Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s Answer to Black-on-Cop Murder
American Thinker ^ | July 21, 2016 | Colin Flaherty

Posted on 07/21/2016 10:40:23 AM PDT by Kaslin

Wouldn’t it be pretty to think all we had to do to stop black people from killing cops was put a few leaders of Black Lives Matter in jail?

That is what Donald Trump recently told Bill O’Reilly: “Everybody is free to say what you want to say up to a point," Trump said. "But when you are calling death to police and to kill the police, essentially -- which is what they said -- that's a real problem, Bill. That's a real big problem.”

True enough. But Black Lives Matter is the tail, not the dog.

The dog is the towering level of black violence, hostility and criminality that is so wildly out of proportion. And puts cops in conflict with black people so often.

And how reporters and public officials ignore, deny, condone, excuse, encourage and even lie about it.

The talking heads just cannot talk plainly about it.

Instead we get gobbledygook about criminal justice reform and better police community relations. Next time you hear that, just remember what that really means: Black criminals do not like getting caught.

And neither do their enablers in newsrooms and city halls.

The angry young gay black women who started BLM became famous by hijacking a Bernie Sanders rally in Seattle, then booing Martin O’Malley off a stage and later making him cower in fear when they forced him to apologize for saying All Lives Matter.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/21/2016 10:40:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Colin nails it. Our entire society is pathologically anti-white, to the point where white nationalists have the moral high ground and most compelling, rational argument (the exact same argument/views on race as our founders, btw). The only remedy is real welfare reform and telling the truth about racial differences.


2 posted on 07/21/2016 10:55:38 AM PDT by IChing (Nuke Mecca already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Step 1 - Revoke the “racist” card.

As long as the left can shut down any opposition to their policies is by accusing a person of “racism” no progress will be made.

Until step 1 is done, there can not be any step 2


3 posted on 07/21/2016 10:55:50 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (The government is the problem, not the solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Around the rest of the country, a cop meeting a black person is much more likely to hear “F**k The Police” than “Hello Officer.””

Does Colin Flaherty have statistics to support that claim or is he just making it up?


4 posted on 07/21/2016 10:56:14 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IChing

Bkmk


5 posted on 07/21/2016 11:03:39 AM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Black psychopaths are just begging to be left alone. Leave them be. In 6 months there will be damn few left, I reckon.


6 posted on 07/21/2016 11:04:30 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

“Calling” someone an untrue name doesn’t stop the conversation... Unless the person being called racist allows it to.


7 posted on 07/21/2016 11:58:21 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot ( Total War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IChing

Welfare (or more broadly Entitlement) Reform, is indeed needed urgently. “Telling the truth about racial differences” (whatever those might be, and whether accurate or fanciful) will provide a stick for opponents to beat you with and derail your efforts.

IMO, a practical place to start is reining in the “ObamaPhone” program, an off-the-books welfare scheme that provides the communications infrastructure for a great deal of crime and agitation. ObamaPhones are the Community Organizers’ dream tool for spreading false narratives, building murderous angst, organizing protests and violence, and mobilizing their voters. Eliminating free communications would constrain a great deal of Leftist political activity (including organizing opposition to welfare reform), and general criminal activity. We are currently subsidizing all this, and need to stop.

I propose that the ObamaPhone program be restricted to the elderly poor and truly handicapped, with funding via tax credits administered by the IRS. The current program seems extremely vulnerable of constitutional grounds. It is a scam wherein Congress illegally delegates its powers to tax and spend to third parties who have a vested interest in expanding their taxing and spending on themselves infinitely, and without oversight. If this model were applied to other business niches (e.g., grocery stores could collect taxes from “the rich” and use the revenue to ay themselves for food doled out to “the poor”), there would be a hue and cry. We have a system of government, and this kind of thing has no place in it.

Of course the Democrats, RINO’s, Mexican billionaires, and phone companies that currently benefit would howl. Too bad.


8 posted on 07/21/2016 1:18:37 PM PDT by Chewbarkah (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

Technical points- It’s called ‘Safe Link’ wireless, it is only an hour a month, it actually was intended and works well for people looking for work, since one can’t find a job without a call back number, and it started in 2008 before Obama took office being an initiative of the Bush administration. It is funded by the phone companies.


9 posted on 07/21/2016 1:34:34 PM PDT by RedStateRocker (Better questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

Our forefathers told the truth about racial differences for hundreds of years. It wasn’t until several decades ago that whites became suicidally ethnomasochistic and pathologically altruistic, attacking any other whites who deviate from the egalitarian anti-white brainwashing.


10 posted on 07/21/2016 1:52:15 PM PDT by IChing (Nuke Mecca already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IChing
Our forefathers told the truth about racial differences for hundreds of years. It wasn’t until several decades ago that whites became suicidally ethnomasochistic and pathologically altruistic, attacking any other whites who deviate from the egalitarian anti-white brainwashing.

Since you seem to have all the answers, what, specifically, do you propose?

Jesus Christ: You can't impeach Him and He ain't gonna resign.



11 posted on 07/21/2016 2:26:49 PM PDT by rdb3 (You know, I've yet to see a hearse with a U-Hall trailer hitched to it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Whites better get their heads out of their rear ends.


12 posted on 07/21/2016 2:28:28 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot

Or that person gets fired from their job in a public way that blacklists them from all future employment. That threat will stop most people who value stability, family, work, and employment.


13 posted on 07/21/2016 6:54:12 PM PDT by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And in other news, my agency has received five separate and different intel bulletins in the last two days from federal, state, and local LE agencies warning that several different groups have promised to shoot and kill officers in the near future.

That’s just in St. Louis.


14 posted on 07/21/2016 7:04:30 PM PDT by Molon Labbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

See my previous comment.


15 posted on 07/21/2016 7:33:31 PM PDT by IChing (Nuke Mecca already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot

What if they are called that and it’s true? I happen to believe it’s true in all cases, btw - that everyone does and should have natural inclinations about race & that there’s nothing wrong with that at all. In fact, a person who is honest in that regard has the moral high ground over someone who perpetuates the lie that such biases can or should be realistically eliminated.

That is how we solve the issue. We drop the dishonest delusions and stop vilifying what is natural and right. Take the wind out of the sails of accusers by admitting to the charge as if it’s absurd the charge would even bother one.


16 posted on 07/21/2016 7:45:00 PM PDT by IChing (Nuke Mecca already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

And the only way to do that is to stop running away from it. See comment #16.


17 posted on 07/21/2016 7:48:00 PM PDT by IChing (Nuke Mecca already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IChing

You didn’t say anything.


18 posted on 07/22/2016 9:45:40 AM PDT by rdb3 (You know, I've yet to see a hearse with a U-Hall trailer hitched to it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Yes, I did. Read comment #2 again. I stated two specific things we must do. There are others, of course but those two are a start.


19 posted on 07/22/2016 12:42:47 PM PDT by IChing (Nuke Mecca already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson