Posted on 08/24/2016 5:57:14 AM PDT by reaganaut1
The first sentence is a completely inaccurate straw man.
Homosexual men are not born. They are created.
As someone who holds a degree in English literature, it’s beyond my scope to read fake words like cis and trans. They have to use fake words for their fake science.
Even an effeminate Truman Capote was not always so effeminate. He actually had a typical environmental upbringing for producing a homosexual man. There was no strong father figure present for many of his developing years. He was molested by an older homosexual as a teen. He eventually gave up on dating women.
Hermaphrodites are the only real LGBT people:-)
I believe it’s both or either.
Even ‘gender’ is a real word that should only be used a a grammatical tool.
French is a hypocrite. He calls Trump names, but he’s talking about whether gays are born gay? He also said he was removing Drudge from his bookmarks, because of a recent headline.
“Born this way” as in being easy to control and manipulate after being indoctrinated by liberal parents so that you end up being psychotic. I have watched liberal nutcases who have actually raised their own children to behave the opposite of their own gender (giving dolls to boys to play with, putting makeup on them, showing effiminate behavior to they will mimic it, etc...) I keep asking myself why the hell would the do this but I can only come up with media and educational indoctrination and mental illness.
Why arent both of my childhood friends flaming fags then? One is just fabulous with full blown AIDS. The other despises him and has nothing to do with him. Up until his choice was made after he was over 25 years old no one had a clue. Identical twins, same environment during their youth.......(?)
You are either brainwashed / abused into it or you make the active choice to live that way.
Because children who have never seen an adult penis or vagina, have an inherent preference for something they have never seen (in a NORMAL household) and of which they have no knowledge.
How does that work? How can someone *want* something and they don't even know what it is?
I used to work with a woman who was a lesbian, her sister was a lesbian and her brother was a homosexual. For me, that proves it is a choice. In their case, one developed due to the lifestyle at home when they were children.
Every homosexual I know personally - every single one - has some very bad juju in their childhood.
I always wonder how this notion equates to bi-sexuals?
No one really believed the homosexual gene exists, but it kept people from questioning, while the activists were forcing their agenda into our laws. No one wants the label “homophobe” any more than they want “racist.” So they are silenced.
Now we have the shift to “the right to choose,” which made the case for murdering babies, applied to the sexual deviancies that are rapidly being forced into our anti-discrimination laws. Discrimination is a good thing when it keeps a culture grounded instead of descending into to destructive behavior, but the Left will never admit that.
It doesn’t matter anyway. Born that way or chose to be that way—both are sinful in the eyes of God.
Personal thoughts:
1. A compulsion to wear a dress is more male than female. Most women prefer male pant legs for comfort. The male compulsion does not lead to wearing a dress in the shower either. Therefore, how can it be genetic?
2. Sodomy was commonplace in British war ships and is in US prisons. Due to an artificial environment not due to genetics.
3. Time Magazine recently wrote about porn addiction. Men who are exposed to massive porn videos have trouble being intimate with real women once again? Artificial environment.
We all have animalistic compulsions. Some people want to commit violent acts. And YES — such a compulsion IS genetic. But society refuses to tolerate violence.
We all feel a compulsion to breathe. And yes, the compulsion is genetic. But we learn to hold our breath underwater.
Homosexuality is a behavior, period. The entire LGBT movement is a ruse to force society to endorse a behavior and to suspend the free exercise of assessing behaviors as to whether they are in the interest of society. That is, to suspend the Judeo-Christian moral system and common sense. Thus to acquiesce to the normalization of a dysfunctional and immoral behavior and to, thereby, relinquish the morays upon which society stands. . .is how one destroys a society. . .which is the true intent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.