You’ve been here how long, BGS? Nine months? Closer to ten? And you merrily prattle on, telling me what I’ve personally experienced over the past roughly seven years?
How do you do that? Are you a retread? Do you actually go back that far, just under a different name?
If this is your first iteration, then how did you aquire such extensive knowledge? It’s not every day that a relatively new sign up lectures me on what has and hasn’t happened over so a wide span of years.
Tell you what—I’ll make a deal with you. If you can identify the single most obnoxious post that was made to me on this thread, and give a complete and accurate account of what made it outstandingly vile, I will publicly acknowledge that in fact you DO know what you’re talking about.
It’s very simple, very easy and straightforward. If you succeed, you win. If not, you demonstrate dispositively that you have no earthly idea what you’re talking about.
So let’s see what you have, once and for all.
I never commented on what you have been through for a decade, only about the current posts which are misaligned with the current discussion. Lecturing is not my intent, correcting false accusations would be a more accurate description. You can make your deals and play your game with someone else. There’s no interest in examining your decade of posting history- none at all. Winning is discovering the truth, not playing your games.
What is remarkable are the descriptors utilized in your current posts #716, #702 and #606, which is why I responded and ‘merrily prattled on’ (love that phrase). These are your own words from your past two writings: ‘obnoxious post’ -’outstandingly vile’ -’sickeningly malicious and vile gossip’- ‘repulsive and disgusting’-’embarrass and mortify’ -’cultish behavior’- ‘ bad. Pure cultish manipulation’... Clearly, these posts are failed attempts to attack and suppress freedom of thought. Researchers and interested parties will continue to explore credible leads where they may lead.
If someone finds a new lead - Sir Paul’s uncanny resemblance to the 0 nanny, ‘Let it Be!’ What if the image creator was a Beatles’ fan with a sense of humor and chose a familiar face for ‘Mum.’ Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction. And dna is the only absolute truth. With dna, the debate moves to the names of his handlers and the names of his financiers, especially if his dna result is unimpressive or a completely new surprise.