Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Law Professor: Trump Can't Hold Lease On His Hotel Near White House
NPR ^ | 29 Nov 2016 | Jackie Northam

Posted on 11/29/2016 1:50:29 PM PST by Theoria

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Vendome

Well, he’s actually effin wrong.

The exclusions are the President and V.P.

Besides, if he steps down from Trump Enterprises the point becomes moot.

How dare you bring up REAL FACTS in an Emotional Argument


41 posted on 11/29/2016 2:16:06 PM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

He’ll sign it over to one or all of his sons. Problem solved.


42 posted on 11/29/2016 2:17:07 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

I second that motion....that professor isn’t ready the entire paragraph....it has applicable exceptions that matter


43 posted on 11/29/2016 2:17:13 PM PST by smoky415 (Corporal Smoky - Smallest WWII Hero Dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

I am sure that they can’t cancel, but if they wish to pursue it, they can give back the $200 million in improvements. However Trump is sure to be able to demonstrate that the hotel will not break even until after he has left office. So he will not benefit from the space until after he has left office. This is ridiculous. Trump could also attack the contract on constitutional grounds.


44 posted on 11/29/2016 2:17:22 PM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

It Worked For LBJ! He Put his “holdings” in LadyBird’s name if memory serves and I believe it does....

ANd she Made a FORTUNE selling Military Equipment to the Chinese so they could ARM the North Vietnamese to continue killing our Soldiers.


45 posted on 11/29/2016 2:18:21 PM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

a phone, a pen and a twitter account. No problem!


46 posted on 11/29/2016 2:18:53 PM PST by rwoodward ("god, guns and more ammo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

NPR can wet their panties over a spurious issue such as Trump’s hotel, but never opened their pie holes when Bill Clinton was molesting an intern in the Oval Office. That’s why we hate Liberals.


47 posted on 11/29/2016 2:20:48 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Absolutely correct. My first post on this thread did not reference the section mentioned in the original post. The section mentioned in the original post is here:

http://www.gsa.gov/portal/mediaId/233123/fileName/Part_Two_of_Segment_001_of_OPO_Ground_Lease_(2013)_RA.action

Section 37.19, Interested Parties.

The lease is between the GSA and Trump Old Post Office LLC. Trump Old Post Office LLC is not a publicly held corporation or other (publicly held) entity. So, at first glance, section 37.19 would appear to mean that Trump (the person) cannot have any share of part of the lease or benefit that may arise therefrom once he becomes an elected official.

I don’t know how Trump (the person) is going to get around this, but one way might be to divest his shares of Trump Old Post Office LLC before he becomes an elected official. He’s certainly got plenty of time to do that.


48 posted on 11/29/2016 2:20:51 PM PST by Jubal Harshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

I saw the source of this article was NPR.

Well, Trump may be holding NPR’s the “lease” that enables it to operate. To wit, he needs to lead the effort to defund them. No more subsidies; make the rick liberals pay for the programming they want.


49 posted on 11/29/2016 2:21:05 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Two different entities, the actual entity lessee (Trump Organization) and Donald J. Trump the individual as POTUS elect! Geez, can’t the media do better than that! Business 101.


50 posted on 11/29/2016 2:21:16 PM PST by Ultramo (Trump the Establishment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
"In 2013, he signed a 60-year lease for the building with the General Services Administration"

Trump is 70. There must also be a clause to transfer his interest to his kids, his grandkids, or a purchaser.

51 posted on 11/29/2016 2:23:06 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Every nation has the government it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Trump does not personally own or in this case is a personal party to the lease. He owns shares in something that does.

But it’s such a big deal? Nope.


52 posted on 11/29/2016 2:24:08 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Say what you will about The Donald, but he has all the right enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Trump doesn’t hold the lease a corporation does

Plus judge napalitano says it’s not illegal. Pres and VP are exempt


53 posted on 11/29/2016 2:24:30 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

“Well, he’s actually effin wrong. The exclusions are the President and V.P.”

This is not the constitution. This is the words on the lease.

However, it is unclear that since he was elected after the lease was signed that he is totally obligated to end the lease.


54 posted on 11/29/2016 2:25:01 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RetiredNavy

” As long as the trump company signing the lease is a public corp, with DT a shareholder of that corp, the clause does not apply.”

BUT it is NOT a public corp.


55 posted on 11/29/2016 2:26:01 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Gee, I wonder who this lawyer voted for?


56 posted on 11/29/2016 2:26:42 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Isn’t that for purpose of contract award?


57 posted on 11/29/2016 2:28:59 PM PST by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

He could give it to Barron, just to piss them off.


58 posted on 11/29/2016 2:29:29 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mom4melody

This “law professor” is obviously a LIB idiot. It is hard to believe that people like him get paid to do anything, let alone abuse the students who have to be in his classroom.


59 posted on 11/29/2016 2:31:04 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Trump wasn’t an elected official—he stole the election, remember!!


60 posted on 11/29/2016 2:31:08 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson