Posted on 12/03/2016 3:23:37 AM PST by JediJones
Sarah needs to remember that the American worker has not been working on a level playing field for a very long time. I’m all for libertarian thought, but how about bringing things back level before we talk about the government staying out of things. Companies have been rewarded for moving their jobs to cheap labor countries, talk about crony capitalism.
If we don’t have jobs in America, who is going to buy all the stuff these dummies are producing out of country?
(1) How is this “crony capitalism” and (2) I guess Governor Palin didn’t get a role she wanted in the Trump admin?
Seems like it. Both Carrier’s parent company, United Technology and Ford, should be instead OR ALSO put on notice that they will not get any US government contracts if they shift work overseas. As the world’s largest contractor, that threat would give them serious pause to moving parts of their companies overseas. It is a threat that Trump should use.
Companies, both domestic and foreign, need incentivized to locate and produce in America, but on a universal not an individual basis.
I'm willing to give Trump a pass on this and the potential Ford negotiations, after all, he's not in office yet, but in the long term we can't proceed on one-off deals.
I also agree that we need to keep a sharp eye on Mr. Trump to ensure he doesn't over indulge his autocratic tendencies.
Why? She's right.
And that makes it right?? Bribes are bribes and bad policy.
Did you read the article?
Did you get as far as the ninth paragraph?
It's clear - to anyone who read the article - that Sarah is not accusing Trump of anything. She is reiterating what ought to be a commonsense caution.
This entire thread is full of noise.
FReepers, read the article.
Just shut up Sarah! Why don’t you go find some reality show to do.
That “If” in your second sentence is what’s being ignored. People are treating her statement as if she used the word “Since”.
Since we don’t even know if a “deal” was made this is a feckless article by Mrs Palin
Once she states she has no idea of the details all else is meaningless
“But this time-tested truth assumes we’re operating on a level playing field.”
Does she really, really believe that NAFTA creates a level playing field?
When the rubber meets the road, business theorists lose to reality.
Business is done by people, not companies. That is, business is done by people not companies.
The term crony capitalists is sour grapes and anguish by those who have no ability to do anything but carp.
It is likely that Trump knows the Chairman of United technologies and called him on the phone. His message, we need a little help in Indiana. Are you counting on the military contracts for next year?
the deal was essentially done
It has been reported that Palin said the deal was an example of crony capitalism. From reading the excerpt, I see the reports were false.
She makes valid, constructive points.
Do you really, really believe that Sarah Palin believes that NAFTA creates a level playing field?
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. I get tired of listening to these “conservatives” talking about theoretical ideas.
Fact is Mexico, China and others are taking advantage of our extreme regulations and high taxes to simply steal away our businesses. And they’re succeeding thanks to the globalist who deliberately want companies to move off shore. Offering Carrier and others tax breaks and incentives in the short term is no different than offering tax decreases and elimination of regulations. Once the taxes and regulations are in line with other countries then I could agree with Palin’s concerns. But not now.
I say Merry Christmas Carrier employees!!! It is money better spent then on illegals.
On the side: Do you think we’ll have to change the name Indiana to Native American-ana? Political correctness you know.
(or should we just throw all that crap out)!
Or games shows. Seriously, where was she throughout the campaign? Now this public rebuke of what Trump did with United Technologies/Carrier? Now she’ll garner many a “LIKE” by the anti-Trumpers, both left and right. Just IMHO.
The tax reduction and vast reduction of regulations are going to be for all business. When Trump takes office and can work those issues with Congress.
That is the long term ‘policy’ as expressed by President Elect Trump himself.
Oh please, grow up. Incentives to locate or remain in states have been consistently offered since the ‘60s. It’s good business sense and even the most basic thinker with two brain cells to rub together can figure ou. That incentive money is returned 10 times over by the taxes employees pay and by keeping jobs that all the suppliers of that business pay
Hmmmm $7 million in incentives and the company is going to invest $16 million in plant expansion? Who do you think is going to build that expansion? Are those construction workers going to pay taxes and support the local economy? What do you suppose the company is going to do with a bigger plant? Do you think they might hire more workers? Will those workers pay taxes and support the local economy?
Please! It’s a smart investment
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.