Posted on 07/05/2016 11:14:21 AM PDT by Mariner
A series of filing anomalies point to a Donald Trump camp that is either unaware of campaign finance law, or is actively funneling donors' cash to insiders, according to several experts interviewed by CNBC.
These "red flags," as one expert deemed them, include a total lack of disclosure on which vendors staffers for the presumptive Republican nominee are paying, an "unusual" six-figure payout to campaign staff for nontaxable expenses and what appeared to be double reimbursements for some employees' expenses.
When asked about the apparently unusual filing practices, Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks said in an email that "the report speaks for itself."
But experts said that message was not entirely clear, and at the very least broke with long-established protocols something that would be entirely keeping in character for one of the most surprising campaigns in the modern era.
"In my view, the situation is significant if (what) we are seeing is a pattern that reflects serious problems with the campaign," Larry Noble, general counsel of the Campaign Legal Center who also worked for 13 years as Federal Election Commission general counsel, told CNBC. "If the report is speaking for itself, it's not saying anything coherent."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
Screw ‘em.
HRC, certified not quite criminal enough to prosecute.
. . . and tax questions. they’ve already weaponized the irs. I’m sure they’ll be attacking any day now.
I’m sure they spent their entire weekend reading over the transcript of her interview, and correlating it with the evidence they had, and other people’s statements.
Or, the fix was in before the interview.
“But experts said that message was not entirely clear”
Who are these experts? Political hacks from the DNC?
No controlling legal authority.
While they tell us to "move on." We get "what difference does it make."
And there is this, “.....at the very least broke with long-established protocols....” will probably be the headlines on this evenings news on all the MSM carriers.
THERE WAS NO INTENT!
Can they prove “intent” by Trump? After all that is the new rule right? Or is that just for the Clintons?
Comey just diminished the FIB to something less than toll booth attendants. And no offense toward toll booth attendants.
Please don’t insult the lampreys.................
Yeah, lampreys don’t ingest Hillaryfeces...
From Wiki
The adult lamprey may be characterized by a toothed, funnel-like sucking mouth.
Perhaps I posted too soon..................
The FBI will get right on it.
hillary has raised more red flags than Trump, but the media is giving her a free pass.
It’s ok, there was no intent.
Let’s see...
Hillary commits TREASON...no big deal
Trump associate may have tweaked taxes....Leavenworth for sure
It worked for Hitlery.
I read Comey’s miserable excuse for letting the pig walk and as nears as I can tell, she got off because Comey thinks that she’s too stupid to indite
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.