How long before biology texts like this one get banned/burned?
http://www.google.com/search?q=Sex+Evolution+and+Behavior+Daly+Wilson
Posted on 08/24/2016 6:49:34 AM PDT by detective
West Virginia University (WVU) has told its 29,000 students that they are breaking federal law if don’t agree to use the pronouns — including ‘he’ or ‘she,’ ‘zir’ or ‘hir’ etc. — preferred by each person who claims to be transgender.
That policy means if a biological man — for example, famous transgender athlete Bruce Jenner — says he “identifies” his gender as female, then all other students must refer to the man as a “she,” or else be treated as a law-breaker.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
And the most bizarre thing about it all is that the universicrats are proud of this miseducation.
The college’s action is illegal and unconstitutional. Any referral to the police is a violation of your civil rights, and is actionable in a court of law.
I am official trans-racial now. I encourage all white Americans to identify as African-American, Latino, Asian and Other on all applications. If anyone questions you, say it is against the law to ask such questions as you are trans-racial.
You did call yourself “I”.
What self-identifying pronoun can substitute for “I”, if “I” do not identify as myself???
... lots of /s ...
This pronoun scheme cannot work and get anything else done. I suspect it will be selectively used to purge ‘racist haters’, etc.. Then back to business, oops make that entertainment.
Keep in back pocket to pull out as needed.
And just exactly what federal criminal statute are they citing for this? Or is it just more ridiculous bluster?
Why did God disagree. He created male and female.
People need to learn to live with it.
If you outlaw pronouns, only outlaws will use pronouns.
If that's their preferred "pronoun", you will.
If someone has multiple personalities, will the law require the use of plural pronouns?
Survive by addressing everyone as Comrade. Finish the degree. Then when the alumni association calls, address them as “Marxist MF”.
SOME restaurant or school or shop would throw me out, right?
OR at least harass me!!!
KA Ching!!!
If someone has multiple personalities, will the law require the use of plural pronouns?
I said early on, half kidding, that there will come a day a gay person will sue a heterosexual for denying his sexual advances, but now i am not so sure it won’t actually happen.
Exactly. It’s insanity.
That's true, I just thinking of something I posted a long time ago. "Aleister Crowley used to be the most wicked man on earth, now he's just a standard gay democrat".
So we are supposed to know that the weird looking female over there thinks it is a man today
I believe “it” is politically correct.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Whenever patriots hear about some federal law being broken, Title IX in this example, the first thing that they need to do is the following.
From a related thread …
Simply put, patriots need to make sure that the states have delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to make the law in the first place. This means checking the law against Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, the personal rights amendments, and Supreme Court opinion clarification of these clauses.
And in the case of the vote winning, anti-discrimation aspects of Title IX, patriots will find that the only sex-related protection that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect is voting rights as evidenced by the 19th Amendment, that amendment giving Congress the power to strengthen sex-related issues in the context of voting rights.
But since 1st Amendment-protected use of gender-related pronouns is clearly out of the scope of voting rights, somebody at the referenced institution basically doesn’t know what they’re talking about concerning individual citizen violation of Title IX imo.
And hypothetically speaking, even if the states had amended the constitution to prohibit the use of traditional gender pronouns, the Supreme Court had clarified in United States v. Cruikshank that the states have constitutionally prohibited only themselves and the feds, not individual citizens, from official actions that violate constitutionally enumerated rights. So I suppose that it could be argued that only state and federal officials wouldn’t be able to use gender pronouns.
So whatever the institutions are indoctrinating students with concerning 1st Amendment-protected free speech for example, its' evidently not the limited powers of state and federal governments as constitutional lawmakers had intended for those powers to be understood.
Also, patriots need to be concerned about people who are in federal prison because they broke a federal law that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to make.
How long before biology texts like this one get banned/burned?
http://www.google.com/search?q=Sex+Evolution+and+Behavior+Daly+Wilson
The Transhumannist/Postgenderist Überwhatevers are very adept at manufacturing “perception” against anyone they “feel” is “offensive” to their cause.
Worship the Cult-ural Emperor’s Rainbow Underwear - OR ELSE!
2 Thess 2:8-12
9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with the work of Satan displayed in all kinds of counterfeit miracles, signs and wonders, 10 and in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.
NIV
======================================
2 Thessalonians 2:10
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
[And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness] There are two ideas here. The first is, that there would be deceit; and the other is, that it would be for the purpose of promoting unrighteousness or iniquity. The iniquitous system would be maintained by fraudulent methods. No one who has read Pascal's Provincial Letters can ever doubt that this description is applicable to the system of the Jesuits; and no one familiar with the acts of the papacy, as they have always been practiced, can doubt that the whole system is accurately described by this language. The plausible reasoning by which the advocates of that system have palliated and apologized for sins of various kinds, has been among its most remarkable features.
[In them that perish Among those who will perish; that is, among the abandoned and wicked. The reference is to men of corrupt minds and lives, over whom this system would have power; countenancing them in their depravity, and fitting them still farther for destruction. The idea is, that these acts would have special reference to men who would be lost at any rate, and who would be sustained in their wickedness by this false and delusive system.
[Because they received not the love of the truth] They prefer this system of error and delusion to the simple and pure gospel, by which they might have been saved.
(from Barnes' Notes, Electronic Database Copyright © 1997, 2003, 2005, 2006 by Biblesoft, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Coincidentally, that's my preferred pronoun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.