Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Obamacare Rule Prohibits ‘Sexual Stereotyping’
CNSnews.com ^ | June 23, 2016 | Penny Starr

Posted on 06/23/2016 1:36:37 PM PDT by Petrosius

People Can Be ‘Male, Female, Neither, or a Combination of Male and Female’

(CNSNews.com) – Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell cited a new rule added to the Obamacare law to prevent discrimination, including “sexual stereotyping,” as one of the Obama administration’s successes in advancing homosexual rights.

“We took a major step just last month in the final rule of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act,” Burwell said at an event on June 9 at the agency in Washington, D.C., to mark Gay Pride Month.

The new final rule – which goes into effect on July 18 and was issued by HHS’s Office of Civil Rights – addresses three types of discrimination – those based on disabilities, persons with limited English proficiency, and discrimination “based on sex.”

Patricia Dean, a partner in the Holland & Hart law firm in Washington, D.C., analyzed the portion of the 99-page regulation that is focused on sex discrimination, including gender identity and sexual stereotyping.

Dean explained the regulation as follows:

“The final rules define ‘gender identity’ as an individual's internal sense of gender, which may be male, female, neither, or a combination of male and female, and which may be different from an individual's sex assigned at birth,” Dean wrote in the analysis posted on the law firm’s website on June 8.

“A ‘transgender individual’ is an individual whose gender identity is different from the sex assigned to that person at birth,” Dean wrote. “In defining what includes ‘sex stereotyping,’ the new rules reflect the Supreme Court's holding in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 250-51 (1989) that stereotypical notions of appropriate behavior, appearance, or mannerisms for each gender constitutes sex discrimination.

“The new rules thus define ‘sex stereotypes’ as stereotypical notions of masculinity or femininity, including expectations of how individuals represent or communicate their gender to others, such as behavior, clothing, hairstyles, activities, voice, mannerisms, or body characteristics,” Dean wrote. “Stereotypes can include the expectation that individuals will consistently identify with only one gender and that they will act in conformity with the gender-related expressions stereotypically associated with the gender.”

Dean called the rule “the first federal civil rights law to prohibit discrimination ‘on the basis of sex,’” including gender identity and sex stereotyping in health care programs.

The rule stated: "Sex stereotypes can also include a belief that gender can only be binary and thus that individuals cannot have a gender identity other than male or female. OCR [Office of Civil Rights] recognizes that an individual's gender identity involves the interrelationship between an individual's biology, gender, internal sense of self and gender expression related to the perception; thus, the gender identity spectrum includes an array of possible gender identities beyond male and female."

In her analysis, Dean also cited examples of how enforcement of the rule would apply, including the case a transgender individual who “alleged that a Colorado wellness program denied coverage of her mammogram because she transitioned from male-to-female rather than female-to-male.

“The wellness program was funded primarily by the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, administered by the CDC. Under the program, CDC's position was to cover only individuals who were genetically female. After OCR's investigation, CDC issued guidance clarifying that recipients of CDC grants may cover mammogram services for transgender women who have taken or are taking hormones.”

Another investigation by the OCR occurred when a man complained that the transportation company that gave him a ride to his doctor’s appointment criticized him for his “feminine gender expression.” The company agreed to train its staff on “how to avoid sexual stereotyping and the usage of appropriate terminology.”

The rule also requires businesses with 15 or more employees that use Obamacare to have a designated individual with the responsibility to comply with anti-discrimination efforts and to have “grievance procedures” in place.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: deathofsociety; deathofthiscountry; gender; genderdysphoria; homosexualagenda; obama; rulesgender; sodomandgomorrah; stereotyping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Petrosius

OH MY GOSH, MY FEMALE CAT THINKS SHE’S A MALE DOG AND A MOMMA What am I going to do!!!!!!!!!!!!!


21 posted on 06/23/2016 2:03:05 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act !?!??

Do we still start things with Section #1?

22 posted on 06/23/2016 2:03:24 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

I’ll make a toast....

Here’s the them, may they never fail ya,
Your genitalia!


23 posted on 06/23/2016 2:17:37 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BatGuano

( Here’s TO them...)sorry


24 posted on 06/23/2016 2:19:01 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
So, basically, a Doctor can’t “stereotype” you based on your actual genitalia?

They CAN confuse the issue by doing an addadicktome or a chopitoffame!

25 posted on 06/23/2016 2:24:24 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

I wonder what Jesus will say about this when He returns?


26 posted on 06/23/2016 2:25:11 PM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

You know, if they don’t “sexually stereotype” a person when providing medical care, they could kill them. There is no “gender fluidity” when it comes to biology or medicine.


27 posted on 06/23/2016 2:30:42 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronius; All
"Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell cited a new rule added to the Obamacare law to prevent discrimination, including “sexual stereotyping,” as one of the Obama administration’s successes in advancing homosexual rights."

Patriots are reminded that the only sex-related issue that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect is voting rights evidenced by the 19th Amendment. But since the Obama Administration’s discrimination policy is clearly outside the scope of voting rights, the policy is unconstitutional imo.

Also note that the Founding States prohibited the feds from establishing privileged / protected classes as evidenced by the following constitutional clause.

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States [emphasis added]: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

The constitutionally indefensible discrimination policies of the Obama Administration are effectively violating the above clause by promoting politically correct LGBT “rights” imo.

Finally, even though Congress has the constitutional authority to stop the Obama administration from ignoring the Constitution, all that we’re hearing from Congress’s direction concerning these issues is crickets imo, corrections welcome.

Remember in November !

Patriots need to support Trump by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that is not only willing to work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trump’s vision for making America great again for everybody who is here legally, but will also stop lawless presidents from establishing unconstitutional policies.

Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.

28 posted on 06/23/2016 2:32:51 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BatGuano

So, they can be a dog, a cat or any other animal I suppose...


29 posted on 06/23/2016 2:34:42 PM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

In the parable He said, when He returns after having recieved the kingdom, to bring those who refuse to serve Him and slay them in His presence.


30 posted on 06/23/2016 2:35:25 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

There being no constitutional grant of power for anything in the statute though.


31 posted on 06/23/2016 2:36:35 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
Prostate exams for everyone!

-PJ

32 posted on 06/23/2016 2:38:40 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Another alphabet agency runs amok, thinks it is passing a law.
Hey, Congress. Heads up.


33 posted on 06/23/2016 2:39:03 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
"There being no constitutional grant of power for anything in the statute though."

You are so right. The fault lies with the failure of both parties in Congress to fulfil their constitutional duties.

34 posted on 06/23/2016 2:39:21 PM PDT by buckalfa (I am feeling much better now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

“the secretary shall determine”

That’s all we need to know about obamacare.


35 posted on 06/23/2016 2:43:25 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
I wonder what Jesus will say about this when He returns?

I think things are beyond "talking" at this point.

If we sense anything at all, it will be a blinding flash of light followed by the smell of ashes as we suddenly find ourselves floating in space without a planet.

36 posted on 06/23/2016 2:46:30 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Which in turn will lead to prohibiting species, etc. stereotyping. Today, I identify as a purple penguin. Tomorrow, a lily pad. I’m going all out for the weekend and identifying as pink granite.


37 posted on 06/23/2016 2:51:01 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

This whole genderism insanity reminds me of the one line from Ghostbusters where the Mayor asks if it was true and Venkman assures that “this man has no dick.”

We have a political class divided between the dickless and the making shit up as they go along pussies (who are somehow rather ballsy).


38 posted on 06/23/2016 2:55:31 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius
Wow, talk about moving backwards. Modern medicine has been extensively criticized for "one size fits all" medical care, for neglecting women who get certain diseases, or men who get certain other diseases. In the research world, often researchers choose to test only one gender of animal because of factors that have nothing to do with the effects of a disease on one gender or the other (for example, female hamsters have bad tempers so researchers would rather use male hamsters). In response to the criticisms of not doing research on both genders, researchers have expanded their research to include both genders. Indeed, it turns out that interventions that are effective in men do not work as well in women and vice versa.

Thus, this rule is putting the practice of medicine back by decades. And that isn't even addressing the issue of the inappropriateness of trying to schedule a man for a Pap, or a woman for a prostate exam.

Ludicrous.

39 posted on 06/23/2016 3:06:31 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Thankfully he will be gone soon and everything he touched will be erased


40 posted on 06/23/2016 6:01:33 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (without the 1st we have no second)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson