Compared to that, Trump's crass braggadocios jesting means less than nothing. Accusing Trump of "sexual assault" while being married to BILL CLINTON is breathtaking.
Posted on 10/28/2016 6:25:16 AM PDT by shortstop
Damn that's some pretty good stuff
I am stealing it (with attrubution)
I shudder to think who may be there now.
We used to say beaver, box, bearded clam, hair pie, grass sandwich, etc. not kidding. My husband’s roommate college people a scrotum. I had never heard that word. Back in our college days. We all LAUGHED, it was funny. I think demoncraps are feigning disgust now. The p word, the n word, ppl should get over it. I hear Spanish words for testicles all the time. May not be genteel, but not earth shattering. Our world is way too p c. We found a new church in our new town which is proud of not being p c, or up tight.
All in a culture that made 50 Shades of Grey a bestseller, and Miley Cyrus a star. The Left has weaponized morality.
And 50 years ago we stood idly by as the Democrats, led by Ted Kennedy, engineered and implemented policies to allow them to import millions of Democratic voters from the third world.
It took a couple of generations but we've finally passed the tipping point.
You only need to play blog-pimping policeman when the OP only puts up a short snippet of a blog post, trying to lure clicks. This one is fine, since we don’t need to click on anything to read what the author has to say.
Otherwise, your routine is annoying, since I have rarely seen you contribute anything positive to FR, if at all.
Maybe you have contributed something other than “YOU ARE PIMPING BLOG ARGAJJAGJHGAGA”, it’s just that it’s so rare and/or so inconsequential that I don’t recall it.
Way to go.
Now you p’d off the fat bastid contingent.
I went to your link and actually read Zerohedge comments for the first time. I was quite impressed by the intelligent level of discourse and insight of the posters. A far cry from the angry, profane, juvenile rants and insult fests we’ve come to expect from comment boards on such sites.
I doubt it was even that. Trump is a natural showman who thrives on attention and adoration. The most likely explanation I can see, given Trump's irreproachable conduct when he actually met the attractive woman who greeted him, is that we heard a method actor warming up. Trump was getting in character to say the outrageous things that boost ratings, nothing more . . . and a member of the Bush Clan used that casual comment in an attempt to derail the election and reward the matriarch of the smaller but equally powerful Clinton Clan.
Compared to that, Trump's crass braggadocios jesting means less than nothing. Accusing Trump of "sexual assault" while being married to BILL CLINTON is breathtaking.
It’s known as Critical Theory.
http://www.smashculturalmarxism.com/critical-theory-is-cultural-marxism/
It is one of the tools being used by the Cultural Marxists to erode the foundations of Western civilization, in particular the American interpretation of it.
All other countries have “sinned” as much or even worse than the U.S., but their misdeeds are not proclaimed as loudly. That’s because the Cultural Marxists have already achieved much of their “long march through the institutions” there. Here, they are encountering resistance that they must double their efforts on.
By the way, one of the other tools they are using is Polymorphous Perversity.
This is what you’re seeing with the “non-binary gender” and various paraphilia movements.
Wrong analysis. The nation wasn't going to be toppled because of a "P-word" it was going to be toppled because the forces of the left wing have an absolute lock on the information streams America uses to make their decisions.
The Liberal Democrat media headquartered in New York (which voted for Obama at 89%) decides what the public is going to hear, and they work at steering the public regarding what the public is going to think about the "news" they present.
If you spend a week hammering the "P-word" and telling the public it is absolutely dreadful and disqualifying, then much of the public will eventually think that must be true.
The "P-word" is just a temporary tool. In other elections they used an "M-word". (Macaca.) When Palin was on the ticket they used an "S-word". (Stupid. "I can see Russia from my house.") When Dan Quayle was vice president, they used a different "P-word". (Potato)
No, the problem is not specific words or specific events, it's the fact that all news is filtered through and scheduled by, Liberal Democrats Headquartered in New York city.
This condition of "information control" has warped and manipulated many elections, (1992, 2008, 2012) and in my opinion this condition constitutes the gravest threat this nation currently faces.
Let us not focus on individual words or individual events and recognize that the damage caused is the consequence of Liberal Control of the "News" system.
I don’t think I mentioned pimping blogs at all, could you show me where on this thread that I did?
Additionally, if and when I need you to tell me when and what I need to do, I’ll let you know.
Have a cheerful and productive day.
LOL!
Sorry, I just get tired of people’s sh!t sometimes. Gotta call it like I see it.
Selective morality is an option when you control the "news" system.
And a good chunk of Hillary’s votes will be only because she has a p-word.
Hell, I’m old and angry myself lol.
That’s all correct.
And in this regard, the alliance with islam begins to make sense and I’m sure some on the left have figured out that it is the religio/politico system that works best for them to keep the masses in place. It’s very easy to “convert” to, and the five pillars are kept pretty easily by the elite....who can continue to be part of the elite and rub shoulders with the islamic elite (lilke the Saudi royal family) and enjoy the lifestiles of the elites, ruling over the slave cast who must now submit. Just so long as they keep the clerics in line, they are good. And plenty of same sex harams for the perverted. So for the elites, life under (above) islam is just dandy.
I don’t think I mentioned pimping blogs at all, could you show me where on this thread that I did?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You called out the OP as being the guy who owned the blog to which he was linking. Do you need me to link your post or can you scroll up? Or do you not know the definition of the word “implication” or “implicit”? Here, let me help with that, not-so-humble gunner, aka Enjoyment Vampire:
implicit:
1. implied though not plainly expressed. “comments seen as implicit criticism of the policies”
implication
1. the conclusion that can be drawn from something, although it is not explicitly stated.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Additionally, if and when I need you to tell me when and what I need to do, I’ll let you know.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nope, I’ll tell you what to do, parasite.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Have a cheerful and productive day.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Are you still posting here? If so, it ain’t happening. Do the world a favor and get permanently lost, Mr. Killjoy McPostPolice.
And the media focused on that above all else
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.