But here's the best part:
Gun activists march close to The University of Texas campus on Dec. 12, 2015 in Austin, Texas.
Posted on 10/26/2016 6:49:18 AM PDT by facedown
But here's the best part:
Gun activists march close to The University of Texas campus on Dec. 12, 2015 in Austin, Texas.
Yeah...It’s much safer to throw a book or pencil at a mass murderer....
A study created and designed to reach that conclusion, no doubt.
The individual carrying the gun is safer.
This is thinly disguised agitprop paid for by Bloomberg. It is not a “study”.
Note the stupid assumption in the results.
It says guns on campus do not make campus safer.
That is not the criteria the U.S. uses to make decisions about personal liberty.
That assumes that everything that is not allowed is forbidden.
In the United States, the assumption is everything that is not forbidden is allowed.
It is up to the proponents of gun bans to prove that gun bans are Constitutional *and* significantly improve safety.
They cannot do so because gun bans do not do so.
More NBC BS.
That's true. That's why police don't carry guns.
JHU is in Bawlmer, Peoples’ Republic of Maryland. Questions?
Sure....when confronted by a mass shooter on campus, be sure to throw your book at them. Then immediately claim the area you’re in as a safe space. That will stop them every time.
The fact is that people with CC permits are extremely unlikely to commit a crime and may eve deter crime, so what could it hurt?
What is with the magazine on that rifle?
A study from nbc??? LOL! Oh man, that’s funny. Tell us another one.
....because an open carry sex toy will do the job instead. /s
John Hopkins, huh?
Wonder what his handle on Huff Post, Daily Kos and DUmmies is?
In other words, a bullshit study.
You know, at the end of the day, the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is not to necessarily make CAMPUSES safer. So-called “campus carry” is so that my daughter and wife can protect THEMSELVES as individual citizens while going to school.
If their carrying makes others safer, that’s an additional benefit. If their carrying doesn’t make other individuals safer, it is irrelevant.
“What is with the magazine on that rifle?”
It looks like it’s in backwards.
That gun would not be as scary (and therefore much less dangerous) if the owner would just slap a coat of a soothing color of paint on it. A pale green or chartreuse, maybe?
I remember a cartoon of a polish pistol something like that.
There is no study that can accurately be done right now because there is no comparative data yet. So of course it is BS and it had to be conceived and designed to support the predetermined result that they came out with.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
