Skip to comments.
Lynch says: Fed records laws not clear cut
Congressional Hearing
| 7/12/16
Posted on 07/12/2016 9:36:45 AM PDT by dontreadthis
Atty Genl Lynch testified today that it is NOT necessarily illegal to share classified material with an individual without security clearance
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: dontreadthis
At least they got that much out of her.
2
posted on
07/12/2016 9:37:45 AM PDT
by
aspasia
To: dontreadthis
Stooooopid woman does not even know the law.
You confirmed her, Republican Senate!!!
To: dontreadthis
4
posted on
07/12/2016 9:38:08 AM PDT
by
DarthVader
(Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
To: dontreadthis
I think they got a very different lecture on handling classified materials than I did.
5
posted on
07/12/2016 9:38:21 AM PDT
by
556x45
To: dontreadthis
It is if you’re in the MILITARY, you B***H
6
posted on
07/12/2016 9:39:01 AM PDT
by
zipper
(In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
To: dontreadthis
Really? So all the espionage laws are void. Imagine that.
To: dontreadthis
The Law now comes from the Mouth of The Lyncher.
8
posted on
07/12/2016 9:40:03 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: dontreadthis
She did not give the rest of the story. There are other procedures that require briefings and signings of affidavits such information will not be revealed upon listed penalties to include fines and imprisonment.
9
posted on
07/12/2016 9:40:06 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: dontreadthis
Defense attorneys are gobbling up this stuff, as they prepare for court appearances on behalf of their clients, whether or not they’re currently being tried, or have been convicted.
10
posted on
07/12/2016 9:40:25 AM PDT
by
Night Hides Not
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
To: dontreadthis
Making it up as she goes along, just like nobama.
11
posted on
07/12/2016 9:40:25 AM PDT
by
alpo
(Resist we much)
To: dontreadthis
between Obammy and Loretta LynchMob,, this nation has been taken over by idiots who could care less about the rule of law.
12
posted on
07/12/2016 9:41:01 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Mission:Semper Fi)
To: dontreadthis
A Democrat’s lips are moving....
13
posted on
07/12/2016 9:41:15 AM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: dontreadthis
The requirements have always been pretty clear cut for jobs I worked that had “sensitive” material available for those with a “need to know”. At least they were pretty clear cut from my viewpoint. From “classified” to “top secret”. I knew what my obligations and responsibilities were without question.
14
posted on
07/12/2016 9:41:50 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: dontreadthis
Sure. If a democrat does it it’s all right. If a normal person does it, they go to jail.
15
posted on
07/12/2016 9:42:31 AM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
To: dontreadthis
Water is not wet either in lawyer speak.
16
posted on
07/12/2016 9:42:55 AM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
To: dontreadthis
Technically, disseminating classified information to people without clearance is only a crime if it is done willfully or maliciously, or to foreign parties. It has to go beyond negligence to be a crime.
However, transmitting classified information over your private email system violates several federal laws, even if it was only negligent.
To: alpo
Arbitrary application of laws do not a sound republic make.
18
posted on
07/12/2016 9:43:43 AM PDT
by
fhayek
To: Boogieman
Why isn’t Hillary in trouble for doing government business on a private email server, whether anything classified was transmitted or not?
19
posted on
07/12/2016 9:44:49 AM PDT
by
Cecily
To: dontreadthis
Let her babble. Public opinion has already slammed the hildabeast over this issue. These idiots are trying to rationalize why some pigs are more equal than others.
The "little guys" are taking note.
20
posted on
07/12/2016 9:45:48 AM PDT
by
pfflier
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson