Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right Now, There Are Only Two Kinds of Conservatives
Townhall.com ^ | October 12, 2016 | Mark Davis

Posted on 10/12/2016 6:21:16 AM PDT by Kaslin

The subdivisions of conservatism contain many corridors for channeling a love of liberty, smaller government and rule of law. Fiscal, social, constitutional, national security and immigration passions provide a useful scorecard for assessing the breadth of those seeking to be called conservative.

That discussion is for another day. From right now until the polls close November 8, there are only two kinds of conservatives: those willing to join the fight to protect America from a Hillary Clinton presidency, and those who, for whatever tortured reason they have fashioned, are unwilling.

The posturings of establishment squishes and NeverTrumpers now threaten to derail the task that should unite every conservative from this moment on. The nation must be protected from the ruin of another Clinton presidency, which, more to the point, is another Obama presidency. The contortions of many otherwise smart people have become a spectacle that threatens our nation, our future, our children. Silence is complicity.

The challenge to unity and clarity, of course, stems from the nominee the voters have chosen as Republican standard-bearer. Donald Trump freaks a lot of people out. So much so, that many steadfast conservatives spent some time in a fog, hatching narratives that he might in fact be as bad, if not worse, than she is.

Most have emerged from that haze, realizing that the prospects of a Hillary nightmare are far more real than the sloppy screenplays they had cobbled together in their heads.

The concoctions have been something to behold: He is an authoritarian who will sidestep Congress; he is a Trojan horse bent on sneaking concealed liberal agendas into the Oval Office; and, of course, he is an execrable racist.

Such slander from the left is to be expected. But to see these gems extracted from various orifices on the right is to witness the level of discomfort real change can generate. I took some time before leveling the charge that these people genuinely prefer a Hillary presidency. But how many Jonah Goldberg columns, Jennifer Rubin blogs and Bill Kristol tweets do I need to slog through before taking them at their word? They are willing to subject America to Hillary. For some unfathomable reason, the Obama agenda items they have spent years decrying have suddenly become acceptable, and all because the Republican nominee has put their drawers in such a knot.

There is plenty of fair criticism of Trump on the right. Some of his conservatism seems recently cultivated, and he has only fitful fluency in its language. Doubt is not unreasonable. And some of his pronouncements, from trade policies to the minimum wage, are soundly unconservative.

But his priority list offers a shot at conservative results more satisfying than we might have seen from perhaps half the field he defeated. Immigration, Obamacare repeal, a serious war against global jihad, a Reaganesque tax plan, job creation—if he bats only .500 on these, we will see a far better America than under her malicious stewardship.

And that’s before we get to the issue that will give the next president an imprint on America lasting until the grandchildren are grown: the Supreme Court. It is an unpardonable disconnect for any constitutional conservative to show nonchalance or outright approval as Hillary Clinton plots a savaging of the Bill of Rights.

So Trump is coarse. So he has said some offensive things. So he won’t mix well at George Will’s patrician cocktail parties. So he causes the elites to clutch their pearls and get the vapors. So what? We have a country to save.

And there are two kinds of conservatives right now: those who will take up the fight to save this nation from Hillary Clinton, and those who won’t. From the halls of Congress to the cubicles of punditry, many will be judged for years to come by their choices in the coming days.

And let’s be clear. Taking up the fight means taking up the fight. It does not include mere restraint from savaging the nominee. It does not mean playing Paul Ryan head games containing tepid good wishes wrapped in a refusal to endorse.

Taking up the fight means making it abundantly clear to all who listen that every voter should pull the lever for Donald Trump. Anything less leaves America’s door unlocked for the home invasion that will accompany the Hillary Clinton inauguration.

This call comes at a time of particular challenge, amid those stupid Billy Bush bus tapes from eleven years ago. John McCain, whom I eternally revere for his service to our nation, seems unable to navigate a path to clarity for fear that he cannot save the nation without wounding the women in his life.

I hold my wife and daughter in no lesser regard. The difference between Senator McCain and me is that I will be spending every day acting and speaking to protect my wife and daughter from the scourge of a Hillary presidency. I will be joined by countless conservatives who have pivoted from other candidates (I was a Cruz guy), sharing a common mission: to make sure that Bill and Hillary Clinton slink off to Chappaqua where they can never screw up our country again.

That’s one of the two current behaviors of conservatism. The other type will be weaving additional venomous tales of a Trump presidency that they say will be worse. Or maybe they don’t even believe that. Maybe they just hate him so deeply that it will be a notch on their belt to say they stood between him and the Oval Office.

I did not know sufficient engines of hysteria and self-absorption existed to devour the reasoning of so many people I had spent so many years respecting. If they wind up chilled by the sight of President Hillary Clinton attacking the foundations of their beliefs and their nation, I wonder if they will be sufficiently warmed by the embers of their torched reputations.

If that dark day of the third Obama term dawns, those of us who gave the last full measure to prevent it will have the satisfaction of having done the right thing. I do not wish this, but there will be poetic justice as some of the smart kids look around and wish they had focused on our nation and not their Trumpophobic fantasies.

So here’s a crazy idea: Let’s prevent that. After months of condescending cajoling, it is time for some tough love. It is time to give one last chance to the laggards to wake up and join the only ranks of conservatism that can save America from the concept that once united us: the horrors of a Hillary presidency.

Donald Trump did not divide us. He has not created a crisis that threatens the party, or more ludicrously suggested, conservatism itself. He just won the nomination, fair and square, because voters wanted him. The ones focused on rescuing the nation still do.

So it is a time for every conservative to look in the mirror and ask: Where will I stand? Whom will I vote for? What will I permit to happen? Will I allow conservative goals to be savaged by a Hillary presidency because Donald Trump gives me the willies? Or will I wake up, grow up and join the fight?

Because there are only two kinds of conservatives now. Those who will rise up to save us from her, and those willing to see us fall.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: donaldtrump; hillaryrottenclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Kaslin

“We have a country to save.”

Not much else matters in the long run...


21 posted on 10/12/2016 7:04:58 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“And that’s before we get to the issue that will give the next president an imprint on America lasting until the grandchildren are grown: the Supreme Court.

It is an unpardonable disconnect for any constitutional conservative to show nonchalance or outright approval as Hillary Clinton plots a savaging of the Bill of Rights.”

*BUMPITY-BUMP-BUMP-BUMP*


22 posted on 10/12/2016 7:06:50 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

Now, we have three parties.

The republicans, the ‘rats and the Trump Party.


23 posted on 10/12/2016 7:07:27 AM PDT by Daffynition (*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I like it! Although in my view the republicans and the rats are one party.


24 posted on 10/12/2016 7:47:38 AM PDT by uncitizen (JFK: The first victim of the New World Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I know it won't do any good, except for personal satisfaction, but yesterday I received one of those postage pre-paid "Rush" envelopes from the GOP to send them money. In bright red letters I wrote "NOT ONE RED CENT WHILE PAUL RYAN REMAINS SPEAKER!"

I continue to contribute to the Trump campaign directly, and to the FR and NRA.

25 posted on 10/12/2016 7:48:36 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Honest Abe MADE Her Lie, so now She is a pathological LIAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Those that do not support can be further divided into two groups, those that are ignorant and those that are complicit.


26 posted on 10/12/2016 7:49:35 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
And there are two kinds of conservatives right now: those who will take up the fight to save this nation from Hillary Clinton, and those who won’t. From the halls of Congress to the cubicles of punditry, many will be judged for years to come by their choices in the coming days.

Money line - we must ask ourselves which we are and those who fall into Hillary's camp need to be ostracized.

27 posted on 10/12/2016 7:50:31 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

When even a squish like Mark Davis notices that there is a problem...


28 posted on 10/12/2016 7:52:59 AM PDT by Pelham (DLM. Deplorable Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; Kaslin
I don’t know about “fair and square,” but he did indeed win the nomination.

What does that mean? What's your point?

29 posted on 10/12/2016 8:01:00 AM PDT by gogeo (Black Lives Matter to Donald Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

True that.

If there was any hope in the RNC distancing themselves from the ‘rats, Ryan destroyed that hope in one short day.

Stayed tuned. There’s so much happening today [newswise], my head is spinning.


30 posted on 10/12/2016 8:01:51 AM PDT by Daffynition (*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Good article, and quite on point.

I do not believe that Trump is nearly as "conservative" as many Freepers seem to want to believe. I expect there is going to be quite a bit of buyers remorse on this site during his presidency if he's elected. I suspect he's not going to be nearly as hard-line on the Supreme Court and Second Amendment (to pick two issues out of my hat) as we'd like for him to be. However, in order to put it in perspective, you have to consider how huge a threat the alternative is on both of those issues. I'm not normally a pragmatic kind of guy, but in this particular case, we really, really do not have a choice at this point. Like the author, I preferred Cruz in the primary, though he's been a bit of a disappointment since the nomination. Despite that, I'm all in for Trump. There simply is no alternative to that. The fact that McCain can't hold his nose to pull for Trump strikes me as the hight of hypocrisy, given that he and his surrogates were demanding the same of is not all that terribly long ago.

31 posted on 10/12/2016 8:09:46 AM PDT by zeugma (Welcome to the "interesting times" you were warned about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Tough times does not create character, it reveals it.


32 posted on 10/12/2016 8:16:50 AM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A good self-examination piece. Thanks for posting it.


33 posted on 10/12/2016 8:42:43 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
[HAPPY COLUMBUS DAY!]

The subdivisions of conservatism contain many corridors for channeling a love of liberty, smaller government and rule of law...
That discussion is for another day. From right now until the polls close November 8, there are only two kinds of conservatives: those willing to join the fight to protect America from a Hillary Clinton presidency, and those who, for whatever tortured reason they have fashioned, are unwilling.

There is the essence of the thread, and it can't be repeated often enough.

34 posted on 10/12/2016 10:35:51 AM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911

Very well said and HAPPY COLUMBUS DAY! to you too.


35 posted on 10/12/2016 10:48:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

‘Tis called Irony, my dear RedNeck

LoL

It’s is very ironic.


36 posted on 10/12/2016 11:33:10 AM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom

History plays out a lot of ironic things all right.

Well, I will most gladly take the irony. What got going with George Washington and his friends had been planned by heaven long ago, and when it needs something, the Lord does not necessarily have to raise up a pure philosopher for its sake. Donald Trump has been blessed with a sense of what America needs, and this is overriding many of his preconceived ideas. Could we have hoped to have seen more achieved with a second coming of Ronald Reagan? Well, history is soon about to play out the answer.


37 posted on 10/12/2016 11:53:58 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson