Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY ISN'T THIS USED IN FOREST FIRES ?
youtube ^ | The Backyard Scientist

Posted on 12/08/2016 7:36:17 AM PST by knarf

While noodling around youtube, I came across this interesting video and I immediately thought of the fire in Tennessee.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fireretardation; fires; forestfires; wildfires
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: crz

what?


21 posted on 12/08/2016 8:28:16 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

"....pretty cool till the family mutt jumped into the pool and grab a piece of dry ice.....and his entails came out under his real tail"

22 posted on 12/08/2016 8:28:45 AM PST by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Also, the area would need to be cleared of personnel, who would otherwise be smothered too (along with most of the fauna).


23 posted on 12/08/2016 8:41:24 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knarf

If it were possible to get at a reasonable cost, a Halon-based extinguisher (which puts out flames by chemical action rather than by smothering, and has a low toxicity to people and animals) would be the way to go.


24 posted on 12/08/2016 8:43:55 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Liquid nitrogen, in quantity, is about 1,000x more expensive than liquid water. Also, keeping it liquid while you are trying to get it to a fire requires massive amounts of specialized cooling equipment to keep it at -320 degrees F. Handling equipment is also problematic; one can’t just pump it through a fire hose, the hose would facture or explode.

Also, except for the immediate removal of heat in the area where it strikes the ground/water/flames, it returns to it’s gaseous state almost immediately. As a gas, it can only smother a fire where water can smother and remove heat over longer periods of time.

It’s just not worth it.

BTW: That idiot in the video with no protective gear on is lucky to have any skin left on his hands, feet or legs! A slip and he would have instantly frozen his skin and probably lost toes and fingers.


25 posted on 12/08/2016 8:45:21 AM PST by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Some fires are NOT a bad thing for forests depending on the timber type.

Yet, whole tree skidding simulates fire. We can prevent these fires from happening, EVEN if human caused, if they would let us MANAGE THE FORESTS LIKE THEY SHOULD be managed.

I could write you page after page after page on this.


26 posted on 12/08/2016 8:49:11 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: knarf

hmmm - what if you dropped pressurized containers of liquid nitrogen into the hottest parts of the fire - the resulting explosion and pressure wave might act similar to the way they use nitro/dynamite to shutoff oil-well fires. Wouldn’t want to do it anywhere near a firefighter due to possible shrapnel, but....


27 posted on 12/08/2016 8:53:32 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

Watermellons!?


28 posted on 12/08/2016 8:53:47 AM PST by Afterguard (Deplorable me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Freeport
Amen to the idiot, it is the idea that intrigued me.

GREAT replies.

29 posted on 12/08/2016 8:55:56 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

oh - take the idea for pressure wave with nitrogen and replace it with frozen pressure vessels of water would still get a pressure wave - question is would it be as quick or effective?


30 posted on 12/08/2016 8:56:32 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

Hmmm is right ... what if ....


31 posted on 12/08/2016 8:57:21 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I always understood (from old navy days) that halon needed to be win a fairly confined space to really work effectively - wouldn’t atmospheric dispersion reduce it’s ability to work?


32 posted on 12/08/2016 8:58:08 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mikemoose

That’s a VERY intriguing idea. (artillery firing firefighting rounds of some sort)


33 posted on 12/08/2016 9:00:08 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

Maybe that was also because there wasn’t a whole lot of halon in a discharge. If that problem could be overcome (large quantities, and maybe a halon-oxygen mix that would avert smothering problems for humans and beasts caught in it) then we’d have something that could be dumped on a large fire to put it out with little or no harm to humans and beasts.


34 posted on 12/08/2016 9:04:34 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: knarf
This page prolly explains why it wont work.

Crazy energy to make liquid nitrogen. and you would need A LOT OF IT.

35 posted on 12/08/2016 9:27:20 AM PST by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Cats are soooo devious............


36 posted on 12/08/2016 9:36:29 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

You could be right - the nice thing is the forest wouldn’t be a concern about electronics damage from the residue LOL


37 posted on 12/08/2016 9:38:42 AM PST by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: knarf

His voice sounds like that genius guy on “Criminal Minds.”


38 posted on 12/08/2016 9:40:12 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo."--Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

The global ozone holeists, now global warmists, now climate changeists, would wring our necks for it, however.


39 posted on 12/08/2016 9:41:56 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

Screwing around with liquid nitrogen without safety equipment is a BAD idea.
_________________________

Not trying to be a wiseass, but is it because its so cold? You could snap a hand off if it got caught in it?


40 posted on 12/08/2016 9:46:36 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson