Posted on 10/10/2016 2:31:34 AM PDT by Helicondelta
I just watched the debate on replay. Trump won bigly. This one wasn’t close. And keep in mind that I called Clinton the winner of the first debate, and I now endorse Gary Johnson, primarily to avoid being called an alleged enabler of alleged sex abusers and their alleged enablers. That basket of deplorables includes both Bill and Hillary Clinton (the alleged doer and the alleged cleaner-upper) plus Trump and his alleged misdeeds.
Some quick reactions…
1. When the Access Hollywood tape came up, Trump dismissed it as locker room banter that he regrets. You expected that part. The persuasion move was that he quickly contrasted that “small” issue with images of ISIS beheadings, and cage-drownings. It was a high ground maneuver, a powerful visual anchor (like the Rosie O’Donnell move from his first primary debate), and a contrast play. In this framing, Trump cares about saving your life while Clinton cares about your choice of words. I realize the issue is Trump’s alleged deeds, not his words. But in terms of debate persuasion, Trump nailed it hard.
2. Clinton’s body language was defensive. Trump is physically larger and prowled the stage. He won the optics. It only got worse when a fly landed on Clinton’s face
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.dilbert.com ...
Nature votes!
If you are voting 3rd Party you are putting Hillary in the WH!
Great! Thanks for posting.
“The surprising strategy behind hillarys designer (lol, really? Those ugly sofa covers??) wardrobe” June 2016
She dresses like the United Federation of Planets’ ambassador to Rigel 7.
“but it seemed to me about a third in the mods smelled the blood in the water and turned...”
Yes, saw the same thing. Just my imagination running away with me?
Trump won it all yet this morning CNN says the enabler won with 100%
Flies have a unique ability to find piles of ****.
CNN...100%. Duh!
I nearly gagged when I hit this insane declaration
**” Michelle Obama, who’s become known as a style icon”.**
Yah.
Right.
And I’ll be on the cover of Cosmo, next week.
She looks like a frump, regardless.
I will say, however, that she is packed into some serious ‘shapewear’.
If I had to guess, I’d bet on the Vedette super-firm control line.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAA!
“$150,000 Wardrobe for Palin May Alter Tailor-Made Image”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/23/us/politics/23palin.html?_r=0
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
A fly landed on Hillay’s face....
You are not allowed to question anyone’s judgment. Yes, early this morning DH watching tee vee in the other room said CNN poll showed her winning by 100%. Assumed it was seen on CNN. Can only assume the Grimms brothers had been writing their script. :-)
You refer to Martha Radatz as a “blonde hag”. She should be so lucky. She looks like somebody hit her in the face with a shovel. She has a radio face. NPR at best.
That was a huge move that he really didn't do in the first debate. He watched the time and when HIllarys time was up he let them know. And when they let her go over he forced them to admit it. Any impartial person tuning in would see that the moderators were NOT being neutral. So many good moments but he took the "moderators" out of the debate for the most part.
I saw that fly. I thought I heard a tiny “help meeeeeeee.”
In another thread, someone posted a picture of her from the debate, and someone else commented “David Lee Roth has aged really poorly.”
Doh!
In defense of who that person is, one has to admit that they have absolutely nothing to work with...........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.