Posted on 11/28/2016 3:55:15 PM PST by MNDude
No, but I have to be honest with you: the moment I saw you had signed on to it, it eliminated any possibility in my mind that it was legitimate.
Your personal involvement guarantees that it is all complete BS.
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. You have never been right, even once.
I noticed you have been gone from Free Republic for a while. Did they finally let you out from your last involuntary commitment?
Mojo has nailed it. This nothing but fake news to take advantage of the weak-minded.
Why would they do it? Money. Ever time you click on a link with another round of innuendo and character assassination, you put more money in their pocket.
You might be surprised to find that the co-founder of Free Republic agrees with me:
His opinion is as valid as yours. But you are ashamed of Free Republic which I doubt the owner is. And, so I repeat: if you’re so ashamed of this site, buzz off, and find a place more suited to your extreme good taste.
Look, I'll offer the same challenge I did before: If you think there is evidence of what you believe, make an appointment with the FBI and present it to them.
We can start a pool and place bets on whether you will actually be invited to do so, and if you do -- how long you will last before you are escorted to the door.
Of course, I'm being sarcastic: I really don't want you to waste the FBI's time. I don't think they would appreciate my suggestion.
Instead, I will make a very serious suggestion: gather all your evidence, and make an appointment with a mental health care professional. Explain your "investigation" to him/her, who will listen very intently.
Then, they will offer to do what is needed to help you. Be sure to put your affairs in order before your appointment, because your freedom may be restricted for awhile.
If you won't do it for yourself, do it for your family and friends that worry about you.
Bttt.
5.56mm
I think you misunderstood: I'm ashamed of what Free Republic has become.
Because I'm ashamed by the people like you that have infested Free Republic.
And, so I repeat: if you’re so ashamed of this site, buzz off, and find a place more suited to your extreme good taste.
Again, I'm ashamed of people like you, and how you are poisoning Free Republic and trying to chase off rational people that are capable of critical thinking.
So, when I see conspiracy nutjobs like you, I call them out. So, if you don't like being called out, stop acting like a conspiracy nutjob -- or at least stop falling for fake news.
Have a nice day.
So, let’s figure this out: I’ve misunderstood that you are ashamed of FR but only what it has become - which is sort of like saying: YOU ARE ASHAMED OF FR, lol! Obviously, logic is not your strong suit.
I see that while you’ve been here from 1998, you’ve never managed to mention what state you live in. Why is that? And why do so many people from 1998 refuse to state where they live? That’s a conspiracy theory on it’s own if I was interested in conspiracy theories, which I am not. Probably more like cowardice.
And I love how you’ve picked up on the NYTimes “fake news” memo. How Paul Krugman, how Nick Kristol of you.
If any of this worldwide pedophilia among politicians (currently being exposed in Great Britain) and show business figures comes to John Podesta’s door, I can well imagine you going silent as the night. I’ve been to that rodeo many times here - Penn State, anyone?
I almost hate to say this, but it’s too bad that Tucker and/or Andrew didn’t leave behind what Ayers left behind in the New York City Police Department headquarters in 1970, the United States Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972.
Ah, hell, I don’t hate to say it.
Interesting. Of all things that you could complain about, you complain about that. I guess I should be honored to have my own cyber stalker -- but you aren't very good, because it would only take a few minutes of looking at my postings to figure out what state I'm in.
The truth is: I don't advertise it, and I don't hide it. If you have a problem with that, so be it. I don't care.
And I love how you’ve picked up on the NYTimes “fake news” memo.
I've been warning people about fake news long before the NY Times "discovered" it.
Do you remember articles posted on FR from the "Denver Guardian", "Baltimore Gazette", "Christian Times Newspaper" or NationalReport.net?
All of them were bogus stories, specifically to "farm" clicks. The operator of the Denver Guardian seeded a bogus story on Free Republic and elsewhere, and gathered over 2 million clicks. He admitted to NPR of making on the order of 10's of thousands of dollars per month.
Unlike the NY Times, I don't see a "political" motivation to undermine a candidate. it's all about money.
And, that's what "pizzagate" is all about: preying on weak-minded people that will eagerly click on every article about it, because it fits your confirmation bias.
Not really. I see you're still a liberal, which is all that really matters.
I stalk you? You mean that by going on your home page, that is stalking? Are you a little girl? A pajama boy? Or just a cry-baby? How pathetic, lurking. We have home pages so that we can see our fellow freepers’ home state and read up on their viewpoints. Maybe, instead of being so ashamed of FR, you should actually learn how it works.
Keep telling yourself that. As I wrote earlier, you haven't been right even once.
Personal attacks, as usual, is all you ever have. Can’t wait to see you go into meltdown mode, again, and completely flip out when it’s proven you have no logic in your thoughts. We’re already there by the way.
Oh, good grief.
I was hoping that you would see what I'm trying to show you, but like the dog on "Up!", all you can focus on is "Squirrel!".
I can now see I've been wasting my time.
Good bye, and good riddance.
Keep your word, and go back to just lurking. We'll all be better off, including you.
All I have for you are personal attacks, along with the rest of the mush-minded idiots that think "Pizzagate" is real. Frankly, it's because it's all you understand, and deserve.
Can’t wait to see you go into meltdown mode, again, and completely flip out when it’s proven you have no logic in your thoughts.
You slunk away and disappeared when I made a mockery of your lame astroturfing a decade ago. I figured you were curled up in a fetal position in the corner, crying to your mother.
I would have thought you would have matured a bit since then. Apparently, you haven't.
Go away, or I will taunt you a second time.
Clearly you must mean my defense of a small, American company, that was being crushed by the international conglomerate IBM who was stealing their property under the liberal laws put in place by companies like Google. I have no shame in defending them, and apparently you still stand with international bullies like the Clinton Foundation, and are willing to do anything to defend them. Color me unimpressed, and still waiting for you to honor your name of just lurking.
Wow, you still have no clue. SCO crushed themselves, by literally imagining that someone HAD to have copied their code -- despite their own findings to the contrary. They hired an outside consultant to look for it during or before 2002, and after 4-6 months of work, he found absolutely nothing.
The consultant told them there was code in common, but it was code that SCO and the Linux Community had each legitimately acquired from a third party. A internal SCO email was unsealed by discovery in 2005 during the litigation, in which SCO executives admitted to this in 2002 -- before any lawsuit was filed.
Ironically, SCO Unix lives on at a new company that bought the rights at auction from a bankrupt SCO: Xinuos. The new company also markets an OS based on FreeBSD.
Like I wrote earlier: I can always count on you to be wrong about anything and everything. And, you are starting to sound like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, which makes it even more amusing.
I understand you’re totally desperate to change the subject, but this current matter has nothing to do with your past support of the breakdown of US intellectual property laws and gift of technology to foreign countries, that you supported years so. This time it has to do with your defense of the following, per your latest posts:
- The Clintons, and their foundation
- The Podesta brothers
- Planned Parenthood
- ACORN
- Possibly pedophilia and sex trafficking by all the above
No one needs to go any further than your recent posts for confirmation, where you claim all of the above are “out of context” despite none other than Andrew Breitbart tying all of them together shortly before his (mysterious) death.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.