Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Nevertrumpers are going to be so disappointed around 9-10pm the evening of November 8th.

The candidate... telling a roaring crowd Thursday in Ohio that he would accept the results “if I win” — and reserving his right to legally challenge the results should he fall short.

The RATS may have something to say about Donald's challenge should it come to that. See here.

1 posted on 10/20/2016 8:51:20 PM PDT by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: upchuck

Newspaper industry is dying... ‘cause they fought for ‘prizes’ rather than the respect of their readers’... That said, considering how much the Washington Post hates conservatives we’re all charmed by their great ‘concern’...


62 posted on 10/20/2016 9:41:15 PM PDT by GOPJ ( "An honest public servant can't become rich in politics" - - President Harry S. Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Washington Post, of course.


65 posted on 10/20/2016 10:01:20 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

I worry about the polls and the soundness of the American voters after electing Obama twice, but if the reason people aren’t voting for Trump is because he says the system is rigged and he’s going to wait and see how election goes, that is simply stupid on the part of some and malevolent on the part of the hysteria mongers. Why should one say in advance one would accept results regardless of what level of fraud that actually occurs? And Democrats like Gore didn’t accept the 2000 results. People are dumb.


75 posted on 10/20/2016 10:27:12 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Translation: We at the Compost are bracing for a Trump victory and can’t even claim it was rigged!


79 posted on 10/20/2016 11:30:58 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

How do they even write this drek?

Pure fiction, especially the parts where the “reporter “ can read the minds of the collective GOP.

Gee, why would Trump be a little reluctant to throw his right to challenge suspicious election results away two days after O’Keefe’s videos drop?


81 posted on 10/20/2016 11:50:00 PM PDT by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

I just took a huge Rodham.


90 posted on 10/21/2016 2:03:44 AM PDT by YourAdHere (Hillary will win. I don't like it. I've just accepted it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

I don’t know why this is such a big deal. Has anyone asked Hillary this? Who cares if she doesn’t accept the results? Why does either candidate have to?


93 posted on 10/21/2016 2:48:22 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

Hugh Hewitt is a PUNK...an Elite PUNK!! His show is BORING....BRING BACK BILL BENNETT!!!


94 posted on 10/21/2016 3:27:57 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

The opposition will go down fighting to the last minute trying to dissuade people for voting for Trump because it would be futile - that he is going to lose for sure.

Horseshit.

We will win, and I suspect “bigly.” :0)


98 posted on 10/21/2016 5:00:46 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck; Sarah Barracuda; definitelynotaliberal; miss marmelstein; onyx; 2ndDivisionVet
Steve Schmidt?! Really?

That Palin hating Putz can go get bent.

This isn't over, not by a long shot.

Compare Trump to Ubama in 2008 if you will and I think you will see some parallels.

99 posted on 10/21/2016 5:26:00 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Control the Media, Control the Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

My husband says that if people like Paul Ryan and the rest of them had strongly endorsed Trump he’d be way ahead in the polls and headed for a strong win. My husband kind of despises both parties and has done so for at least 25 years although he’s supporting Trump. Is his criticism valid?

I loathe Steve Schmidt. A total loser, blowhard who is never right.


103 posted on 10/21/2016 5:54:42 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

BIG NEWS:

The same #NeverTrumpers are still nevertrumpers and the first republican mentioned, Steve Schmidt, is a commentator on msnbc. Nuff said.


106 posted on 10/21/2016 7:41:22 AM PDT by Pollard (TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

If those girlie-men in Gutless Other Party are worried they ought to be a man is coming and their cozy little party is in for a huge upset.


113 posted on 10/21/2016 10:32:20 AM PDT by JayAr36 (We now have a party called the Repuglicans. Disgusting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck
I am so anguished. I wouldn't concede a bucket of piss to the dims.
114 posted on 10/21/2016 7:51:18 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson