Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TWA 800: Calling Agent Bongardt, Your Nation Needs You
American Thinker ^ | August 3, 2016 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 08/03/2016 9:49:25 AM PDT by Kaslin

It has been four weeks since my book, TWA 800: The Crash, The Cover-Up, The Conspiracy, debuted. Despite a two-week media hiatus due to the conventions, I continue to receive one or two new leads a day, many from inside the investigation.

I would encourage those with information to share to contact me in confidence through my website, Cashill.com. As one new source told me, he never knew before where to turn. Another, a retired international captain, said I was the first person in the media to listen to him after years of trying to break through.

As a quick reminder, TWA Flight 800 blew up off the coast of Long Island on July 17, 1996. A few weeks ago, I received an email from a fellow that, in a fairer world, would have been newsworthy in itself. Joe Johnson worked with the FBI missile team on the investigation as an industry partner. He concluded his initial email with the compelling line, “It would be better if we had a chat on the phone. I can prove that it was a missile.”

In the course of our subsequent conversations, Johnson laid out the evidence to support a missile strike: the motion correction for small guidance errors, the smooth turn toward the target at intercept, the resistance of Jet A fuel to a spark, and for Johnson, most significantly, the radar data that showed “debris exiting the aircraft at a supersonic velocity.” In the excellent 2103 documentary, TWA Flight 800, physicist Tom Stalcup considered that radar data “the smoking gun.”

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: cia; clinton; fbi; foilwatch; twa800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Tenacious 1

FIM-92 or Sa-14/16/18 Style manpads that the Taliban were known to have.
Recall the USS Cole bombing was terrorism.
Also the 1993 Trade Center bombing.
I wonder how many other terrorist attacks during the Clinton years went unacknowledged and unresponded to.

And recall that Clinton was once offered Osama Bin Laden on a platter, and Clinton refused to nab him.
His excuse when asked about it later,”Hyuck hyuck, Osama hadn’t done anything to us yet. hyuck hyuck.”


21 posted on 08/03/2016 10:59:12 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

He didn’t estimate the “supersonic” speed.
Even if the next paint was six seconds later,
the speed of additional “targets” that suddenly appeared
could be estimated by how far they had separated from the main “target”


22 posted on 08/03/2016 11:58:37 AM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I have no idea what took it down but it was not the center fuel tank


23 posted on 08/03/2016 12:17:38 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

Jamie Gorelick, the Mistress of Disaster. Also involved in the wall of separation on intelligence sharing between CIA and FBI that allowed 9/11 to occur. Also involved with Fannie Mae for several years during the run up to the financial crash and all the mortgage backed securities.

If you see her involved in something, watch out!


24 posted on 08/03/2016 12:22:39 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

TWA Flight 800 blew up because of a stupid internet youtube video.


25 posted on 08/03/2016 12:35:16 PM PDT by infool7 (The ugly truth is just a big lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
I flew the B-747 and I can assure everybody that it does not “Zoom.” It is not a highly maneuverable airplane. If the theory of the “zoom climb” can be true, it must assume that the plane is capable of a rapid change of attitude and altitude that is clearly visible to both witnesses, radar return and the flight data recorder. Why did they lie?
Could it be pre election timing? In that case, remember who was running for his second term at the time and who is his wife?
26 posted on 08/03/2016 12:41:54 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

That Jamie has been involved in some scary shi+.


27 posted on 08/03/2016 12:47:51 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Sadly there are always the post accident articles written with good intentions but just plain wrong.
An example is the one written by a coroner that stated that “no one survived the explosion long enough to fall into the water alive.” Comforting to loved ones but hogwash. He also stated “when the aircraft broke apart at 13,700’ the air pressure and the decompression would have killed most of the people who survived the shrapnel.” Again, hogwash. If the airplane was at 31,700’, yes that would have been a rapid depressurization but not at the relatively lower altitude. I do hope that those who can, continue and find the truth about this “accident!”


28 posted on 08/03/2016 1:00:50 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: infool7

Yeah, that must be it, because YouTube did not exist until 2005 and TWA800 was brought down in 1996 by a missile


29 posted on 08/03/2016 1:14:42 PM PDT by Kaslin (He neededAwesome the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

yes


30 posted on 08/03/2016 2:46:49 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Of course it was a cover up. The Clintons were in charge weren’t they?


31 posted on 08/03/2016 6:07:25 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

I miss Jack Cashill on KC talk radio.

Mark


32 posted on 08/03/2016 7:49:07 PM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson