Send this to all women with kids??
Are they just making-up words now?
This is entirely the wrong perspective. We should assign kids to gym class based on their sex (their chromosomes - for liberals who are in doubt this is the phenotype as indicated by external genitalia), regardless of "gender" (what they think they are regardless of reality). Then we can argue that locker rooms and restroom use has nothing to do with "gender" and we are not rejecting their self image, just dividing based on a characteristic unrelated to their identity.
That way, those of the male gender born with a penis, and those who think they are of the female gender but were born with a penis, and those of the feline/canine species who were born with 23 chromosome pairs and a penis would all be in the gym class for the male sex. Their classmates of whatever "gender", regardless of what gender or species they think they are, would be in the class for the female sex. This isn't about identity, and the class should not argue or discuss identity; it's just about the sex chromosomes and external body configuration.
From Cisalpine Gaul.
“sex assigned at birth”
Anyone who says that is out of contact with reality.
And everybody is just fine with it, it seems, being as how no one has expressed their opinion to the judge in a way she would understand.
Maybe we need to split this country in two. One side for Conservatives, one side for Liberals. Neither side interacts with the other. See the difference between the two in 20 years.
Isn’t insanity grounds for impeachment?
Likewise, male students need to “get over their discomfort” at seeing naked female bodies in the school showers and locker rooms. Oh, wait...
so, the judge is declaring that women (and girls) have no right to privacy.
“Cisgender”
Could an appeal be made on the basis of fabricating a gender name?
Patriots are reminded that the only sex-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect deals with voting rights as evidenced by the 19th Amendment, that amendment giving the feds the specific power to address sex-related issues only in the context of voting rights.
So not only is the misguided federal judge interfering in state sovereignty, but all that we’re predictably going to hear from the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Congress’s direction concerning this judge’s unconstitutional harassment of a sovereign state is crickets.
Remember in November !
Patriots need to support Trump / Pence by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trump’s vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also put a stop to unconstitutonal federal taxes and likewise unconstitutional inteference in state affairs.
Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
Overruled.
With prejudice.
Now I know why people in Trans-Alpine Gaul dressed differently than folks in Cis-Alpine Gaul.
These are the kinds of nonsense rulings that rebellions are predicated on.
“Can someone with a Y chromosome and male genitals be a “girl” in the eyes of the law? “
That is not a difficult question.
Unless you don’t believe in science (biology).
5.56mm
Synonym for "cisgender" = NORMAL
SO basically the ‘Judge” is ORDERING these Students to COMMIT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY..
Why is not this Judge in PRISON ALREADY, Preferably a Mens Prison with Him dressed as a Female.
You’d think people with advanced degrees with training in argument would be bright. It seems like those with law degrees are especially receptive to muddled thinking. They embrace nonsense topics and revel in deploying the latest buzzwords.
“whose sex assigned at birth”
I saw that same phrase in another article yesterday. So now your sex is “assigned” to you, it’s not something you are born with, according to the left. Control the language, you control the debate.