Posted on 07/07/2016 6:36:13 AM PDT by SE Mom
Hillary Clinton Email Investigation FBI Director James Comey testifies before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on the FBI’s investigation into Hillary…
(Excerpt) Read more at c-span.org ...
Hillary Clinton had no need for a secure smartphone.
She was not provided access at the level Obama has. In fact, I would guess that she was a shell SOS but running her own shadow government and pay to pay scheme under the Clinton Foundation.
How she got all the top secret and SAP access that was denied to her IS THE QUESTION!! HOW DID SHE GET IT? WHAT DID SHE SAY WHEN SHE WAS ASKED THAT QUESTION? WHY DID SHE HAVE IT? SHE WAS NOT AUTHORIZED FOR IT
Much as I dislike Cruz, could use him up there grilling Comey
As I reflected on Comey’s comments on Tuesday, it struck me that he may be more clever than we thought. His first 15+ minutes are loaded with sound bites Trump is already making into TV spots. Comey politely called her everything but a child of God and now it’s ALL OUT THERE from the top guy at the FBI!
Then by NOT referring it for prosecution, he has all but the most dedicated Clinton loyalists and brain-dead Democrats (but I again repeat myself) so FURIOUS at the failure to follow through that I believe the election may be an anticlimax — unless Trump steps on his ______________
(insert the name of your favorite body part here) or they STEAL another one.
So, if he DID get “The Word” from obozo to keep Clinton in the race (and my guess is that he did), his presentation was constructed to do as much damage to her while, at the same time, TECHNICALLY following obama’s order to NOT refer for prosecution, keeping himself out of the doghouse (best case) or from prematurely and suddenly dropping to room temperature . Perhaps some sort of spiteful, up yours obozo twofer? We may never know!
Bottom line: Comey may understand, as many of us do, that losing this election would be more devastating to Hillary Clinton than being indicted and the prospect of going to prison!
Discussion welcomed!
DeSantis.... trying to get Comey pinned down, Comey refusing to answer “hypothetical”
would FBI hire or retain person who was “extremely careless” in handling classified materials???
Comey won’t answer in general but ofc everyone knows the bleeping answer!!!!!!!!
Finally, DeSantis asks questions
Agree. They have to bring up Trump to deflect from the fact patterns set up by chaffitz. Jordan. Gwody.
As I reflected on Comey’s comments on Tuesday, it struck me that he may be more clever than we thought. His first 15+ minutes are loaded with sound bites Trump is already making into TV spots. Comey politely called her everything but a child of God and now it’s ALL OUT THERE from the top guy at the FBI!
Then by NOT referring it for prosecution, he has all but the most dedicated Clinton loyalists and brain-dead Democrats (but I again repeat myself) so FURIOUS at the failure to follow through that I believe the election may be an anticlimax — unless Trump steps on his ______________
(insert the name of your favorite body part here) or they STEAL another one.
So, if he DID get “The Word” from obozo to keep Clinton in the race (and my guess is that he did), his presentation was constructed to do as much damage to her while, at the same time, TECHNICALLY following obama’s order to NOT refer for prosecution, keeping himself out of the doghouse (best case) or from prematurely and suddenly dropping to room temperature . Perhaps some sort of spiteful, up yours obozo twofer? We may never know!
Bottom line: Comey may understand, as many of us do, that losing this election would be more devastating to Hillary Clinton than being indicted and the prospect of going to prison!
Discussion welcomed!
I believe they have to sign a document saying they acknowledge they have been trained in the handling of classified information. Where is her document, being the Head of the State Dept and all.........
Strange he said no.
In his initial statement covering for Clinton he stated several instances where she did.
His way of expressing she commited “gross negligence” proved they knew she actually did commit GN, which is prosecutable.
Comey has a long record of only prosecuting republicans and figures like Martha Stewart.
“I stepped back into the room to see that Eleanor Holmes Norton is once again demonstrating her ‘brilliant’ intellect.”
Yep, a box of rocks could speak more intelligently.
go deSaints!
Thoughtful scenario, argument.
Must think about it.
Norton is simply...pitiful. An embarrassment.
If Comey can adjudicate that “no reasonable prosecutor” would pursue this case, them can be opine or bring forth facts that answer one key question to “intent”..... FOR WHAT REASON DID SHE DO THE PEOPLE’S BUSINESS ON A PRIVATE SERVER?
When will he be asked about the letter of the law? that intent isn’t necessary?
That’s correct. For those who don’t have blinders on, there is no other conclusion.
The Clintons believe they are invincible.
As I reflected on Comey’s comments on Tuesday, it struck me that he may be more clever than we thought. His first 15+ minutes are loaded with sound bites Trump is already making into TV spots. Comey politely called her everything but a child of God and now it’s ALL OUT THERE from the top guy at the FBI!
Then by NOT referring it for prosecution, he has all but the most dedicated Clinton loyalists and brain-dead Democrats (but I again repeat myself) so FURIOUS at the failure to follow through that I believe the election may be an anticlimax — unless Trump steps on his ______________
(insert the name of your favorite body part here) or they STEAL another one.
So, if he DID get “The Word” from obozo to keep Clinton in the race (and my guess is that he did), his presentation was constructed to do as much damage to her while, at the same time, TECHNICALLY following obama’s order to NOT refer for prosecution, keeping himself out of the doghouse (best case) or from prematurely and suddenly dropping to room temperature . Perhaps some sort of spiteful, up yours obozo twofer? We may never know!
Bottom line: Comey may understand, as many of us do, that losing this election would be more devastating to Hillary Clinton than being indicted and the prospect of going to prison!
Discussion welcomed!
Ms Norton. Box of rocks
“good grief”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.