Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia

I like your analogy. And there’s so much redundancy in the telecom network that any one bottleneck is solved by automatic routing of traffic around it.

And we’re not forced to go down low bandwidth “side streets”. Huge capacity is available for high speed communications under the sea, by satellite, and fiber.

The danger of relinquishing control of the Internet is that incrementalism you suggested. In fact, the globalists will probably try to bypass the U.S. as much as they can as punishment for being a sovereign nation, not part of the New World Order and Commission run by bureaucrats and supported by Soros, Buffet, and that ilk.


44 posted on 09/29/2016 4:26:40 PM PDT by poconopundit (When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government. Franklin, Const. Conv.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: poconopundit
I like your analogy. And there’s so much redundancy in the telecom network that any one bottleneck is solved by automatic routing of traffic around it.

Route around it and go where exactly? The ip address determines where you can be found and we would no longer have control over those addresses.

This not about the physical web, it is all about the control over traffic to ip addresses, which you don't get to pick.

64 posted on 09/29/2016 5:59:50 PM PDT by itsahoot (GOP says, Vote Trump. But if your principles won't let you, Hillary is OK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson