Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Chaffetz: We're not done with Hillary Clinton
Fox News ^ | 11/16/2016 | Fox News

Posted on 11/16/2016 12:16:59 PM PST by johnk

Rep. Chaffetz: We're not done with Hillary Clinton


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; email; scandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: rightwingextremist1776

A pardon cannot be rescinded, but an investigation is still necessary to understand what happened and what must be done to ensure it never happens again. Her guilt can still be established, and her trust (what little is left) destroyed.

Of course, all this must happen before her clients withdraw a ton of flesh in return for failure to deliver influence nor refunds for their $billions.


21 posted on 11/16/2016 12:29:40 PM PST by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

It really MUST happen. Trump is the only one who could pull it off methinks.


22 posted on 11/16/2016 12:30:23 PM PST by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
Chaffetz Grills Comey: 'You've Set a Dangerous Precedent'
by Cortney O'Brien, townhall.com / Jul 07, 2016

Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) opened Thursday’s House Oversight Committee hearing on the FBI’s decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton by noting he has "great admiration" for the FBI. Yet, he and his colleagues are “mystified” by FBI Director James Comey’s laying out the damning fact pattern about Clinton’s use of a private email server, yet opting not to pursue criminal charges.

“The average Joe, if they had done what you laid out in your statement, they’d be in handcuffs,” Chaffetz said. "You've set a dangerous precedent."

It seems an awful lot like a double standard, the chairman noted.

Hillary Clinton laid out this mess, made a very conscious decision to set up a system to bypass the protocol of the State Department, Chaffetz continued. Her actions put American lives at jeopardy, yet there doesn’t seem to be any consequence waiting for her.

“I have defended your integrity, but I am mystified and confused,” Chaffetz said to Comey.

Comey began his opening statement by saying he was “proud” of the work the FBI did in its investigation and welcomed the panel’s questions. “I’m a big fan of transparency.”

There was no evidence to suggest Clinton was guilty of gross negligence, he explained.

“That’s just the way it is,” he said. "No reasonable prosecutor" would pursue criminal charges.

Prompted by Rep. Elijah Cummings’ (D-MD) line of questioning, Comey contrasted Clinton’s case with that of David Petraeus’s, who Comey said acted deliberately in his abuse of classified information. Unlike Clinton, Comey said Petraeus's act was a clear obstruction of justice that justified prosecution.

Chaffetz also asked Comey about Clinton’s private server in her basement in her New York home. Was it an unauthorized or an authorized location? he wondered.

It was an “unauthorized location for the transmitting of classified information,” Comey answered.

Would someone with Clinton’s record ever be given a security clearance from the FBI? Chaffetz later asked. Comey refused to directly answer, but noted it was certainly be a serious consideration.

“It would be an important consideration in a suitability determination.”

Comey also acknowledged that if someone in the FBI had done what Clinton did with her emails, they would face a range of discipline, such as termination or loss of clearance.

Panelist Rep. Trey Gowdy (S-SC) agreed with Chaffetz's assessment that the FBI had set a dangerous precedent in its investigation, fearing that the FBI's decision will do nothing to prevent future secretaries of state from using the same email scheme.

Update: Chaffetz let Comey know that he will be sending the FBI a congressional referral to investigate whether Clinton lied under oath.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/07/07/comey-hearing-n2189236

23 posted on 11/16/2016 12:31:08 PM PST by Liz (Experience is a dear teacher, but fools will learn at no other. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Go after the crooks in IRS, DOJ, DOE, EPA.

You forgot CIA, DOT, HUD, ABC, CBS, PMSNBC, CNN, TREASURY, HS, ETC. ETC. ETC.

24 posted on 11/16/2016 12:31:26 PM PST by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: johnk

Yep. This is not about getting even with hillary. It’s not really about hillary, per-se. It is about upholding the rule of law.


25 posted on 11/16/2016 12:31:54 PM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
Hmmm...the pardon itself would be an admission of guilt, not coming from HRC, but from Barry...the final nail in her political coffin, and the beginning of an era of Obama progressives in complete control of the party.

That's right. That's why Obama will NOT pardon Hillary. They see no need to do so. After all the dem position is that she has done no wrong.

26 posted on 11/16/2016 12:34:31 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vooch

or this deal:

she has to close the clinton foundation and give all its money to build the wall.


27 posted on 11/16/2016 12:36:39 PM PST by pioneerstakethearrows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

With Hillary not there to protect his legacy, what does he owe her?

Unless he’s afraid she’ll turn on him and kill his legacy even more.


28 posted on 11/16/2016 12:37:29 PM PST by Trumplican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Doesn’t she need to be convicted before she can be pardoned?


29 posted on 11/16/2016 12:38:18 PM PST by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: longfellow
Not if she aint charged before he leaves.

Not so. Nixon was pardoned for "any crimes he may have committed while president".

No charges, yet pardoned and thus shielded from prosecution.

Which is why it is important that she be hounded and taken down for her dealings with the Clinton Foundation...not what she may have done as SecState.

30 posted on 11/16/2016 12:39:30 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnk

We’ve heard for years how you guys in Congress were really gonna do something this time! Actions speak louder than words. So shut up until and show us the Justice!


31 posted on 11/16/2016 12:41:24 PM PST by uncitizen (NOT Suffering Fools Since 11/8/16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BRL

LOL. Keep em drunk so they don’t brother us too much.


32 posted on 11/16/2016 12:42:14 PM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: johnk

Plea bargain: never, never will a Clintonrun tor any office, including dog catcher . No Chelsea, no Chelsea kids, no Chelsea grandchildren, No husband of Chelsea


33 posted on 11/16/2016 12:42:34 PM PST by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

Was Nixon convicted? Answer no.


34 posted on 11/16/2016 12:43:39 PM PST by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: johnk

A genuinely independent prosecutor is the only way to go. Give him or her sufficient power to do a through job.


35 posted on 11/16/2016 12:43:50 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnk

take this crime family down and then work on the obama crime family.


36 posted on 11/16/2016 12:43:56 PM PST by sappy (criminaldems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnk

Hopefully, our homeland is now through with two garbage families: the Clintons and the Bushes.


37 posted on 11/16/2016 12:44:30 PM PST by Dagnabitt (Trump - Because countries without Islamic immigration are countries without Islamic terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnk

I was reading that the presidential pardon process is not something that can be rushed through in a matter of weeks, it actually can take months and months. There’s quite a few steps involved.

However, knowing the sham FBI “examination” of the 650,000 Weiner emails was “completed” in nine days, heck, anything is possible.

The reality: Obama’s “legacy” is in ruins. Will he want to cast further doubts/questions regarding his “legacy” by pardoning a failed and criminally corrupt presidential candidate? The same candidate now blaming him and the FBI Director for her humiliating defeat at the ballot box? If he does pardon Cankles, it will clearly show him to be a co-conspirator and enabler of a corrupt Secretary of State.

So what will Obama do or not do to preserve/rescue his pathetic “legacy”? Will he or will he not pardon Cankles? It’s an interesting question.


38 posted on 11/16/2016 12:45:41 PM PST by RooRoobird20 (Cradle Democrat Hispanic woman, left the party in 1993 because of the Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

You can bet the bank that 0bama will pardon her. He will probably pardon her whole crew, including B.J. Clinton and Chelsea.


39 posted on 11/16/2016 12:46:12 PM PST by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
I believe the manchild will pardon her as Ford pardoned Nixon

Somehow I doubt it. Pardoning Nixon killed Ford's political career, do you think Obie would do that? For HER?

OTOH, a GOP inquisition into her crimes could be spun into a vengeful witch hunt by the Dems and the MSM.

Much as I'd like to see her behind bars, I will settle for her broke, out of power, helplessly watching as her party, and her agenda, go down the tubes. I wish her a long and miserable life in obscurity.

40 posted on 11/16/2016 12:47:49 PM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson