Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN BREAKING NEWS: GOP-Led panel finds no wrongdoing by Clinton!!
June 28, 2018

Posted on 06/28/2016 8:22:56 AM PDT by NKP_Vet

This is what CNN is running on the bottom of the screen immediately after the Benghazi news conference was over. Talk about being in the tank for this witch. Once again proof positive that liberalism is a mental disorder.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: belongsinchat; benghazireport; learnhowtopost; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: NKP_Vet

They keep wondering why Americans do not trust them.

Do we really need a better example? Gutless Rinos playing word games to pretend a report on Benghazi is serious. Lying gutless elites playing CYA at the expense of American lives.

Guess in their minds we are all expendable. Remove them all for the good of America.


41 posted on 06/28/2016 9:34:42 AM PDT by JayAr36 (3never Trump = #4Hillary and that is a fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
The MSM and Hillary people have tried their darnedest to make Trump as crooked as Hillary AND IT IS BACKFIRING BIG TIME! Trump first of all is a private citizen....Hillary is government....Trump's unfavorabls are not like Hillarys....people TRUST Trump....95% of the people do not TRUST Hillary.....They can't compare jobs....they can only compare the TRUST FACTOR!....tell me that isn't a cooked batch of propaganda from the Socialist/Communist MSM and Hillary camp.
42 posted on 06/28/2016 9:35:57 AM PDT by yoe (Be very careful whom you vote for....you can't "love" away the enemy...they want to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

But no mention of the terrorist’s initial calls to “Stop shooting, we were sent by Morsi!” Is that in the report? I doubt it. So we knew in the 1st 24 hours that AA shoulder launched missiles were being smuggled through Turkey into Syria and the Turks knew and helped. We knew that Zero wanted to offload the blind sheik and help the Mooselimb Brotherhood with cred by doing so and we knew that the deal was to trade the sheik for the faux kidnap victim, the Ambassador. Is any of this in the report? This is worse than the Warren Commission, IMHO.


43 posted on 06/28/2016 9:35:59 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

bookmark


44 posted on 06/28/2016 9:39:23 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
But no mention of the terrorist’s initial calls to “Stop shooting, we were sent by Morsi!” Is that in the report? I doubt it.

I doubt it too. I followed this story very closely, have literally hundreds of bookmarks, and I've never seen even one sketchy report that that ever happened much less a credible source. The whole "kidnapping" scenario is nothing more than a conspiracy theory that holds less water than 9-11 conspiracy theories.

45 posted on 06/28/2016 9:45:25 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Wow! Serious case of ostrich syndrome here people. There’s a great deal of new information that is so very damning to Hillary and the administration.
Everything we thought here has been proven true but it’s even worse than we initially thought. The damning communications confirming that it was terrorists that coincide with the public message about the YouTube video are serious and inflammatory lies and deceptions.
If Trump does not seize this moment and spend some $$$$ to expose the lies discovered in this report then he is no better than Romney.

Politically co-opted MSNBC is covering Pat Summitt’s death while CNN is covering Brexit... this is BS and we HAVE TO overcome these lies foisted upon us.


46 posted on 06/28/2016 9:53:18 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (#NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

There was a whistleblower within 12 hours. Those of us paying attention remember well. I find it hard to believe a tinfoil hat type would have had enough inside info to have spun a whackjob tinfoil hat conspiracy in 12 hours. I also find it VERY hard to believe that a tinfoil hat nutjob would be taken seriously unless he was actually in a position to know.

Case in point. The Warren Commission. The tinfoil types did not appear until much later. I say the info that is credible in the first hours has a better chance of being the case. Certainly, it appears than the carefully crafted product we are treated to that, it seems, fails to deliver anything more than “system failure” and berates institutions while indemnifying actual people. Sorry, I ain’t buying. Not today. Maybe such a report from a gummint with a high level of known integrity. Not this one.


47 posted on 06/28/2016 9:55:00 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Show me the evidence.


48 posted on 06/28/2016 9:56:03 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

I posted the link to show how delusional Clinton surrogates are. Of course the report found fault with Clinton and Obama’s handling of Benghazi.....but that is not how CNN, MSNBC and 99% of the rest of the media will spin it.


49 posted on 06/28/2016 9:57:24 AM PDT by NKP_Vet (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock ~ T, Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: odawg
-- Did the committee draw that conclusion, or is the headline a misdirection by CNN? --

The headline is misdirection, and relies on a peculiar definition of "wrongdoing."

The report has a substantial amount of new material that speaks for itself. The administration made no effort to send help to Benghazi, and know from the start that the compound was under terrorist attack. The administration also deliberately misled the public. Heck, the administration continues in its pattern of deliberate deception, with the press doing all it can to help.

50 posted on 06/28/2016 10:01:57 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
There are two public relations problems:

1) Sean Hannity and Kevin McCarthy crippled this committee when they conducted an interview during which McCarthy made it appear that the purpose of the Benghazi investigation was to damage Clinton's polling numbers.

2) Gowdy is today stating that his committee's report is not about Clinton and that no one should come to any conclusions about Benghazi without first reading his 800 page report (which maybe two or three people are really going to do).

As a result, what are most voters likely to think?

51 posted on 06/28/2016 10:02:41 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg
-- Did the committee draw that conclusion, or is the headline a misdirection by CNN? --

More crap ... Benghazi panel caps 2-year probe: No bombshell, faults administration - CNN. (contains outright lies)

Additional Views by Rep. Jordan and Rep. Pompeo <- relatively short. Read this.

