Skip to comments.
A Hillary Clinton Loss Would Hobble Gun Reform, Says Connecticut Senator
time.com ^
| 8/18/2016
| Philip Elliott
Posted on 08/20/2016 8:08:01 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Geez. He says that like it's a bad thing. Dumbass! I did get a response from dead eye hairy screed the other day. It stated that "they" had noted my objection to new "gun 'safety' legislation". In an indirect way I suppose I was being chastised because I want children to be killed by unsafe weapons(?). At least that's kinda how it read to me. Luckily hairy will be gone soon. Not soon enough though. He'll still rally the union thugs in vegas to make sure NV goes to hildabama.
1
posted on
08/20/2016 8:08:01 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
Just one more reason why SWMNBP must never be President.
(She Who Must Never Be President)
2
posted on
08/20/2016 8:10:45 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
To: rktman
Gun ‘reform’. Is that what we’re calling it now?
3
posted on
08/20/2016 8:11:43 AM PDT
by
pb929
To: Lurkinanloomin
President Trump's victory will usher in a new and powerful wave of Americanism.
More powerful than a locomotive ... able to leap tall buildings in a single bound ....
WE .. the people .. will BE the government and I believe President Trump will have enough of a handle on "his people" that he will keep us from going off a deep end.
4
posted on
08/20/2016 8:14:32 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true ... and it pisses people off.)
The goal is to pass federal concealed carry and prohibit states from passing laws limiting magazine counts and types of semi-automatic long guns. Trump will get national laws to over-ride and “trump” state laws so kiss your CT unconstitutional gun laws goodbye nazi-boy.
To: rktman
“A Hillary Clinton Loss Would Hobble Gun Reform”
___________________________________________________
What’s the problem with “hobbling” more restrictive laws?
And now they are calling restrictions “reforms”?
Well, why not? After all, who could possibly be against “reforms”? /s
To: rktman
Cry me a river, Murphy, ya’ pussbag.
7
posted on
08/20/2016 8:17:52 AM PDT
by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: rktman
So Happy a thought; A HILLERY LOSS!!!
8
posted on
08/20/2016 8:21:31 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said? was let used as the NM reporter car)
To: proud American in Canada
My thoughts on where Murphy can go and how to get there can’t be posted due to the code of conduct.
9
posted on
08/20/2016 8:24:16 AM PDT
by
CMS
(I have not heard any politicians say how to take away guns from criminals, just law abiding citizens)
To: rktman
By Jove, I think he’s got it!
10
posted on
08/20/2016 8:25:20 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
To: pb929
“..Gun reform. Is that what were calling it now?..”
Every time you see the word REFORM, run like hell....
That is the government weasel work for REGISTRATION AND CONFISCATION from law abiding citizens.
11
posted on
08/20/2016 8:28:16 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: rktman
...fact that a presidential candidate who ran asking for a mandate on guns lost. Democrats intentionally permit gun crime to propagate, because it augments their case that gun crime is out of control. They appreciate the opportunity violent crime has to enhance their ulterior motive of banning guns. What are a few hundred deaths of impoverished minorities compared to the leverage those deaths are worth toward their end? His big worry here is that if a candidate loses that opportunity and a crackdown ensues, it will work - invalidating their argument among those who pay the dearest of costs.
12
posted on
08/20/2016 8:28:53 AM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: rktman
Ugh—someone take my senator — please.
(And the other one plus my guv too, while you’re at it...)
To: rktman
To Communist Chris Murphy: the destruction of gun control is on of the reasons to defeat Crooked Hillary.
14
posted on
08/20/2016 8:30:36 AM PDT
by
GenXteacher
(You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
To: pb929
Gun reform. Is that what were calling it now? Yes ... and when socialists in South America used to talk about "land reform" it meant theft.
15
posted on
08/20/2016 8:33:45 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
To: pb929
Gun reform. Is that what were calling it now?Gun reform, climate change, highway robbery... all the same thing.
16
posted on
08/20/2016 8:38:30 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: rktman
We need Common Sense ‘Rat Control.
17
posted on
08/20/2016 8:40:34 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: UCANSEE2
Someone should ask this putz what he plans to do when the Gov says to turn in your guns and no one will? Then what smart guy?
To: pb929
We need to close the Gun Burglary Loophole.
19
posted on
08/20/2016 8:42:02 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: rktman
A Hillary Clinton Loss Would Hobble Gun Reform infringements, Says Connecticut Senator
20
posted on
08/20/2016 8:45:40 AM PDT
by
umgud
(ban all infidelaphobics)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson