Posted on 10/19/2016 1:18:39 PM PDT by Hojczyk
“High school students do not have a constitutional right not to share restrooms or locker rooms with transgender students whose sex assigned at birth is different than theirs,” Gilbert wrote.
“A transgender person’s gender identity is an important factor to be considered in determining whether his or her needs, as well as those of cisgender people, can be accommodated in the course of allocating or regulating the use of restrooms and locker rooms,” he continued. “So, to frame the constitutional question in the sense of sex assigned at birth while ignoring gender identity frames it too narrowly.”
Yes, you read that correctly. “Cisgender” isn’t even a word, but it’s now in a federal court ruling. It’s a derogatory reference cooked up by the SJW to further separate people into pigeonholes and reinforce the idea that your biological makeup and DNA have no bearing on gender. This type of loaded language has no place in the courts, particularly since the Supremes have yet to weigh in on the subject.
It’s all part of a growing trend in the media, however. You may recall when a Charlotte newspaper declared that school age girls need to overcome their discomfort over seeing male genitals. The fact that many parents are rightly horrified by this is completely disregarded in SJW circles, but we are sadly seeing some judges taking these attitudes to heart.
It might be nice to hear the candidates take a firm position on this question before the election, particularly since one of them will be appointing Supreme Court Justices soon. Can someone with a Y chromosome and male genitals be a “girl” in the eyes of the law? And do school age girls need to “get over their discomfort” at seeing a penis in the school showers and locker rooms?
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Exactly, sex is assigned at conception. Liberals don’t make good scientists.
These are the kinds of nonsense rulings that rebellions are predicated on.
I would certainly do so. That indicates some kind of mental defect on the part of the judge.
“Can someone with a Y chromosome and male genitals be a “girl” in the eyes of the law? “
That is not a difficult question.
Unless you don’t believe in science (biology).
5.56mm
Synonym for "cisgender" = NORMAL
Vercingetorix was Trans.
SO basically the ‘Judge” is ORDERING these Students to COMMIT CHILD PORNOGRAPHY..
Why is not this Judge in PRISON ALREADY, Preferably a Mens Prison with Him dressed as a Female.
Climate.
The name made him tough. Kind of like a boy named Sue.
Perfect!
“Are they just making-up words now”
EPA is calling plowed farm fields “mini mountain ranges”
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3482124/posts
LOL, good one!
What were his parents thinking? How do you even SAY that?
(To be historical ... I’m sure he had long hair. I used to go to the All-Nations Pow-Wow back in Oklahoma. As a healthy adult woman, I can say that plenty of Real Men have long hair.)
“Oh Pancho!”
“Oh Cisgender!”
You’d think people with advanced degrees with training in argument would be bright. It seems like those with law degrees are especially receptive to muddled thinking. They embrace nonsense topics and revel in deploying the latest buzzwords.
“whose sex assigned at birth”
I saw that same phrase in another article yesterday. So now your sex is “assigned” to you, it’s not something you are born with, according to the left. Control the language, you control the debate.
It's obvious that you need to be sent to re-education camp so that you can be made to understand how Constitutional penumbras emanate. (That'll most likely be the Justice William O. Douglas Camp for Creative Emanating.)
You see, the penumbras emanate strong privacy for those wishing to further the cause of "weeding the Human garden" (Margaret Sanger.) If you want to kill inconvenient babies then those penumbras are gonna emanate all over you, covering you with all kinds of privacy under which you can do any dirty deeds you might want.
But the Constitutional penumbras have this dimmer switch.
If your goal is to shelter your Judeo-Christian morality from a decadent society, then the dimmer gets turned way down on your privacy, presumably to make up for all the bright shining it did on the decadent folk. (This is part of "Green Energy" and sustainable emanation.)
In fact now you're not only not entitled to privacy, but you are required to intimately participate in and celebrate the wonder of the folk who have transcended biology.
(If you are unsure how to properly celebrate, you can reference the Guccione film "Caligula.")
Meant to include you on the ping to #36.
This bathroom ruling only benefits men.
I would certainly do so. That indicates some kind of mental defect on the part of the judge.
‘Send this to all women with kids??’
I think we should send these moms Louisville Sluggers and dig up the home addresses of these half-wit school employers that had anything to do with this policy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.