Obama-UN Internet Takeover Is Just Hours Away

The New American ^ | 29 September 2016 | William F. Jasper

[Freedom56v2]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3474923/posts

State AGs sue to stop Obama’s internet transition

[cymbeline]

I imagine someone could lease pipes from the Internet Service Providers and start their own version of the internet. It would be a complete different world with its own assignments of internet addresses and domain names.

I’m not sure the internationalization of ICANN is anything to worry about.

[no-s]

since foreign entities will likely buy up tracts of American IP addresses to spam from the comfort of their own borders.

Well, that should hasten the rise of IPV6 if nothing else...What's probably a more concern here is the possibility of international taxation through this proxy. And we'll find out if we really need ICANN and the root name servers, heheh.

[Democrat_media]

Great Info. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet

freepers can meet up on the freenet

[Democrat_media]

Great Info. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet

freepers can meet up on the freenet

[Democrat_media]

That’s interesting

[RockyTx]

perhaps some kind soul could tell us
what is FR’s internet-number address.

it would be something like 123.123.123.123

thanks

[TangoLimaSierra]

FreeRepublic: 209.157.64.201
SHTF: 67.43.5.170
Drudge: 98.158.27.203
foxnews: 66.171.225.158
Reddit: 198.41.208.138

[Democrat_media]

Democrats and Obama passed Net Neutrality to pave the way for this UN takeover of the Internet. Obama is giving away internet control to the UN. It will mean censorship and taxing of U.S. internet customers by foreign countries :

http://www.dailywire.com/news/8483/obama-about-take-over-internet-heres-everything-aaron-bandler

I’m a Trump supporter
Great Info. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet
freepers can meet up on the freenet

[TangoLimaSierra]

freepers can meet up on the freenet

I'm looking into that now. Another thing to consider is Winlink using the HAM radio system. It is setup so that even if the internet goes down, email can be sent by radio only. Very slow but if you can reach family or friends in a grid down scenario it would be priceless.

[SaveFerris]

yep

[Crucial]

Giving away control of the Internet won’t just limit free speech, it will also result in a command and control economy. Corporations and small businesses alike will have to cowtow to whatever rule or pressure the globalist come up with because so much business is conducted on the Internet.

Giving away the Internet will make the globalists rich and powerful beyond their dreams.

[Crucial]

But if it’s so insignificant why, oh why is Obama and the Dim Congress hell bent on doing it despite the growing public outcry?

[HollyB]

Please read this. This is the means for the UN SDG 2030 ro gain information for further control. You have no idea the implications of this take over and these are just some reasons:

UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism

UN Seeks “Unprecedented” Amount of Data to Impose Agenda 2030
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/22898-un-seeks-unprecedented-amount-of-data-to-impose-agenda-2030

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3474935/posts?q=1&;page=21

2005 implementation with 10 year goal
http://www.ip-watch.org/2015/11/16/internet-governance-forum-ten-years-after/

2030 SDG goals
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs

[rarestia]

You are a fool. If you think it is that simple.

20+ years in IT and several industry certifications disagree with your assessment, but if you have something to rebut my claims, please feel free to opine.

[rarestia]

I’m not advocating for this in any way, shape, or form. I couldn’t agree more with everything everyone’s said about how this is a terrible idea.

As an engineer, however, I can tell you that this isn’t so much a big deal for those of us who understand the bigger picture. The networks that interconnect the world are so robust that I can guarantee that as soon as they try to shut down one avenue, another will be made available.

The analogy I’ve used is that this is like the government shutting down interstates and handing over their control to the UN. They can’t possibly control the side streets, easements, and surface streets. You can still get from point A to point B, it’s just a bit more roundabout.

This is, however, a big lurch forward into the pit of one-world totalitarian rule, which is why Obama and his ilk are so proud to support it.

[MarchonDC09122009]

Just another reason why it’s NOT a good idea to have authoritarian governments in charge of Internet domain control...

Indonesia’s Government Wants To Make Memes A Crime
The country’s citizens are opposed to the vague proposition which is meant to prevent cyberbullying -

http://www.vocativ.com/363615/indonesia-memes-crime/

[HollyB]

Just curious, concerning the Internet, what are the side streets, easements, and surface streets?

When you have an entire data base collecting information, it can then use algorithms to point in directions which are of concern.

[Lazamataz]

ICANN is the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. While I disagree with ceding control, it’s much ado about nothing. They literally manage the assignment of internet addresses and DNS. The worst that will happen with this is that it’s likely we’ll see a substantial uptick in spam since foreign entities will likely buy up tracts of American IP addresses to spam from the comfort of their own borders.

I don't like ceding ANYTHING related to the internet, but rarestia is right.

My credentials are 25 years in internet/web IT.

[CincyRichieRich]

Political ownership and control in hands of Chinese or any other UN dictators trumps any naked technical solutions. It is who owns the firewall or any security or filtering that matters...wouldn’t you agree?