Posted on 11/28/2016 3:55:15 PM PST by MNDude
Where did you find this image you posted in your defense of ACORN and Planned Parenthood?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3499269/posts?page=21#21
Another Freeper claimed it had been doctored from the original tweets.
So where did it come from?
Also, link the original tweets if you expect it to be considered accurate.
No, you don't get it.
YOU are the subject. You have been so crushingly wrong in the past, anything you write or say is automatically questionable.
As I wrote earlier, hitching your wagon to "Pizzagate" automatically discredited it.
I don't have to show where you are wrong. You just are. You always have been, and you always will be... wrong. If FR still showed postings from a decade ago, I could cite case after case where you were so completely clueless, I thought it was an act. Now, I can see that it's an inseparable part of you.
I don't know how you survive with such poor judgement. I presume you have someone supporting you, who is unwilling to make you responsible for yourself -- probably because you have failed so miserably on your own.
I hope they are getting professional help for you. I encourage you to print out the postings you have been making, so that you can discuss it with a mental health professional.
Sadly, you make no sense.
You attacks on me are pathetic, when they’re in defense of the following, at a minimum:
- The Clintons, and their foundation
- The Podesta brothers
- Planned Parenthood
- ACORN
- Possibly pedophilia and sex trafficking by all the above
Answer for why you have been claiming there is no reason for this investigation to go forward, and that Andrew Breitbart’s tweets attacking the above should be ignored.
LOL, do you really believe I care what you think?
You can search Breitbart's Twitter feed. Maybe you'll learn something.
Be careful with the date range you use, because the Washington Times article made a pretty glaring mistake:
A tweet by Mr. Breitbart shortly before his March 1, 2012, death is now being cited by online researchers as proof that they are onto something big.
The tweet in question was on February 4, 2011, almost 13 months before Breitbart's death.
It makes you wonder what else they got wrong, doesn't it?
A hint: practically everything.
I don't owe you an answer for anything.
If you want an investigation, call the FBI.
Thanks for your support. Clearly, his posts are hard to follow, but in a nutshell he’s trying to compare his defense of technology transfers to China and other governments, by way of an IBM lawsuit, that he supported and I opposed several years ago, to this current situation. Once again, he’s in the questionable position, and can only lash out with personal attacks since he has little if any high ground to stand upon. Expect more viciousness, before he eventually flames out, if we’re lucky..
Expected weasel talk, and finger pointing, while you continue to defend the indefensible. Go back to just lurking, or change your name to an honest one.
I told you exactly how to find the tweets in question, and even gave you a hint to avoid a lot of effort.
You see, if you were to accept the article's statement as true, you could expect to look at Breitbart's Twitter feed and expect to find the tweets in question shortly before his last tweet prior to his death.
You could scroll back through Breitbart's tweets for 13 months, but Andrew was a prolific tweeter. It would be much easier to use Twitter's advanced search.
Your inability to follow basic instructions is not my problem.
while you continue to defend the indefensible.
I'm not defending anyone, other than Breitbart himself -- who isn't alive to tell idiots like you what he was really tweeting about.
He's probably looking down at you right now, and saying:
"WTF, Dude? Are you that stupid?"
No that's on you, since another Freeper already claimed they were doctored. I'm not pinging him because it's not worth his time to deal with your belligerence, but I will link the post if you doubt it.
I'm not defending anyone
Ridiculous, you're clearly defending Podesta, and the Clintons by extension, when you claim Breitbart's tweets couldn't possibly have anything to do with #Pizzagate. But by your own admission, those tweets are tying both Planned Parenthood and ACORN to Podesta and child trafficking, which is the exact subject matter of #Pizzagate. And not only did you make such a foolish claim, you're still arguing now, and seem to have nothing but very personal attacks against me in your defense.
Miss Marmelstein, this is an object example of why I warned you about getting involved with these folks.
Compare what he wrote above to what we were actually talking about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO/Linux_controversies
Try to find anything resembling what he wrote above in the court cases described in that synopsis.
This is symptomatic of the people behind the whole Pizzagate "investigation": finding conspiracies that don't exist, and accusing anyone that questions it as "defending them".
Others have picked it up to click-farm unwitting readers. And as John Robinson has pointed out, it's also being used to undermine legitimate questions about the relationship of Clinton campaign staff with the media and the DoJ.
Specifically, you tried claim the tweets were only about Planned Parenthood and ACORN, when the facts clearly show he was tying both those organizations to child trafficking. How you claim they are disassociated is apparently only in your mind.
When confronted all you have in your defense is personal attacks against me, and your claim that IBM taking technology from a small American company and giving it to China and other countries to build supercomputers is somehow a point in your favor.
Nope, that's on him to prove they were doctored. He made the claim, let's see the proof.
I'm not pinging him because it's not worth his time to deal with your belligerence, but I will link the post if you doubt it.
In other words, you and/or he are afraid I will expose him as a liar.
You want to make the accusation -- back it up and show me where they were doctored. Otherwise, STFU.
Ridiculous, you're clearly defending Podesta, and the Clintons by extension, when you claim Breitbart's tweets couldn't possibly have anything to do with #Pizzagate.
I'm not defending anyone but Breitbart when I point out a fact: Andrew wasn't tweeting about "Pizzagate". I won't bother to go down that road again, because I know you are incapable of rational thought.
But by your own admission, those tweets are tying both Planned Parenthood and ACORN to Podesta and child trafficking, which is the exact subject matter of #Pizzagate.
"Pizzagate" is a lame conspiracy theory based on "coded emails" and "coded symbols".
The Planned Parenthood stings were an 18-year-old woman posing as a 15-year-old wanting an abortion, and PP saying they would doctor the records so they didn't have to report she was underage.
Podesta was only tied to it because he helped Brock start Media Matters, and Media Matters was helping Planned Parenthood deal with the fallout.
You posted an image that SUPPOSEDLY came from twitter, that another Freeper has claimed was doctored. Show us the actual tweets, from twitter, or admit the image you posted is unverified. Where did you get that image, by the way, one of the liberal sites defending the Clintons, as you clearly are?
I'm not defending anyone but Breitbart
Actually you attacked him, and the truth, when you attempted to claim his posts were nothing about child trafficking, when clearly they were. You attempted to claim they were only about Planned Parenthood and ACORN, insinuating it was an unrelated matter, when clearly he was tying both of them to child trafficking, which is the focus of #pizzagate.
The Planned Parenthood stings were an 18-year-old woman posing as a 15-year-old wanting an abortion, and PP saying they would doctor the records so they didn't have to report she was underage.
Completely false, of course. The issue was with regard to that person be involved in sex trafficking, as any basic review of the incident would clearly indicate.
Podesta was only tied to it because he helped Brock start Media Matters, and Media Matters was helping Planned Parenthood deal with the fallout.
Wrong again, of course. Podesta was defending them, which Breitbart responded to. And now we know that Brock was in a (gay) sexual relationship with the owner of Comet Pizza, one of (but far from the only) principles in the #Pizzagate investigation.
Then this "another Freeper" should be able to back up his claim.
Show us the actual tweets, from twitter, or admit the image you posted is unverified.
I don't have to show anything -- because I've already shown them. They are authentic, and you can easily verify them. I've told you exactly how to do it. I did so, because getting it directly from Twitter using a search shows Breitbart's entire set of tweets in context during that period.
The reason you haven't verified them: it would prove this "another Freeper" is a liar at worst or mistaken at best, and you can't handle the truth.
This is symptomatic of your real problem: your grasp on reality is so warped, that you can't handle anything that refutes it. And, you cling to the smallest thing to keep from confronting it.
And now, I've realized that I'm just feeding your pathology. You really need professional help, and if you are in out-patient treatment, I'm only making it worse.
Goodbye, and good luck.
So you choose to post bogus images in defense of the Clintons/Podestas, then go in hiding when questioned on it. You should just stay lurking, permanently, this time.
wasnt there a series of Drudge posts about gays celebrating the Obama inauguration, leaving behind disgusting destroyed hotels and rented facilities in DC? any connection?
I’m not aware of that specific information, but I do remember seeing pictures of the aftermath of the inauguration on the mall (outdoor DC area where people watched) and it was left absolutely filthy. Trash everywhere. (Amazing testament to the party that is always whining about the environment. In contrast, after the Tea Party march, the area was spotless.)
This is an interesting thread...
I’m not involved with anyone. Go away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.