Posted on 07/23/2016 2:46:53 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
For viewers, a whopping 57 percent said they had a “very positive” reaction to the speech, while only 24 percent said the speech had a “negative effect.”
Even more incredible for Trump was that 73 percent of viewers said the policies proposed in the speech would move the country in the “right direction,” with only 24 percent saying otherwise.
The speech left 56 percent of viewers saying they are “more likely” to vote for Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...
Amazing response. The Left is starting to panic.
True believers..............
Looks to me like only the hardline left, vote-for-a-Clinton-no-matter-whats make up that 24%, considering that only about that number statistically make up the left in electorate.
...and these results are from their carefully stacked deck.
CNN implodes.
I’m having trouble reconciling the 73% (policies proposed would move the country in the right direction) vs 57% (very positive reaction). Shouldn’t the fact that a policy would move us in the right direction automatically evoke a positive reaction? Either way, I’ll take it!
Bongs will fly in the CNN conference rooms!
Remember Journo-list? Bunch of well known liberal journalists collaborating with one another to develop anti-republican memes and hone “the message” they wanted to “teach” Americans? Well all those quotes from various liberal authors in your post focus (collude?)on the word “dark” in a way that confirms my assumption that “Journo-list” never dissolved - it reconstituted under another name.
Probably a five point scale, very negative, negative, neutral, positive, and very positive. The 73% figure includes people in addition to the "very positive" group.
This was my first thought. They really make it obvious, and they’re very lazy, by using “dark” or “darkness” repeatedly.
The 57% were responding to the speech itself. The 73% were responding to the policies proposed in the speech. So it’s conceivable that the 16% differential represents people who like what Trump is saying but didn’t necessarily think the speech itself (i.e. the style, the wording, etc.) articulated those policies as effectively as it could have.
If republicans used the word “dark” to imply “evil” the way these liberals have, they’d be called racists..........
Never heard of it before, looking up info on them right now. Thanks!
PS - I’ve been out of politics for quite some time. I was a member here back in 2000-2002, but I lost that login info
Before they took the poll and talked among themselves, and still, no one was for Trump, so they thought the poll was a safe bet. LOL
Wow the exact same source, just printed this story today - http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/07/23/news-media-kept-using-one-word-describe-trumps-rnc-speech-not-accident-368877
If Trumps speech was soooooooooooo dark, can you imagine what the response would be if it wasn’t as the media suggests. 57% is pretty damn good so I’d be looking for numbers in the high 80%’s
“I don’t know how Nixon won, I don’t know anybody who voted for him”. :-/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.