Posted on 10/20/2016 7:17:40 AM PDT by andrewschneider
Donald Trump entered last night’s final debate leading a campaign branded by bigotry and thuggery. That’s how Democrats have attempted to tarnish Trump and his supporters throughout the campaign cycle with a big assist from unethical media who plays along deceptively to keep their Democrat friends in power — at any cost.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat.
I want Trump to win. But if he can’t tamp down the opposition party, how in the heck is he going to maintain control with other country leaders?
The media and entertainment industry in this country doesn’t reflect this citizenry in any way at all. It’s pure fantasy 24/7.
By the same token if Hillary is concerned about Trump looming large over her, how is she going to survive the mind games with Putin?
I have to say I was somewhat impressed by Chris Wallace. I do not like the guy, but he was clearly the most fair-minded of all the moderators this year.
The enemy within.
When liberal media bias becomes nothing but organization propaganda, at what point can there be a legal remedy? To me it seems recent emails from government power brokers directing media information qualify as evidence of criminal conspiracy.
Agreed
So we in reality have two whiney wimps?
“The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat.”
Absolutely!
It’s not unethical for the media to please the only people they get their money from.
It’s just good business.
Their advertisers are heavy donors to Hillary and the media would be foolish to not support that investment.
“He who pays the piper...”
she’ll mouths nasty comments under her breath as it seems she’s done twice in debates to donald - that apparently satisfies her evil soul
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYOMkmbn0ek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shfB-HJhpss
If or when a revolution starts, that will not be forgotten.
I’m waiting for the Wikileaks drop that shows they (someone in the MSM) knew about the paid agitators. Could you if imagine chuck todd was knowledgable of such acts beforehand?
???????????
Go back to reply 6 and you’ll see the context.
I would agree with you if they didn’t claim “objectivity” in their reporting. At least Rush and others like him tell you their political bent at the start. Once an entity hides the truth or, worse yet, outright lies, they are propagandists and need to be called out.
I think it’s like used car salesmen: only a fool can think they’re ‘objective’, no matter how much they claim to be.
It is true media don’t disclose their interest.
But it’s there for anyone to see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.