Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll finds shrinking lead for Clinton in New Hampshire ("within margin of error")
www.cnn.com ^ | 26 Nov 2016

Posted on 10/26/2016 12:15:34 PM PDT by 11th_VA

Washington (CNN) — Hillary Clinton's edge over Donald Trump is dwindling in New Hampshire, a new Monmouth University poll shows.

Clinton leads the GOP nominee by 4 percentage points, within the poll's 4.9-point margin of error and an apparent decrease from the 9-point edge she enjoyed in Monmouth's September survey.

Washington (CNN) — Hillary Clinton's edge over Donald Trump is dwindling in New Hampshire, a new Monmouth University poll shows.

Clinton leads the GOP nominee by 4 percentage points, within the poll's 4.9-point margin of error and an apparent decrease from the 9-point edge she enjoyed in Monmouth's September survey.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2016polls; 2016swingstates; nh2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: 11th_VA

If it’s from lying Monmouth Trump is ahead in NH.


21 posted on 10/26/2016 12:23:49 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Take it..I know we’re not focused on NH, but I want it anyway. I want as many states as possible to repudiate this madness.


22 posted on 10/26/2016 12:24:20 PM PDT by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

SSSHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The key to the election now is to motivate our side, and convince the other side it is in the bag and they don’t need to show up!


23 posted on 10/26/2016 12:24:37 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie ("BECAUSE YOU'D BE IN JAIL")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

Going to be like Reagan in 1980 BUT VOTE and Work Hard


24 posted on 10/26/2016 12:24:40 PM PDT by scooby321 (o even lower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

COME ON, New Hampshire! Vote for Mr Trump!

Live Free, or Die!


25 posted on 10/26/2016 12:25:07 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
But they also very much want, and need to be, correct - in the long run

In the past maybe. This year the bias is off the charts. It may simply be that no amount of skewing can hide a Trump surge. That said, I'm still burned by 2012 and 2008 thinking that the GOP was secretly leading.

26 posted on 10/26/2016 12:27:11 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Maybe. But this could be bait to draw Trump to NH for those 4 electoral votes and away from bigger fish.

LOL. Yeah right. Trump will just go running there without any internal polling confirming the results of this one poll.

Look where the candidates are campaigning and that will tell you what they consider to be the most important and critical. Trump has been practically living in FL and NC.

Trump is scheduled today for two visits to NC. Tomorrow it is three stops in Ohio. Friday it is NH and MA.

Trump and Pence schedules.

27 posted on 10/26/2016 12:29:37 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Publius

As the days dwindle, so must the ‘special sauce’ Hillary leads concocted by abetting pollsters. That is unless they don’t want to keep doing business by maintaining these ridiculous “Hillary is winning” assertions.

Regardless, I believe he will win and it will be a landslide of 1980 proportions.


28 posted on 10/26/2016 12:29:46 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

NH is the state I had giving Trump 272! This election is going to be called real early.


29 posted on 10/26/2016 12:31:03 PM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Concur.


30 posted on 10/26/2016 12:32:29 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Never doubted this... The media cartel completely in the bag for Hillary since the Friday before the 2nd debate has likely made this election closer than it probably would have been otherwise, but Trump will still get a solid win.


31 posted on 10/26/2016 12:33:27 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
The polls must now deal with the reality on the ground so as not to loss all credibility.

Indeed. Watch for the "sudden surge of swing-voters" excuse.

32 posted on 10/26/2016 12:37:38 PM PDT by Oatka (Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Maybe not on the scale of 1980, but I think many late deciding voters go to Trump for a comfortable victory.


33 posted on 10/26/2016 12:38:12 PM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

While I’d love to see a landslide, Trump just winning 270 with taking New Hampshire is fine by me. I remember the outrage of when Bush won in 2000 with the help of New Hampshire. The Democrats were outraged as if they’ve been cheated on...to lose their “safe” blue state.


34 posted on 10/26/2016 12:40:18 PM PDT by zr2hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
I believe there are three factors that have led to polls understating Trump support across the board.

First, the desire to poll "likely voters" means that the polling companies use Registered voter lists, and ask for a specific voter when calling. Then they ask how likely that person is to actually vote. This results in dated information being used to determine the sample. Many new registrations have happened in the last few months, many of them who had been disenchanted with the political process, but see Trump as a force to change that.

Second, in order to turn around a poll quickly, the sample is not truly random; the pollster creates a party affiliation model based on estimated turnout. This could be accurate, it could be manipulated, or it could be that the guess is simply wrong, without any willful intent. No one really knows for sure what the turnout will be, so the pollsters use historical data for guidance. But as we know, past performance is not indicative of future results.

And third, there is the idea that people are not candid with the pollster for a number of reasons. This is the hardest one to confirm or quantify, but with social media and the media so belligerent toward Trump, it may be a factor, even a small one.

Taken together, these factors could cause the Trump support to be underestimated.

As the Voting lists get updated, the models revised, and the voter becoming more forthcoming, we could see the results tighten.

But whether they tighten or not, I think all of Trump's support is understated, and expect the votes on election day to be quite a surprise to the "conventional wisdom".

35 posted on 10/26/2016 12:40:48 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

They polled 23% D, 25% R, 51%I

Here is NH voter registration as of October 1, 2016:

D 271353—29%
R 295697—32%
I 351316—38%

So their sample is skewed towards Independents with a one point skew towards Democrats.

Why are they oversampling Independents by so much?

Couldn’t they keep calling until they got the right mix?

There is still too much opportunity for mischief.


36 posted on 10/26/2016 12:41:44 PM PDT by cgbg (This space for rent--$250K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
NH, PA and CO are the three states the Trump campaign has identified to go after hard. The campaign says it only needs one of those states to put it over 270 assuming it holds its lead current in the other states.



Yes. The base states Trump takes and holds then add NH.


37 posted on 10/26/2016 12:43:38 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Trump was planning to be in NH anyway. He’s in Manchester on Friday.


38 posted on 10/26/2016 12:43:48 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
Wow, and from Monmouth too, the pollster that even Nate Silver says produces the most favorable-to-Clinton polling numbers.


39 posted on 10/26/2016 12:45:08 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida
NH is the state I had giving Trump 272! This election is going to be called real early.

I agree. If Trump wins NH, and we'll know early in the evening, the election is over.

40 posted on 10/26/2016 12:47:58 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson