Trouble only for trolls.
Just been a FREEPER Since Aug 3, 2016 huh?..............Interesting.
Already posted.
Your ‘concern’ is noted......
not trouble just a blip.
just you wait.
hil is going to be crushed, just crushed. I hope she cries her life away.
So, if Hillary is winning among women by 9 points, that’s a margin of about 54% to 45%?? This is a similar margin to what we’ve seen in the last few election cycles, in which women overall go for the Democrat.
And also in recent elections, and perhaps this one too, drilling deeper will show that single women are strongly for the Democrat, while married women prefer the Republican.
So in other words, the masses of women are not excited about Hillary as the first woman president.
I heard someone say, that the reason Hillary is not doing much better among women overall, is because women are perceptive about other women, and many women think Hillary is a (fill in the blank, don’t want to get banned).
Statistical dead heat
The DNC’s “national news media” propaganda will have her up by triple digits by Saturday. Don’t worry about it. Just liberals being liberals.
YouTube Hilda cheating during debates are mounting......
This looks good consider the media onslaught for the past few days.
National polls are a barometer. But state by state polls are better.
And, I imagine that Trump supporters are more inclined to vote. For Dems? I don’t think they are as jazzed.
UPI had Romney ahead by 3 on October 11, 2012; one can look that up. We have to keep on.
It’s not good in that Trump was up 44%-39% before the debate, so a 6 point swing to Clinton. Trump should never have agreed to debate. He should have announced back at the first of the year he wasn’t going to participate.
The moral of the story is. Does being perceived as "winning" a debate really matter? Maybe for a few days to a week after the debate it does. But 41 days from now, when people are headed to the polls, they are not going to be voting on who scored the most points in a debate that occurred six weeks prior.
Polls are tools for rigging the system by influencing people’s thinking processes. The more they get to stay home because some dippy poll said it would be a waste of time the better.
How do you know the poll numbers aren’t just phony-facts like Al Gores climate “data”? Because it says “Rasmussen”? Whose side is “Rasmussen” on? You do know Scott Rasmussen left in 2013, right? The majority shareholder is a NYC-based private equity company:
Which has investments in a bunch of small media outfits:
http://www.nosonlawen.com/portfolio.html
Wonder what their politics are?
Doesn’t state DNC vs. GOP in polling percentages. Very suspect.
Search is your friend. All ready posted.
No, it is not trouble.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/10/03/what-political-scientists-know-about-debates/
Do presidential debates usually matter? Political scientists say no.