[rktman]

Geez. He says that like it's a bad thing. Dumbass! I did get a response from dead eye hairy screed the other day. It stated that "they" had noted my objection to new "gun 'safety' legislation". In an indirect way I suppose I was being chastised because I want children to be killed by unsafe weapons(?). At least that's kinda how it read to me. Luckily hairy will be gone soon. Not soon enough though. He'll still rally the union thugs in vegas to make sure NV goes to hildabama.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Just one more reason why SWMNBP must never be President.

(She Who Must Never Be President)

[pb929]

Gun ‘reform’. Is that what we’re calling it now?

[proud American in Canada]

“A Hillary Clinton Loss Would Hobble Gun Reform”

___________________________________________________

What’s the problem with “hobbling” more restrictive laws?

And now they are calling restrictions “reforms”?

Well, why not? After all, who could possibly be against “reforms”? /s

[MileHi]

Cry me a river, Murphy, ya’ pussbag.

[SandRat]

So Happy a thought; A HILLERY LOSS!!!

[Iron Munro]

By Jove, I think he’s got it!

[Sgt_Schultze]

...fact that a presidential candidate who ran asking for a mandate on guns lost.”

Democrats intentionally permit gun crime to propagate, because it augments their case that gun crime is out of control. They appreciate the opportunity violent crime has to enhance their ulterior motive of banning guns. What are a few hundred deaths of impoverished minorities compared to the leverage those deaths are worth toward their end? His big worry here is that if a candidate loses that opportunity and a crackdown ensues, it will work - invalidating their argument among those who pay the dearest of costs.

[9YearLurker]

Ugh—someone take my senator — please.

(And the other one plus my guv too, while you’re at it...)

[GenXteacher]

To Communist Chris Murphy: the destruction of gun control is on of the reasons to defeat Crooked Hillary.

[Paladin2]

We need Common Sense ‘Rat Control.

[umgud]

A Hillary Clinton Loss Would Hobble Gun Reform infringements, Says Connecticut Senator

[FlingWingFlyer]

“Gun reform”? WTF is “gun reform?” Sorry folks, this is America. Americans have a Bill of Rights. A Second Amendment. “Gun reform” is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Those who are afraid of freedom and hate the Bill of Rights really need to move to Canada now. Don’t wait for Trump to be elected.

[Red in Blue PA]

If Clinton wins, no criminals will be denied guns. Zero. They get them off the black market after all.

Yet the same cannot be said for law abiding citizens

[Cobra64]

Gun control advocates should be forced to watch videos of beheadings, stabbings, suicide vest bombings, etc. for 8 hours.

[libstripper]

WONDER, JOY AND GLORY!!! Another GREAT REASON to vote for Trump.

[publius911]

A Hillary Clinton Loss Would Hobble Gun Reform, Says Connecticut Senator

This moron says this as if deleting one of the articles in the Bill of Rights is a "good thing."

I am curious to see the newest version of "...shall not be infringed..." and the constitutional authority to modify it; or the logic gymnastics the SC judges would employ to justify it.