious and vile gossip’- ‘repulsive and disgusting’-’embarrass and mortify’ -’cultish behavior’- ‘ bad. Pure cultish manipulation’...’
As far as you know, everything I wrote was true. If you’re unable to identify the single most disgusting post (made to me) on THIS THREAD [which you are] then you have no idea how bad it was. It may have been even worse than my description. It may have been FAR worse. You simply have no idea, and no way (apparently) of finding out.
Iow, you have no earthly idea what you’re talking about. You never did. You’re completely and utterly clueless.
YOU LOSE.
Now enough with the self-righteous preaching. It got old long ago.
.jpg)
Malcolm X was 6’ 4”, that explains a great deal, thanks.
Have the other men in the photo been identified.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.