I’m not advocating for this in any way, shape, or form. I couldn’t agree more with everything everyone’s said about how this is a terrible idea.
As an engineer, however, I can tell you that this isn’t so much a big deal for those of us who understand the bigger picture. The networks that interconnect the world are so robust that I can guarantee that as soon as they try to shut down one avenue, another will be made available.
The analogy I’ve used is that this is like the government shutting down interstates and handing over their control to the UN. They can’t possibly control the side streets, easements, and surface streets. You can still get from point A to point B, it’s just a bit more roundabout.
This is, however, a big lurch forward into the pit of one-world totalitarian rule, which is why Obama and his ilk are so proud to support it.
When you have an entire data base collecting information, it can then use algorithms to point in directions which are of concern.
I like your analogy. And there’s so much redundancy in the telecom network that any one bottleneck is solved by automatic routing of traffic around it.
And we’re not forced to go down low bandwidth “side streets”. Huge capacity is available for high speed communications under the sea, by satellite, and fiber.
The danger of relinquishing control of the Internet is that incrementalism you suggested. In fact, the globalists will probably try to bypass the U.S. as much as they can as punishment for being a sovereign nation, not part of the New World Order and Commission run by bureaucrats and supported by Soros, Buffet, and that ilk.