52 posted on 06/28/2016 10:05:26 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
CNN has only seen part of the report.

And folks here who haven't read a page of it are ragging on Gowdy.....unbelievable. I think Gowdy handled that press conference brilliantly and that comment by Mike Pompeo about Hillary Clinton was priceless and he wouldn't have said it if the report didn't support it........

53 posted on 06/28/2016 10:17:08 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Hillary and whoever = one big bowl of stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I have noticed, and posted recently, about a dichotomy of folks. Sort of, there is two kinds of people. As a physician for decades my understanding of science is that all theory is just that. I have to deal with a reality that is dynamic moment to moment and have become comfortable doing so.

I notice that the talking heads on TV are either lawyers or “journalists” that insist on every statement being litigated fact. They are frustrating for us to watch because we, in the real world, know that reality is buzzing along around us every moment and that failing to deal effectively with a non litigated reality, like a bus, can be fatal to those in the crosswalk. Not lawyers and such. They voluntarily put on blinders to all the reality that is spinning and buzzing all around them. Static reality.

As I posted before about this, this is why the Impeachment of BJ was such a big deal to the libtards. Prior to that event the fact that BJ was perhaps the biggest horn dog since Vencie was the capital of the world was just a rumor and could be summarily dismmissed.

As Rumsfeld said, things we know, etc. Well there is things we know, things that are real, things that can be demonstrated with statistics, and litigated fact.

If you are waiting to cross the street until the bus is litigated fact, you are going to be waiting a long time. Especially if Gowdy is driving...


54 posted on 06/28/2016 10:19:30 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

You’re babbling.


55 posted on 06/28/2016 10:24:33 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Also included is an appendix with the following questions every voter should read and ponder why no answers were ever given

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/06/28/house-committees-final-benghazi-report-includes-these-15-questions-for-obama/

We won’t see MSM citing these


56 posted on 06/28/2016 10:33:30 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride

https://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/316953595/9-App-C-Questions-to-POTUS?skip_app_promo=true

Link to questions.

# 14 deals with providing lethal assistance to Libyan rebels, others get at crux of how O and to me his administration never sent support in spite of the reports that O authorized it and Panneta. Was aware. Certainly raises doubt about how much Hilly knew/ was even concerned about saving anyone.

Also wonder if she was asked any of these during her testimony and if so what was her response


57 posted on 06/28/2016 10:41:44 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride
Appendix C: Questions for the President

  1. The White House issued a readout of your meeting with senior administration officials on September 10, 2012, indicating "specific measures" had been taken to "prevent 9/11 related attacks." What were these specific measures, and how did these specific measures differ from specific measures taken on prior anniversaries of September 11?
  2. When did you first learn a U.S. facility in Benghazi, Libya, had been attacked? What were you told, and by whom? Were you informed Sean Smith had been killed during the initial attack?
  3. What orders or direction, if any, did you give to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta upon learning of the initial attack? Did you or anyone at your direction ever modify, withdraw, alter, or amplify the initial orders or direction you gave to Secretary Panetta?
  4. What were you told about Department of Defense assets in the region that could respond specifically to Benghazi? Did you ask for or receive a list of military or paramilitary assets in the region that could respond to Benghazi during the pendency of the attacks?
  5. Were you subsequently kept informed about the initial attack, subsequent attacks, and/or efforts to either send military assistance or evacuate U.S. personnel? By whom?
  6. When did you learn Ambassador Christopher Stevens was missing, and who informed you? Were you kept informed on efforts to locate Ambassador Stevens, and if so, by whom? When did you learn Ambassador Stevens was dead, and who informed you?
  7. [Classified]
  8. Were you aware that prior to any military asset moving to respond to the attacks the State Department expressed concerns to the White House about the number of military assets going into Libya?
  9. When did you learn of a mortar attack that killed Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty? Who informed you?
  10. Were you aware of any efforts by White House and Department of Defense officials during the evening of September 11, 2012, and into the early morning hours of September 12, 2012, to reach out to YouTube and Terry Jones regarding an anti-Muslim video? What specifically connected the attacks in Benghazi to this anti-Muslim [sic] video, and why weren't these efforts made after the protests in Cairo, Egypt?
  11. When did you learn individuals associated with terrorist organizations participated in the attack on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya?
  12. Did you receive the President's Daily Brief (PDB) on September 12, 2012 and September 13, 2012? If so, who provided you with the PDB?
  13. Have you ever viewed surveillance footage from the cameras (or other sources) located at the U.S. facilities in Benghazi depicting the attacks? Will you declassify this footage so the American people can see for themselves what transpired?
  14. Did you authorize a covert action or covert operation to provide lethal assistance to Libyan rebels?
  15. [Classified]

58 posted on 06/28/2016 10:49:22 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks for you formatting viewing / responding off I Pad in flight so not the best for this type of detail

This should be the lead story re the fact we don’t have answers and are going to hear the committees

1. Found no wrong doing in spite of no answers

2. Partisan report disproved by Dems version


59 posted on 06/28/2016 10:55:38 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

More babble. My wife took a semester long 400 level course, “Causes of the Civil War”. Boy, have I heard about it in the decades since. Great tomes have been written on the Fall of Rome. The man on the street had a good understanding of these things as they were occurring, I bet. Much of what they “knew” was probably never litigated fact. Much truth is not litigated fact and a great deal of litigated fact ain’t true.


60 posted on 06/28/2016 10:56:22 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson