Posted on 07/23/2016 11:52:02 AM PDT by Kaslin
The other day in Wurzburg, Germany a 17-year-old Afghan refugee boarded a train carrying a knife and ax. Then he went to work. Four passengers -- Chinese tourists -- are in serious condition. Others were less seriously injured. Many aboard the train were treated for shock. The kid’s Lizzie Borden routine was accompanied by his shouts of “Allahu Akbar.” Beforehand, in a video, he had declared himself a soldier of the caliphate. Among his possessions was a homemade flag that resembled an Islamic State banner. German police gunned him down as he attacked security while attempting to flee.
The attack, reports Reuters, is “raising more questions about Chancellor Angela Merkel's open-door refugee policy.”
In fact, reports Reuters:
A leader of the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) said Merkel and her supporters were to blame for the dangerous security situation because their "welcoming policies had brought too many young, uneducated and radical Muslim men to Germany".
Welcoming policies, indeed. The problem of jihad in Western Europe and the U.S. is, in part, among Muslims permitted to enter. But it’s also among Muslims already here in the U.S. and throughout Western Europe. It’s about more than the perpetrators; it’s about their sympathizers and supporters, and about Muslim communities that remain silent about the killers among them, whether from fear, sympathy, or religious loyalty.
Last week, in the wake of the Nice truck attack that killed 84 innocents and injured scores of others, former U.S. House speaker Newt Gingrich called for testing Muslims for Sharia-compliance. Those who are compliant should be deported, stated Gingrich.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Get em outta here!
Start with EVERY mosque in the country.
As far as I am concerned the Muslims should have never been allowed to immigrate.
It’s a Muslim thing.
As far as I am concerned the Muslims should have never been allowed to procreate.
It’s also about muzzies that live in “no go” zones in Europw as well as the U.S.
We also have “no go” zones among black people in the U.S,. I don’t know about Europe. We will never be a “free country” as long as “No go” zones exist.
“We also have “no go” zones among black people in the U.S,.”
I remember the shock some people had about Jeremiah Wright’s hatred and agitation. It goes on ALL THE TIME and in many, probably most, black churches.
Exactly. The camel’s nose is under the tent and well we know the rest of the fable. And given lying to infidels to promote their religion is perfectly acceptable to them, do we really expect them to tell the truth about anything related to their cult? Really? Mass collection and deportation, devil be damned. It’s been done through history, in this case, it would probably be the most humane, assuming they cooperate. Don’t count on it.
The standard should be renouncing Islam.
There is nothing moderate about Islam.
Islam requires others to die.
The test should be simple: “Will you denounce Mohammad and reject his creed?”
If the answer is no, they get an all-expenses paid one-way vacation to the Islamic nation of their own choice.
Islam and America are simply not compatible, they are two competing political systems that could not be more diametrically opposed to each other.
We need to stabilize our own moral infrastructure, because you just know that any exceptions made to official religious deference, for troublesome faiths like Islam, will be turned on Christians (and having things like Gay Marriage in law will be a fulcrum for this too).
Muslim attackers are generally spiritual cowards. Increasing the gospel quotient in America (and encouraging it to increase, that sounds like something Trump is copacetic with) will cause Muslims to grumble and eventually look for sandier fields eisewhere.
Sometimes they get in Christian faces, like the huge mosque they built in the Nashville area. When will Christians get in their face?
WHAM!!!
The fireworks just went off in my head!
Who SHOULD President Trump name as Homeland Security chief? This is actually a very important question!
I've seen all kind of names thrown around for SecDef, SecState, Labor, Energy, Education, HHS, EPA, et al, but who would be right for Homeland? These are the folks who would run the FEMA camps, kiddies. First they need to scrub that cluster(bleep) called TSA, of course, but then what?
We need a patriot in this position, someone we could trust when the chips are down. I propose Lt. Col. Allen West.
WHAM!!!
The fireworks just went off in my head!
Who SHOULD President Trump name as Homeland Security chief? This is actually a very important question!
I've seen all kind of names thrown around for SecDef, SecState, Labor, Energy, Education, HHS, EPA, et al, but who would be right for Homeland? These are the folks who would run the FEMA camps, kiddies. First they need to scrub that cluster(bleep) called TSA, of course, but then what?
We need a patriot in this position, someone we could trust when the chips are down. I propose Lt. Col. Allen West.
It is going to take more Christianity to drive rabid Islam out of the picture, and Islam may launch some attacks before it yields.
Unless, to mix narratives, we can behead the camel....
From http://www.usacarry.com/forums/off-topic/53275-islam-law-prohibited-us-immigration.html
“The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States.
That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today.
Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.
The laws prohibits entry of “Aliens who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe seek to enter the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in activities which would be prejudicial to the public interest, or endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States.” It also prohibits the entry of Aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the US or of all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.”
I’m not an attorney, so antics with semantics is not my strong suit...However, sure sounds like Islam and Muzzies would fall under the scope of this law, should anyone with the power and authority choose to enforce it...
I’d welcome such an action, Mr. Trump!
It’s spiritual “procreation” that is the worst problem. America should have been a place of gospel opportunity. Religiously radical Muslims would dread having families there because they might too easily be saved in Christ.
This “might” apply to Islam given its terrorism side.
If jihadistic Islam as we know it were content to operate by purely “religious” means, it might not be stoppable by a measure like this. But it is too wicked to stay its hand. It has to shake a fist like birds gotta fly and fish gotta swim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.