Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squeako

When a law is passed that ignores the right of a man to protect himself from danger, let alone when it rejects our inalienable rights as acknowledged in our Constitution, that law and any others of its like are null and void on their face and the lawful man is well within his rights to refuse to obey them.

I will not obey, I will not comply. Any weapons that I had previously acquired will never be willingly surrendered. In fact, they were lost long ago in an unfortunate boating accident.

Molon Labe.


61 posted on 07/04/2016 11:33:31 AM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzrims trying to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Utilizer

Amen, brother!


67 posted on 07/04/2016 11:45:02 AM PDT by Squeako (None of them can be trusted. Be ready and act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Utilizer

What you said.

It is a fact that the Second Amendment is about the
people having the ability to defend themselves against
a tyrannical government (re: The Federalist #46 etal)
If ALL of the SCOTUS recognized that fact then Brown,
Newsom, and the rest of the “crimiticians” would never
get away with limiting firearm magazines and ammo
purchases.


78 posted on 07/04/2016 12:26:50 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson