Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Her Majesty's Canadian Ship (HMCS) ATHABASKAN alongside Sydney, Nova Scotia.

Lieutenant (N) Jarrod David Franais

1 posted on 08/11/2016 11:39:00 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

“Canada’s last destroyer will be taken out of service in the spring”

Darn - thought this was talking about Trudeau. I must have been dreaming.


2 posted on 08/11/2016 11:41:16 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Now is our chance.

Canada stands defenseless!

INVADE AND CONQUER!!!!!


3 posted on 08/11/2016 11:41:50 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I think they also cancelled the building of their replacement supply ship so this means Canada’s navy is a just a dedicated coast guard.


4 posted on 08/11/2016 11:42:28 AM PDT by MeganC (JE SUIS CHARLES MARTEL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Do they need the money for more social services and refugee resettlement? Another Western country preparing itself for submission?


6 posted on 08/11/2016 11:45:05 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
" Canada’s last destroyer will be taken out of service in the spring, leaving the country’s navy reliant on allies for longer-range air defence for at least the next seven years."

Curious if they really want to be reliant on us if Hillary wins.

7 posted on 08/11/2016 11:45:26 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Canada’s warships still have the capability to protect themselves from direct, incoming air threats but will have to rely mainly on U.S. ships to deal with missiles and aircraft at longer ranges.”

Nice of US taxpayers to take care of this for them.


9 posted on 08/11/2016 11:49:34 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"Canada’s last destroyer will be taken out of service in the spring, leaving the country’s navy reliant on allies for longer-range air defence for at least the next seven years."

Americans: Doing the jobs Canadians won't do.

11 posted on 08/11/2016 11:53:35 AM PDT by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The spousal unit is Canadian. She daily gets a ration of $#@! from her Northern friends on Facebook or on the phone about what idiots Americans are for having a candidate like Trump.

I now know why there is such passion from them. They know he is a pay to play when it comes to out-sourcing the US military for other country’s defence.

By the way, I’d be going “short” on the weird navy ship green paint if I was in that market.


13 posted on 08/11/2016 11:59:15 AM PDT by llevrok (Lies are born the moment someone thinks the truth is dangerous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Freeloaders.


14 posted on 08/11/2016 12:00:09 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That rust bucket was launched in 1970. 46 years old. Recent history include equipment malfunctions, cracks in the hull, sailors being arrested for drug and gun offenses, sexual assaults, fuel spills in Halifax Harbor, “the flagship vessel in the navy’s East Coast fleet”, so says the RCN.

Canada is nothing but a target rich environment without Uncle Sam protecting their socialist asses.


16 posted on 08/11/2016 12:11:24 PM PDT by mkjessup (The 'RATS are the ENEMY!! From OBAMA-'RAT to HILLARY ROTTEN RAT! GET RID OF THE 'RATS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Incoming capability gap: Canada’s last destroyer leaves service in early 2017

I've caught some crap from canucks telling us how we should vote.

Now here's the second largest country in the world with untold natural resources and they depend on "allies" to protect them. If that's not a fourth or fifth rate country then what is? And they have the audacity to tell us what we should do!

If you up in the [not so great] White North get your wishes and Madam Benghazi takes over, you'd probably better start learning russian or chinese, because your calls for help will go to voicemail - ask Chris Stevens.

17 posted on 08/11/2016 12:12:43 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("We re going to raise taxes on the Middle Class!" - HRC Aug 3, 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why do they need a Navy when they can depend on the US to defend them 100%.


23 posted on 08/11/2016 12:23:42 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Canada’s once significant “Navy” now reduced to a coast guard.... just another example of why Trump is so right that most NATO members are not pulling their weight!!

The “2%” of GDP that NATO members are supposed to devote to defense spending (only 5 members, one of which is the USA, actually do so) would provide a fairly minimal NATO force, since the personnel “overhead” in NATO countries is so high.

All these 50 RINO so-called “national security experts” are so mad at Trump for challenging the current vitality and adequacy of NATO, but it is the disastrous course of the socialist libs that has brought NATO to this pass.

Trump is simply demanding that everyone recognize the reality, that NATO is on an unsustainable course and the USA has been bearing unreasonable burdens for far too long.

I remember when the bombing campaign in Libya started up, and it was revealed that other NATO members could not even operate in the campaign without US support and logistics. NATO is a dishonest shell game, and Trump is exposing its current status.


24 posted on 08/11/2016 12:24:39 PM PDT by Enchante (Hillary's new campaign slogan: "Guilty as hell, free as a bird!! Laws are for peasants!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“but will have to rely mainly on U.S. ships to deal with missiles and aircraft at longer ranges.”

Trump is right...make them pay if they want our protection....why should the American taxpayer foot the bill so that Canada can provide cradle to grave social services to their citizens, while our seniors struggle to pay for prescription drugs...it’s wrong and Trump needs to call them out.


26 posted on 08/11/2016 12:29:46 PM PDT by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Unfortunately, they probably won’t even think about building one as long as Baby Trudeau is Prime Minister.


28 posted on 08/11/2016 12:37:42 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Have they been listening to Trump about paying their own way?


32 posted on 08/11/2016 12:56:59 PM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Now that Pierre’s son is PM perhaps the New York Nation Guard should attack Ottawa and make Canada our 51st State. Surrender would be announced in about 24 hours.

We have to kick Obammy’s arse out of the White Hut first and make damned certain that the criminal Hillary hasn’t been elected by American idiot voters.


39 posted on 08/11/2016 1:30:23 PM PDT by HomerBohn (Liberals and Slinkys: Good for nothing but make you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson