Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First on CNN: ISIS suspected of mustard attack against US and Iraqi troops
CNN ^ | 9-21-2016 | Barbara Starr

Posted on 09/21/2016 5:25:33 PM PDT by tcrlaf

ISIS is suspected of firing a shell with mustard agent that landed at the Qayyara air base in Iraq Tuesday where US and Iraqi troops are operating, according to several US officials.

The shell was categorized by officials as either a rocket or artillery shell. After it landed on the base, just south of Mosul, US troops tested it and received an initial reading for a chemical agent they believe is mustard.

No US troops were hurt or have displayed symptoms of exposure to mustard agent.

One official said the agent had "low purity" and was "poorly weaponized." A second official called it "ineffective."

A US defense official said troops had gone out to look at the ordnance after it landed. Based on seeing what they thought was a suspect substance, two field tests were conducted.

The first test was positive and the second was negative, the official said. The substance is now being sent to a lab for further examination.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndoncnn; bho44; chemicalweapons; iraq; iraqitroops; isis; mosul; muslimworld; mustard; mustardgas; project922; troops; usmilitary; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: piasa

“On December 4, 2002 UNMOVIC inspectors found mustard-gas filled artillery rounds at Muthanna. Iraqi officials claimed these rounds were previously declared. “


41 posted on 09/21/2016 8:52:51 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Unlikely, Obama’s been living with his head under the sand since he started drawing red lines when he was a child with his first box of crayons. He’d like nothing more than to ignore the whole affair.


42 posted on 09/21/2016 8:55:00 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234
Islamic Salami Is Salty.
43 posted on 09/21/2016 9:01:25 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
Islam=It’s Satans Lying Army Moron

We are going for ISIS.

You might want to know that only 25% of all Muslims are Arabs. The largest concentration of Muslims is in INDONESIA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_by_country

So, you would have to save MOST of your anger for the Oriental ASIANS, since so many are Muslims. There are also a BUNCH in Africa. There are also a BUNCH of Muslims here in the USA, even some with Farrakhan. Remember that asshole jerk?

44 posted on 09/21/2016 9:14:28 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie

Now, your initial premise may be right, but it is just as likely that ISIS would try to hit a US base with a WMD, simply for the propaganda value (to them) and because they WANT Armegeddon / the US drawn in. If ISIS can go out in a blaze of glory, they believe that will ignite a greater Muslim war that will result in the Caliphate they so dream of...

As for an immediate counter-battery response, why would the base counter-fire? The reputed ISIS shell apparently missed badly, and the base only had “suspicion” about it, so they went out to investigate. By the time they had their rather shaky “confirmation”, whoever fired that shell was almost certainly long gone.

Conspiracy theories are fun, but the simplest explanation is usually the most likely: The US bombing of the Syrian Army was most likely a snafu. (Repeated strikes on a “friendly” target, even then the recipient is screaming “friendly!”, are not uncommon. Pat Tillman sadly comes to mind.) The embarrassment & negative repercussions from this incident are greater than any “message” sent to Assad: He knows the Russians would intercede if he was in real danger, and no one I know of thinks the US wants a direct conflict with Russia in Syria.


45 posted on 09/21/2016 11:47:49 PM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

Clarification: The shell landed within the base, but, that’s an area with a 20 km perimeter. Lots of open area. No one was hurt & nothing was damaged, from what I’ve read.


46 posted on 09/22/2016 12:04:58 AM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

I should also clarify that this is not a US base (poor wording by me), but it sounds like it almost might as well be one...


47 posted on 09/22/2016 12:09:01 AM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: piasa

But, there were no WMDs in Iraq.


48 posted on 09/22/2016 9:59:21 AM PDT by Garvin (Age does not guarantee wisdom, and a college degree does not guarantee intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

I could care less what race a Mozlem is. The religion is inherently evil. It was made by a slaving warlord pervert and deserves nothing but disrespect.


49 posted on 09/22/2016 10:48:10 AM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson